Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 330 results (0.135 seconds)
Oct 12 2004 (TRI)

Canara Bank Vs. Computer Data Application Pvt.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Oct-12-2004

Reported in: I(2005)BC139

..... defendant is the principal borrower who availed loan facilities from the applicant bank in the form of term loan of rs 4 lakhs ..... the suit be dismissed 5 the learned po after hearing the applicant bank and defendant no 3 and after going through the entire ..... material placed before him came to the conclusion that the applicant bank had successfully proved that the defendants were liable to pay .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2004 (TRI)

D.B.S. Industries and ors. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-02-2004

..... ratio of the decisions relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants is strictly applicable to the facts of the present cases in malwa cotton spg mills ltd case the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 2004 (TRI)

Taneja Aerospace and Aviation Vs. Commissioner of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Apr-05-2004

Reported in: (2004)(168)ELT286Tri(Bang.)

1 by this miscellaneous application the appellant is seeking retention of the file in this bench although the matter has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner Of Customs Vs. B. Arunkumar'S International

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-05-2004

Reported in: (2004)(177)ELT152Tri(Mum.)bai

..... we quote section 1 2 of the customs act defines extent in respect of the applicability of the customs act 1962 which mentions that it extends to the whole of india .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 2004 (TRI)

Gokak-vadodara Spinning Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-05-2004

Reported in: (2004)(174)ELT99Tri(Mum.)bai

..... a well reasoned order which follows the decisions of the apex court and is squarely applicable to the facts of the case following the said decision we are of the view .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 2004 (TRI)

Perfect Mechanical Industries Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-05-2004

..... to the excluded category mentioned in the explanation ibid vide the bracketed portion and therefore applicability of the notification would not render the goods exempt for the purpose of the proviso .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2004 (TRI)

Multi Flex Lami Print Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-02-2004

1 these five stay applications are disposed of by this common order since the issue involved is the same after .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2004 (TRI)

Multiflex Lami Prints Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-02-2004

..... that the appeals themselves could be decided at this stage of hearing the pre deposit application under section 35f of the central excise act 1944 therefore with the consent of both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2004 (TRI)

Comfort Coolers (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-01-2004

..... confirmed the order of the lower authority hence this appeal 2 after hearing the stay application in this appeal it transpires that the appeal itself could be disposed off and with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 2004 (TRI)

Kalyani Foods Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Apr-06-2004

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC356

..... rules however the commissioner has distinguished the judgment and held that the same is not applicable it is the grievance of the appellants that the judgment of the apex court is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //