Application - Judgment Search Results

Shriji Carding Centre Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1991)LC147Tri(Mum.)bai

..... prima facie grounds hence they were heard together it was pleaded on behalf of the applicants that they are only tailoring establishments receiving printed cotton fabrics cut into pieces of the ..... by the assistant collector resulting in confiscation of the goods and imposition of penalty the applicants are stated to have appealed against those orders which are pending before the special bench .....

Barnes Vs. E-systems, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... below will be reversed and a likelihood of irreparable harm assuming the correctness of the applicant s position if the judgment is not stayed times picayune publishing corp v schulingkamp 419 ..... chambers citations omitted the likelihood that denying the stay will permit irreparable harm to the applicant may not clearly exceed the likelihood that granting it will cause irreparable harm to others .....

Finley Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

finley v south carolina 498 u s 1063 1991 u s supreme court finley v south carolina 498 u s 1063 1991 498 u s 1063 112 l ed 2d 841 timothy e finley applicant v south carolina no a 506 supreme court of the united states january 22 1991 the application for stay addressed to justice marshall and referred to the court is denied

In Re Berger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... wise expenditure of the court s resources to deal with fee applications on an individual case by case basis such an inquiry ..... statutory language is this notwithstanding the rates and maximum limits generally applicable to criminal cases and any other provision of law to the ..... this court s limited time and resources to deal with fee applications such as those of petitioner on an individualized basis we .....

Gozlon-perez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... involving lesser amounts of narcotic and nonnarcotic substances remained subject to the penalties applicable to offenses committed before the 1984 amendments including special parole 21 u s ..... as its preferred means of post confinement monitoring congress nevertheless decided to defer its application to drug offenses although the sentencing reform act established conditions for supervised release .....

Lankford Vs. Idaho

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in gardner v florida 430 u s page 500 u s 125 349 1977 is applicable in that case relying partly on the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and ..... is imposed 430 u s at 430 u s 363 364 the same limitation is applicable to our decision today footnote 21 t he penalty of death is qualitatively different from .....

Firstier Mtg. Vs. Investors Mtg.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... district courts of the united states footnote 3 an exception to this general principle not applicable here is the collateral order doctrine which permits appeals under 1291 from a small class .....

Air Courier Conf.V. Postal Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... claimed had been misinterpreted by the comptroller was itself a limited exception to the otherwise applicable requirement of 12 u s c 81 limiting the places at which a national bank .....

Turner Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state court of first degree murder and sentenced to death on appeal he argued that application of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary because it was excessive when compared .....

Ford Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... announced we subsequently held in favor of the new standard s retroactive application to all cases pending on direct review or not yet final ..... never raised a batson type claim and with the court s application of a state procedural rule that had not been announced when ..... the pointless severity shown here the supreme court of georgia s application of its decision in sparks to the case before us does .....