Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 332 results (0.107 seconds)
Feb 16 2001 (HC)

Explosives Consultation and Application Pte. Ltd. Vs. Idl Industries L ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

Reported in: AIR2001AP256; 2001(2)ALT378

..... by the respondent herein disputes and differences having arisen between the parties the applicant made several requests for referring the disputes to an arbitrator making a claim ..... terms arbitration appointment of arbitrator section 11 6 of arbitration and conciliation act 1996 application seeking appointment of arbitrator through intervention of court respondent did not appoint arbitrator .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2001 (TRI)

Org Systems and Dde Org Systems Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-28-2001

1 these appeals are taken up for disposal after hearing the parties on stay application and after waiving deposit 2 in the common order impugned in these appeals the commissioner .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Ciens Laboratories Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-02-2001

..... jain for the revenue 3 the assessees manufacture medicaments they had declared the price as applicable to wholesale dealers which had been duly approved the assessees were also clearing physician samples .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Charak Pharmaceuticals Vs. Central Excise and Customs,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-01-2001

1 when the matter was called none appeared on behalf of the appellants however they have filed an application in which it was stated that they had already availed benefit under kar vivad samadhan scheme further it was requested to treat this appeal as withdrawn in view of this the appeal is dismissed as with drawn

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Vegetable VitamIn Foods Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (E.P.),

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-01-2001

1 on hearing shri a v naik advocate for the applicants and shri b k choubey for the revenue it appeared that the appeal itself could .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Goodwill Clothing Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-01-2001

1 on hearing shri j c patel advocate for the applicants and shri b k choubey for the revenue it appeared that for the reasons recorded .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2001 (TRI)

ideal Sheet Metal Stampings and Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-01-2001

Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC810

..... for the purposes of classification the view that we have taken with regard to the applicability of note 7 to chapter 39 has in fact been expressed earlier by a single .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2001 (TRI)

Aarti Drugs Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Exicse,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-01-2001

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC472

..... kg and is a marketable goods hence the provisions as stipulated under rule 57cc are applicable rule 57d is not relevant in this case as modvat credit of inputs is not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2001 (TRI)

Laljee Godhoo and Co. Vs. Vs. Laljee Godhoo and Co.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-28-2001

Reported in: (2001)(78)ECC211

..... appears to us to us that the ratio of that judgment would be more appropriately applicable to the facts before us 8 the ground in the department s appeal against the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2001 (TRI)

Kirloskar Brothers Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-02-2001

Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT595Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the notification he however remanded the matter to the assistant commissioner to re determine the applicability of the extended period and to determine the claim made by the manufacturer before him .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //