Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Jharkhand and ors Vs. Rakesh Kumar Goswami
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI C.M.P.No.335of2013 TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ..... Petitioners Versus RakeshKumarGoswami . Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioners :Mr.AshishKr.Shekhar,Advocate FortheRespondents :2. 30.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the applicationbeingC.M.P.No.335of2013. Thelearnedcounselfortherespondentsdoesnotoppose theapplication. Thisapplicationisallowed. Now,intheparagraphnos.5,7and17ofthejudgment renderedinW.P.(S)No.502of2013dated18.07.20013,the word'subsistenceallowance'isignoredanditwouldbereadas 'officiatingallowance'. (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) R.K....
Md KalimuddIn Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.247 of 2013 with I.A. No.6533 of 2013 Md. Kalimuddin .......... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ............ Opp. Parties .............. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI .............. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhanu Kumar, Advocate For the State : J.C. to Sr.S.C.I ............. 19/30.08.2013: In I.A. No. 6533 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of C.M.P. No.247 of 2013. Learned J.C. to Sr.S.C.I appearing on behalf of the opposite parties submitted that though he has no objection for fixing date of early hearing of the petition but the prayer being for restoration of writ petition dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order, it can be disposed of even at this stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner also agrees for the same. Heard the parties. In C.M.P. No. 247 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for restoration of W.P.(S) No. 4133 of 2012. It has been stated that t...
Manoj Kumar Bhagat Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.109 of 2013 Manoj Kumar BhagatPetitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I..Opposite Party CORAM:HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the C.B.I : Mr.M. Khan, Advocate 11/ 30.8.13. This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of R.C. No.08(A) of 2010 including the order dated 18.3.2010 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act has been taken against the petitioner. Mr. A.K.Kashyap, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a case was registered under Sections 120B, 420,467, 468,471 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act on the allegation that one Contractor, M/s.PKS & Company having c...
Smt.Swatantri Devi Vs. Kanti Devi and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.52 of 2007 Smt. Swatantri Devi .......... Petitioner Versus Kanti Devi & Ors. ............ Opp. Parties .............. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI .............. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Advocate ............. I.A. No.1332 o19. 30.08.2013: In this I.A., the applicant-petitioner has prayed for restoration of I.A. No.1800 of 2007 to its original stage. It has been submitted that the said I.A. was filed for condonation of delay in filing C.M.P. No.52/2007 which was listed under the heading 'For Orders' on 19.12.2012, but the same was rejected for non-prosecution. It has been submitted that the applicant's counsel was ready in the said application on 19.12.2012. He was waiting for his term in the Court. In the meanwhile, he was informed that a case in other Court was called out. He rushed to the other Court to attend that case. When he came back, he was in...
Kishorte Das Alias Kishore Kumar Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5101 of 2013 Kishore Das @ Kishore Kumar Das .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. R.S Majumdar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 29.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Sidhgora PS case No. 64 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 366A/376 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from FIR that daughter of the informant was having friendship with the petitioner who took her to his house and forcibly established sexual relation with her. He had promised to marry her, but later, he refused and hence this case. It is submitted that prior to the present case, the informant had lodged Sakchi PS case No. 104 of 2013 under section 354 IPC alleging therein that the petitioner had tried to take the victim with him on his motor cycle. In that very cas...
Krishna Nand Shukla Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2268 of 2012 Krishna Nand Shukla .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Respondents :05. 29.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to avail alternative remedy in forum of appeal before the appropriate Authority. In view of the submission made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No. 6010 of 2013 also stands disposed of. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
Md Sahid Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8037 of 2013 Md. Sahid Ansari @ Sahid Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/29.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 414 /34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.33 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.92 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioner was apprehended with a vehicle loaded with stolen coal. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Md. Sahid Ansari @ Sahid Ansari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistra...
Sandesh Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2435 of 2013 Sandesh Kumar Gupta .. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Rishi Pallava For the State: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, APP 4/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Prem Chandra Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1634 o1. Prem Chandra Kumar 2. Uttma Singh 3.Prem Pues Kumar 4. Prem Pratick Kumar.....................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .....Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.S.K.Pandey 3/ 29.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Amit Singh Alias Amit Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 685 of 2013 Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. S.S. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : - Mrs. Anita Sinha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2, Advocate. 07/29.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Singh, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1438 of 2010, pending in the court of J.M. (First Class), Ranchi, is moved by Sri S.S. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Smt. Anita Sinha, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar No. 2, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed an application vide Cr.M.P. No. 121 of 2013 for quashing of order taking cognizance. In the said application, a Bench of this Court has ordered that no coer...