Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
icici Lombard General Insuranc Vs. Smt.Juli Kumari and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI M.A.No.16of2011 ICICILombardGeneralInsuranceCompany,Ranchi Appellant Versus Smt.JuliKumari&Another Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant :Mr.AmitKumarDas,Advocate 05/29.08.2013 DefectNo.1isrequiredtobecorrectedbythecopyingdepartmentfrom wherethecertifiedcopyhasbeenissued. SendthecopyoftheordertotheDeputyLabourCommissionercum Commissioner (Workmen's Compensation), Ranchi for necessary correction withinoneweekfromtodayandthecorrectedorderisdirectedtobesentback tothisCourtwithinafortnightfromthedateofreceiptoftheimpugnedorder. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Sumita Tete Vs. Central Coalfields Limited and O
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4625 of 2011 Sumita Tete .... Petitioner Versus Central Coal Fields Limited & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Kaustav Panda I.A. No. 5385 o04. 29.08.2013 By way of instant I.A. petitioner has prayed for early hearing of the case. Petitioner has approached this court against the order of rejection of her prayer for compassionate appointment on the ground that she was underage on the date of making application for compassionate appointment on account of death of her father who died on 8.3.1999 while working as Upper Division Clerk. Earlier also petitioner 's application for compassionate appointment was rejected on the ground that her mother was under employment and she moved this Court in W.P.C. 6840 of 2007 which was disposed of by order dated 30.6.2008 directing the respondents to consider the points raised...
Ashok Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.698 of 2008 Ashok Kumar Gupta............................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand ................... ..........Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Prashant Pallav 4/ 29.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the FIR itself has been quashed by this Court, this application has become infructuous. In view of the submission, let this application be dismissed as infructuous. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Vijay Shankar and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1722 of 2011 with Cr.M.P.No.1740 of 2011 Shiv Dutt Sharma @ Shambhu Sharma..Petitioner(Cr.M.P.No.1722/11) Vijay Shankar and others....................... Petitioners(Cr.M.P.No.1740/11) VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I and another.............Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.Prashant Pallav For the C.B.I : Mr.M.Khan For the O.P.Nos.2 and 3:Mr.R.R.Nath 21/ 29.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the talk of compromise is still going on which may consume some time and therefore, at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw these applications giving liberty to the petitioners to move to this Court, if the compromise arrived at in between the petitioners and the Bank. However, Mr.Khan, learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I submits that it may be that the parties may settle their dispute but it is to be looked into as to whether on the ground of compromise i...
Sri Prem Srivastava Alias Anand Prakash Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 432 of 2013 Sri Prem Srivastava @ Anand Prakash.. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State: Mr. Awanikant Prasad, APP 7/29.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Sri Prem Srivastava @ Anand Prakash is moved by Sri P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate and opposed by Sri Awanikant Prasad, learned Additional P.P. This is a case under section 379,431, 432 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 97,98 of the Bihar Minor Engineering Act, 1977 and Minor Mineral Rule 4(1). From perusal of the counter affidavit filed on different dates, it is clear that the petitioner's company, namely, Orissa Manganese & Minerals Private Limited is doing mining work on the lease hold area. Under the said circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 09.09.2013 and in that event ...
Bokaro Industrial Area Development Authority Hereinafter Called Biada ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI L.P.A.No.204of2013 with I.A.No.4132of2013 BokaroIndustrialArea DevelopmentAuthority. Appellant. Versus RecoveryOfficer,DebtsRecovery Tribunal,Ranchi&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI HONBLEMR.JUSTICES.CHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant : Mr.KrishnaMurari,Advocate ForRespondentno.2 : Mr.RajeshKumar,Advocate 06/29.08.2013: Learnedcounselfortheappellantsubmittedthatthereis subsequentdevelopmentinthematterandassuchhedoesnot wanttopursuethisappealaswellasinterlocutoryapplication. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdrawthisappealaswellasinterlocutoryapplication. Permissionisaccorded. Accordingly,thisappealaswellasI.A.No.4132of2013are disposedofaswithdrawn. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) (S.Chandrashekhar,J.) Sanjay/...
Sidheshwar Kumhar Alias Sidheshwar Kumar and anr Vs. the State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3312 o1. Sidheshwar Kumhar @ Sidheshwar Kumar 2. Vishnu Kumhar @ Vishnu Kumar... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed For the State: Mrs. Laxmi Murmu, APP 2/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Tadasha Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1097 of 2009 Tadasha Mishra........................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand ..................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Ananda Sen For the State : Mr.D.K.Chakravorty, A.P.P 4.29.8.13. Mr.D.K.Chakravorty, learned A.P.P submits that it is quite likely that today itself he would be receiving statement of fact and therefore, the matter be placed for other day, so that in the meantime, counter affidavit be filed. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 5.9.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 11.7.2013 shall continue. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Swapan Dhara Alias Swapan Kumar Dhara Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8043 of 2013 Swapan Dhara @ Swapan Kumar Dhara @ Sapan Dhara ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. R. P. Mukherjee For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/29.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Shyamsundarpur (Chakulia) P.S. Case No.38 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.224 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that petitioner was apprehended with a stolen motorcycle. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Swapan Dhara @ Swapan Kumar Dhara @ Sapan Dhara is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional...
Shiv Narayan Mahra and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.986 o1. Shiv Narayan Mahra 2. Awdhesh Mahra 3.Devnarayan Mahra 4. Rameshwar Mahra 5. Sanjay Kumar Mishra.......................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another .....Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.Manoj Tandan For the State :A.P.P 7.29.8.13. The order dated 20.5.2011 passed in Madhupur P.S case no.65 of 2005 by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur under which cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioners is being sought to be quashed on the ground of mala fide as according to the petitioners the case has been lodged falsely for wreaking vengeance on account of the fact that the son of the informant was convicted in a case lodged by one of the petitioners. Mr.Tandan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that upon submission of the charge sheet on 22.10.2006, the court to...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »