Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amit Singh Alias Amit Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Amit Singh Alias Amit Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024971

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Singh Alias Amit Kumar Singh

Advocate Sri. S.S. Choudhary

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 685 of 2013 amit singh @ amit kumar singh petitioner -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand & another ... opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar. for the petitioner : - mr. s.s. choudhary, advocate for the state : - mrs. anita sinha, a.p.p. for the o.p. no. 2 : - mr. manoj kumar no. 2, advocate. 07/29.08.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by amit singh @ amit kumar singh, in connection with complaint case no. 1438 of 2010, pending in the court of j.m. (first class), ranchi, is moved by sri s.s. choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by smt. anita sinha, learned additional p.p. for the state and sri manoj kumar no. 2, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed an application vide cr.m.p. no. 121 of 2013 for quashing of order taking cognizance. in the said application, a bench of this court has ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner. thus, i find that at this stage, petitioner has no apprehension of arrest. accordingly, at this stage, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 685 of 2013 Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. S.S. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : - Mrs. Anita Sinha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2, Advocate. 07/29.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Singh, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1438 of 2010, pending in the court of J.M. (First Class), Ranchi, is moved by Sri S.S. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Smt. Anita Sinha, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar No. 2, learned counsel for the opposite party no.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed an application vide Cr.M.P. No. 121 of 2013 for quashing of order taking cognizance. In the said application, a Bench of this Court has ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner. Thus, I find that at this stage, petitioner has no apprehension of arrest. Accordingly, at this stage, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial