Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Panchanand Mahto Alias Panchanan Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7943 of 2013 Panchanand Mahto @ Panchanan Mahto ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Ajit Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kotwali (Daily Market) P.S. Case No. 954 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 5210 of 2011 for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to theft of a motorcycle. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Panchanand Mahto @ Panchanan Mahto on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in conne...
Ganesh Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6031 of 2013 Ganesh Mahto @ Ganesh Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy For the State : A. P.P. ----- 3/29.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/324/325/302/452/427 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Bagodar (Saria) P.S. Case No.111 of 2004, corresponding to G.R. No.873 of 2004 (S.T. No. 449 of 2005A.) From the FIR, it appears that three persons were murdered due to enmity and the FIR was lodged against 23 named accused persons, including the petitioner and 15 to 20 unknown persons. However, it is apparent from the FIR that out of those named persons, there is specific allegation against four persons, including the petitioner, to have entered into the house of the informant and committed the...
Daya Sunder Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.no.2434 o1. Daya Sunder Pasad Sinha @ Daya Sunder P. Sinha 2. Amita Kumari Sinha ..Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.Gautam Kumar For the O.P.No.2 :Mr. S. Thakur 9/ 29.8.13. This application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against that part of the order dated 5.9.2012 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in Deoghar P.S. case no.298 of 1998 (G.R.No.920 of 1998) whereby and whereunder learned Magistrate on a petition filed on behalf of the prosecution directed the petitioners to produce original agreement dated 17.9.1996 along with Sulahnama. Before adverting to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the case of the prosecution needs to be taken notice of. It is the case of the prosecution that the informant had constructed a kachha house consisting of two rooms over the land bearing plot no...
Br.Manager, Oriental Insurance Vs. Lily Hemrom and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI M.A.No.18of2011 BranchManager,OrientalInsuranceCo.Ltd.,LohardagaAppellant Versus LilyHembrom&Others Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant :Mr.AlokLal,Advocate I.A.No.306of2011 03/29.08.2013 I.A.No.306of2011hasbeenfiledu/s5oftheLimitationActtocondone the delay of 90 days in presenting the appeal against the judgment dated 30.07.2010,passedinM.A.C.T.CaseNo.19of2008. ItappearsthatthenoticeswerevalidlyservedagainstR1toR4but noneofthemhaveappeared. OnbeingsatisfiedwiththegroundtakenintheI.A.,thedelayof90days inpresentingtheappealiscondoned. Accordingly,I.A.No.306of2011standsallowed. Listthiscaseundertheheading'foradmission'. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Ranjeet Giri Alias Ranjeet Kumar Giri Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1711 of 2013 Ranjeet Giri @ Ranjeet Kumar Giri... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Prasad For the State: Mr. V.K. Tiwary, APP 5/29.08.2013: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infrucutous. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Shailesh Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2804 o1. shailesh Kumar @ Md. Shailesh Kumar 2. Umesh Kumar 3. Dilip Kumar ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Bibhash Sinha For the State: Mr. S. Mahto, APP 2/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Sunil Nayak Alias Kalia Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7971 of 2013 Sunil Nayak @ Kalia ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Pravin Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 59 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 401 of 2010, S.T No.229 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 25 (1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was apprehended on 18.7.2010 along-with a stolen motorcycle and from his possession, one loaded country made pistol was recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Sunil Nayak @ Kalia on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amo...
Tapas Sarkar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3380 of 2012 Tapas Sarkar ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mrs. Richa Sanchita, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Mahesh Tewari 18/29.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Tapas Sarkar in connection with Complaint Case No. 1921 of 2011 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur is moved by Sri and opposed by Sri, learned Additional P.P. Earlier the anticipatory bail application of petitioner rejected by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.5.2012 in ABA No. 3206 of 2011. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Satya Narayan Rao Alias Panna Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8044 of 2013 Satya Narayan Rao @ Panna ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. D.K. Dubey For the State: Mr. S.S. Choudhary, APP 2/29.08.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Satya Narayan Rao @ Panna is moved by Sri D.K. Dubey and opposed by Sri S.S. Choudhary, learned Additional P.P. This is a case of misuse of bail. It appears that in spite of direction of this Court that petitioner should appear in the court below on each and every date, he did not appear on 11.2.2013. However, it appears that petitioner appeared on 4.7.2013 and since then, he is in custody. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the court below to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principa...
Pradip Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 469 of 2013 Pradip Kumar Singh ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : - Mr. S.S. Choudhary, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Nishant Kr. Roy, Advocate. 05/29.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Pradip Kumar Singh, is moved by Sri Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri S.S. Choudhary, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Nishant Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. From perusal of statement of complainant on S.A., prima facie, I find that there is no allegation that petitioner put the informant and his driver under fear of injury and took away the truck in question. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on o...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »