Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramendra Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 146 of 2013 Ramendra Kumar Singh .... .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Tandan, Adv. For the State : A.A.G. - -- 2/30.08.2013 The petitioner, by way of filing the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has raised a grievance against the Officer Incharge, Doranda Police Station that they are not registering the first information report, though the allegation made in the complaint petition discloses cognizable offence punishable under Section 384 IPC. The learned counsel for the respondent- State prays for two weeks time to take instruction and file counter affidavit in this matter. Time, as prayed for, is granted. Put up this case on 13.9.2013. In the meantime, the Officer Incharge, Doranda Police Station shall examine as per law, as to whether any cognizable offence as alleged by the petitioner is dis...
Baliram Prasad Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1027 of 2013 Baliram Prasad Gupta ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Devesh Krishna For the State: Mrs. Lily Sahay , APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Prabir Chatterjee 3/30.08.2013: Put up this case after two weeks, as prayed by O.P. No. 2, for filing counter affidavit. In the meantime, interim order dated 18.04.2013 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Ravi Kumar Dangi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2912 of 2013 Ravi Kumar Dangi ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.S. Dayal For the State: Mr. Vikash Kishore, APP 2/30.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Vijay Ekka Alias Vijay Kumar Ekka Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1088 of 2013 Vijay Ekka @ Vijay Kumar Ekka... ....Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sheetal Purnima ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi For the State: Mr. H.K. Shikarwar , APP For the O.P. No. 2 Ms. Sunita Kumari 5/30.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Vijay Ekka @ Vijay Kumar Ekka is moved by Sri A.K. Chaturvedi and opposed by Sri H.K. Shikarwar, learned Additional P.P. and Ms. Sunita Kumari, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. At the out set, Sri A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to keep the complainant ( O.P. No.2) as his wife with all honour and dignity and for that purpose he is ready to give written undertaking in the court below. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 submits that the complainant is also ready to reside with the petitioner as his wife provided he give undertaking that he will...
Shadab Mallik Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1250 of 2013 Shadab Mallik ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : - None. For the Complainant : - Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate. 04/30.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Shadab Mallik, is moved by Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Kumar Nilesh, learned counsel for the complainant. This is a case under Sections 419, 420, 406, 417 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from the counter affidavit filed by the complainant that parties had compromised the case and filed compromise petition in this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 10.09.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge ...
Balram Kumar Singh and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1376 of 2013. ----- 1.Balram Kumar Singh 2.Shyam Sundar Singh 3.Soni Devi Petitioners. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Archana Devi Opposite Party. With A.B.A.No. 1384 of 2013 Mukesh Kumar Singh. . . . . . Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Archana Devi Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh For the State : M/s S.Prasad and Moti Gope For O.P.No.2 : Miss. Mahua Palit. ----- 02/30.08.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Balram Kumar Singh, Shyam Sundar Singh and Soni Devi vide A.B.A.No.1376/2013 and Mukesh Kumar Singh vide A.B.A.No.1384/2013 is moved by Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by M/s S.Prasad and Moti Gope , Addl.P.Ps. for the State and Miss. Mahua Palit learned counsel for O.P.No.2. At the outset, Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh., submits that petitioner Mukesh Kumar Singh in A.B.A.No.1384/2013 is rea...
Ganesh Kumar Agarwal Alias Ganesh Agarwal and anr Vs. the State of Jha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1029 o1. Ganesh Kumar Agarwal @ Ganesh Agarwal 2. Mukesh Kumar Agarwal .. ....Petitioners Vs The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mr. P.K. Appu , APP For the Informant: Mr. Kamdeo Pandey 6/30.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Ganesh Kumar Agarwal @ Ganesh Agarwal and Mukesh Kumar Agarwal is moved by Sri Indrajit Sinha and opposed by Sri P.K. Appu, learned Additional P.P. and Sri Kamdeo Pandey, learned counsel for the informant. There is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. No specific overt act alleged against these petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below by 10.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing ...
Ramchandra Mahto and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr.D.C.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 127 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 426 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 853 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 857 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 861 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 869 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 881 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 84 of 2008 with First Appeal No. 109 of 2008 In First Appeal No. 127 of 2006 Ramchandra Mahto & another ....Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Appellants : M/s Bhawesh Kumar, Ravi Kumar, Kumar Rahul Kamlesh, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. R. Mukhopadhaya, S.C.-II (in all appeals) (IA No. 6210 of 2013 in First Appeal No. 127 of 2006) /30.8.2013: Heard the learned counsel for the parties on IA No. 6210 of 2013. Perused the application. The present interlocutory application is filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for analogous hearing of First Appeal No. 127 of 2006 with First Appeal No. 128 o...
Abdullah Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1212 of 2013 Abdullah Ansari Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Syed Nausad Ahmed, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. 07/30.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Yadunandan Choudhary Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 2264 of 2013 Yadunandan Choudhary ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate ----- 3/30.08.2013 Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that in this case prayer has been made for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including the order taking cognizance but since the copy of the order taking cognizance was not annexed with the petition, objection was raised by the office. In order to meet the objection, an interlocutory application bearing I.A. No. 6238 of 2013 has been filed wherein the order taking cognizance has been annexed. Mr. Sahani further submits that simply on account of grant of license of the status of Class-A contractor in favour of the contractors, the petitioner, being Engineer-in-Chief, is being prosecuted crimina...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »