Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhandari Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6426 of 2013 Bhandari Mahto... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Atanu Banerjee For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha, APP 4/29.08.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Bhandari Mahtoin connection with Mahuwatand P.S. Case No. 40 of 2010 ( G.R. No. 1040 of 2010) pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-2nd, Bermo at Tenughat in S.T. No. 282 of 2012, is moved by Sri Atanu Banerjee and opposed by Sri Shekhar Sinha, learned Additional P.P. Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected after considering the merit of the case and criminal antecedent report of the petitioner. Thus, I find no ground to reconsider the same. Accordingly, this bail application rejected. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Anand Kishore Sanmani Alias Anand Baraik Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6113 of 2013 Anand Kishore Sanmani @ Anand Baraik ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/29.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/27/35 of Arms Act, under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, in connection with T. Tangar P.S. Case No.08 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.63 of 2013. Petitioner was apprehended on 10.2.2013 and from the possession of the petitioner, one loaded country made pistol and two cartridges were recovered. The apprehended co-accused persons, including the petitioner, also accepted to be involved in the extremists activities. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordin...
Abdul Manan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5724 of 2013 Abdul Manan ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ashok Kumar . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zafar Alam For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/29.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Complaint Case No.1917 of 2009. Complainant was noticed in this case but the notice was returned back with service report that the complainant had left the address. It appears that at the stage of anticipatory bail also, the complainant was noticed, but the notice was returned back with the same service report. The cover of the notice shows that the notice was issued on the complainant on the same address as is mentioned in the complainant petition. The case relates to agreement for sale of land between the parties and it a...
Amar Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5107 of 2013 Amar Yadav .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 29.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Sidgora PS case No. 191 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from FIR that father, mother and sister of the informant were found dead in their Quarters having sharp cut injuries on their persons. Pralay Das, husband of the informant, confessed that with the help of his friends, including present petitioner, he has committed the murder of the deceased. It is submitted that save and except confession made by co-accused Pralay Das, nothing incriminating has been recovered, nor the investigating officer has collected evidence to connect the petition...
State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of Inves Vs. Binod Kumar Sin ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Tr. Petition (Crl.) No. 02 of 2011 State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. ..... Petitioner(s) Versus Binod Kumar Sinha & Ors. . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s)-CBI : Md. M. Khan, ASGI For the Opp. Party(s) : M/s ----- 18 /29.08.2013. Mr. Khan learned counsel appearing for the CBI submits that notice has already been served upon the opposite party Nos.1 to 4. So far the opposite party No.4 is concerned, notice seems to have been served upon him through his care-taker and, therefore, notice be accepted to have been served upon the opposite party No.4. In view of the statement made herein-above, notice is accepted to have been validly served. Let this matter be listed on 03.09.2013 under the heading for Admission. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Kameshwar Biyar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4759 of 2013 Kameshwar Biyar .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. J.S. Singh For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 29.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Dandai PS case No. 69 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 147/148/149/323/341/353/504/379/386 of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of the CLA Act. It reveals from FIR that some of the miscreants disclosing their identity as members of TPC had been to the place of occurrence in order to demand rangdari. They had snatched mobile phone of the informant and had also given their mobile numbers to have talk with them. In course of conversation, the accused persons were addressing each other by name in which one of the accused was addressed as Kameshwar. It is submitted that without verifyi...
Shiromani Devi Vs. Road Construction
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4502 of 2012 Shiromani Devi .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar For the Respondents : Mr. Ratnakar Bhengra 03/29.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner is a widow of late Amresh Kumar Singh who is said to have died under work charged establishment in the office of Executive Engineer, National Highway Division No.2, Dhanbad on 28.10.1994. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that several prayers have been made in the writ application including the prayer to direct the respondents to take the services of the husband of the petitioner in regular establishment. However, the petitioner now seeks to confine her prayer for claim relating to death cum retiral dues, basing her submissions on the ratio laid down by a Full Bench of this Court in the judgment rendered in W.P.S. No. 6826 of 2002 an...
Mumtaz Alam Alias Mumtaj Alam Alias Mansi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6082 of 2013 Mumtaz Alam @ Mumtaj Alam @ Mansi ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Deo, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hanwara P.S. Case No. 41 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 594 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 366-A/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation against the petitioner to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant . The impugned order shows that the statement of the victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C, wherein, she has disclosed her age to be 19 years and 6 months, but her age has been assessed to be about 17 years by the Court, and she has stated that she had gone along-with the petitioner on her own swee...
Shiv Dutt Sharma ? Shambhu Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1722 of 2011 with Cr.M.P.No.1740 of 2011 Shiv Dutt Sharma @ Shambhu Sharma..Petitioner(Cr.M.P.No.1722/11) Vijay Shankar and others....................... Petitioners(Cr.M.P.No.1740/11) VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I and another.............Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.Prashant Pallav For the C.B.I : Mr.M.Khan For the O.P.Nos.2 and 3:Mr.R.R.Nath 21/ 29.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the talk of compromise is still going on which may consume some time and therefore, at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw these applications giving liberty to the petitioners to move to this Court, if the compromise arrived at in between the petitioners and the Bank. However, Mr.Khan, learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I submits that it may be that the parties may settle their dispute but it is to be looked into as to whether on the ground of compromise i...
Akram Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 687 of 2013 Akram Ansari ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Md. Zaid Ahmad, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Tapas Kabiraj, A.P.P. For the Complainant : - Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate. 09/29.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Akram Ansari, is moved by Md. Zaid Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Tapas Kabiraj, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant. Complaint petition as well as statement of complainant on S.A. reveal that the present case has been filed because petitioner, who is accountant of the School, has not furnished the papers demanded by the complainant. It further appears that complainant apprehend that petitioner misappropriated the fund of the School. Thus, it is clear that the present case filed merely on suspicion. Co...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »