Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rizwan Alias Sonu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4191 of 2013 Rizwan @ Sonu ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra For the State: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha , APP 5/30.08.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Rizwan @ Sonu is moved by Sri Awanish Ranjan Mishra and opposed by Sri Shree Prakash Jha, learned Additional P.P. Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected. However, it appears that petitioner is in custody from 01.04.2012 and up till now no witness turned up on behalf of prosecution, though warrant of arrest against them had already been issued. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the court below to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh in conn...
Salim Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1055 of 2013 Md. Salim Ansari @ MD. Salim Ansari... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Shobhakar Mishra For the State: Mr. Tapas Kabiraj , APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Shree Nivas Roy 6/30.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Md. Salim Ansari @ MD. Salim Ansari is moved by Sri Shobhakar Mishra and opposed by Sri Tapas Kabiraj , learned Additional P.P. and Sri Shree Nivas Roy, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. There is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. No specific overt act alleged against this petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 10.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Tho...
Mihir Prabal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4885 of 2011 Mihir Prabal .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo For the Respondents : Mr. Sudershan Shrivastava, J.C. to Sr. S.C. I & J.C. to G.A.(Bihar) 08/30.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Deputy Director, Directorate of Provident Fund, Ranchi Jharkhand as party respondent no. 20 for which necessary correction shall be carried out at the relevant place in red ink during the course of the day. Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner has moved this Court in the present writ application for payment of post retirement dues such as balance amount of Gratuity, amount of Group Insurance Scheme, General Provident Fund , for paying back the deducted amount of Rs. 5000 from gratuity as per memo dated 20.12.2010 issued by the Office of Accountant General, Ranchi, Jha...
Chotan Bhuian Alias Sanjeev Bhuian Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 306 of 2012 Chotan Bhuian @ Sanjeev Bhuian .... .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Devesh Krishna, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr.Rangan Mukhapadhyay, Adv. - -- 6/30.08.2013 The petitioner by way of present petition has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection Meral P.S. Case No.32 of 1998 corresponding to G.R. Case No.271 of 1998 registered under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 216, 124A of the I.P.C & Section 17 of the C.L.A Act and also prayed for quashing of the order dated 20.11.2006 whereby non-bailable warrant against absconding accused has been issued by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent-State. Perused the material placed on record. So far as first part of the prayer is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing ...
Sushil Kumar Alias Sushil Kumar Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8191 of 2013 Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Sao ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/30.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chandrapura P.S. Case No.42 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.491 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that petitioner was apprehended with stolen street vapour light, choke etc. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Sao is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magist...
Amna Khatoon Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2747of2013 AmnaKhatoon Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.ArunKr.Pandey,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 06/30.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithAdityapurP.S.CaseNo.177of 2012correspondingtoG.R.No.639of2012,pendingintheCourtoflearned ChiefJudicialMagistrate,Saraikela. Itappearsthatthepetitionerhasearlierfiledanapplicationforgrantof anticipatory bail vide A.B.A. No.589 of 2013 and it stood dismissed as withdrawnvideorderdated02.04.2013. Attherequestofpetitionershewas given liberty to appear before the Court below for seeking regular bail but insteadofappearingbeforetheCourtbelowanotherbailapplicationforgrant ofanticipatorybailhasbeenfiledbeforethisCourt. It appears that the petitioner has been evading her arrest before the Court below and therefore, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this ...
Lalmuni Prajapati Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.2185of2013 LalmuniPrajapati Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.JitendraS.Singh,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/30.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThereisallegationintheF.I.R.thatthepetitionerandhisassociates, whowereallegedlymembersofterroristsorganisationknownasM.C.C., hadsetthehouseofinformantonfire.Atthetimeofincidenttheywere armedwithrifleetc. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionerisinjailcustodysince08.03.2011 whereas other accused having more or less similar allegation has been grantedbailbythisCourtvideB.A.No.1265of2013.Itisfurtherpointed outthatevenafterthedirectiongivenbythisCourt,tilldatechargeshave notbeen framedagainst this petitioner thoughin another Sessions Trial No.268 of 2008, in which coaccused Ram Ekbal Paul, Seema Devi and Guddu Kahar are facing trial, evidence of seven witnesses have been recordedbythesameCourt. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopp...
Barun Tiwari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8197 of 2013 Barun Tiwari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/30.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chauparan P.S. Case No.105 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.1888 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that petitioner was apprehended while committing theft of a loaded truck. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Barun Tiwari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Md. Abdul Naseer, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh, or his su...
Jai Prakash Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2393 of 2013 Jai Prakash Prasad .. ....Petitioners Vs The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. P.C. Sinha For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha , APP 2/30.08.2013: This application has been filed for modification of order dated 06.12.2012 passed in ABA No. 3660 of 2012. By the said order, petitioner has been granted bail with stipulation that he must surrender in the court below by 15.12.2012. It appears that the petitioner could not surrender by the aforesaid time. Reasons for not surrendering within the time stipulated as mentioned in this application does not inspire confidence. However, since petitioner has been granted bail on merit, I allow this application and modify the order dated 06.12.2012 passed in ABA No. 3660 of 2012 by extending the date of surrender till 10.09.2013, subject to the condition that petitioner deposit Rs. 5000/- with the District Legal ...
Dahsrath Yadav and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1720 o1. Dashrath Yadav 2. Rajendra Yadav 3. Barhan Yadav @ Barhni Yadav @ Badru Yadav @ Kailash Yadav @ Bahan Yadav 4. Raju Yadav 5. Lakhan Yadav @ Ramlakhan Yadav 6. Pramod Yadav 7. Mahendra Yadav .. ....Petitioners Vs The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. P.C. Sinha For the State: Mr. Amitabh , APP 9/30.08.2013: This application has been filed for modification of order dated 23.01.2013 passed in ABA No. 4034 of 2012. By the said order, petitioners have been granted bail with stipulation that they must surrender in the court below by 02.02.2013. It appears that the petitioners could not surrender by the aforesaid time. Reasons for not surrendering within the time stipulated as mentioned in this application does not inspire confidence. However, since petitioners have been granted bail on merit, I allow this application and modify the order dated 23.01.2013 passed...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »