Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manboth Gope Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8194 of 2013 Manboth Gope ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/30.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Raj Nagar P.S. Case No.44 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.639 of 2013. From the FIR, it appears that the case relates to recovery of stolen diesel. Petitioner has not apprehended at the spot, rather he is named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Manboth Gope is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A. Kachhap,...
Niraj Kumar Agrawal Alias Niraj Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1285 o1. Niraj Kumar Agrawal @ Niraj Kumar 2. Arjun Prasad Agrawal 3. Asha Devi 4. Suraj Prasad Agrawal @ Suraj Kumar Agrawal Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Abhishek Kumar, A.P.P. 08/30.08.2013 Petitioners are directed to implead informant as opposite party no.2. Issue notice to opposite party no. 2, for which requisites etc., under registered cover with A/D as well as under ordinary process, must be filed within one week, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In the meantime, petitioners, above named, shall not be arrested in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 506 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 2263 of 2010, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Budhu Lohra and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1373 o1. Budhu Lohra 2. Raman Munda 3. Maharaj Munda 4. Sohan Singh Munda 5. Ranga Munda @ Ranga Oraon 6. Bijay Kumar Oraon 7. Bali Chand Oraon 8. Durga Charan Oraon 9. Gurwa Munda ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : - Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. 09/30.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Budhu Lohra, Raman Munda, Maharaj Munda, Sohan Singh Munda, Ranga Munda @ Ranga Oraon, Bijay Kumar Oraon, Bali Chand Oraon, Durga Charan Oraon and Gurwa Munda, is moved by Sri Binod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Smt. Niki Sinha, learned Additional P.P. for the State. This is a case under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. It is submitted that there is no notification under Section 30 of the Indian Forest Act with regard to the Forest situated at Village Ulidih, P.S....
Sunil Kumar Sah Alias Sittu Kumar Sahu Alias Sittu Kumar Sah Vs. State ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.534 of 2013 Sunil Kumar Sah @ Sittu Kumar Sahu @ Sittu Kumar Sah ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Parth S.A. Swaroop Pati For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/30.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the Judgment dated 29.5.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Seraikela-Kharsawan, in Cr. Appeal (Bail) No.134 of 2012, whereby the appeal filed against the order dated 17.10.2012, passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Seraikela, in G.R. No.138 of 2012(S) rejecting the bail application of the juvenile petitioner, has been dismissed by the Appellate Court below.3. The dead body of an unknown female was recovered and the case was instituted against unknown, as Gamharia P.S. Case No.13 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.138 of 2012, for the of...
Awadhesh Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 191 of 2006 Awadhesh Kumar Sinha ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : JC to GP-II /30.8.2013: It appears that vide order dated 26.7.2013, JC to GP-II was directed to seek instruction in the matter as to why Investigating Officer has not submitted charge-sheet and/or final report against the petitioner in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 654/ 2003 dated 19.12.2003. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State Government further requests for two weeks' time to seek instruction. Request is granted. Put up this case on 20th of September, 2013. Till next date of listing, interim order dated 12.03.2007 shall continue. . (P.P. Bhatt, J.) S.B....
Shiv Poddar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3328 of 2013 Shiv Poddar ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Nagmani Tiwari For the State: Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, APP 2/30.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Sanatan Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3565 of 2013 Sanatan Tudu ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Nagmani Tiwari For the State: Mr. H.P. Singh , APP 2/30.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Surjit Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1315 of 2013 Surjit Kumar ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Tapas Kabiraj, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate. 06/30.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Surjit Kumar, is moved by Sri Kalyan Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Tapas Kabiraj, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Sanjay Prasad, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. There is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. No specific overt act alleged against this petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 10.09.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to ...
Oriental Insurance Company Limited Represented Through Its Divisional ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI M.A.No.164of2013 OrientalInsuranceCompanyLtd. Appellant Versus NarpatiDevi&Others Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant :Mr.PratyushKumar,Advocate 02/30.08.2013 I.A.No.5053of2013hasbeenfiledtocondonethedelayoftwodaysin presenting this appeal, filed against the judgment dated 10th April, 2013 in M.V.A.C.T.CaseNo.122of2007. OnbeingsatisfiedwiththegroundtakenintheI.A.,delayoftwodaysin filingtheappealiscondoned. Accordingly,I.A.No.5053of2013standsallowed. Appellantisdirectedtotakestepsforserviceofnoticeunderordinary processforwhichrequisitesetc.mustbefiledwithin10days. Noticeismadereturnablewithinfourweeks. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Ravindra Sharma Alias Ravindra Kumar Sharma and ors Vs. State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1404 of 2013. ----- 1.Rabindra Sharma @ Ravindra Kumar Sharma 2.Manoj Sharma @ Manoj Kumar Sharma 3.Urmila Devi Petitioners. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Suman Sharma Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Rajesh Kumar For the State : Sri A.K.Pandey, A.P.P. For O.P.No.2 : Sri Ananda Sen. ----- 07/30.08.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Rabindra Sharma @ Ravindra Kumar Sharma,Manoj Sharma @ Manoj Kumar Sharma and Urmila Devi is moved by Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri A.K.Pandey, Addl.P.P. for the State and Sri Ananda Sen,learned counsel for O.P.No.2 So far petitioner nos.2 and 3 are concerned, there is no allegation against them in the complaint petition. So far petitioner no.1 is concerned, it is alleged that he along with four others assaulted informant and his sister on 29.05.2008. It appears that for aforesaid inci...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »