Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahboob Ansari Alias Mahboo Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3246 of 2013 Mahboob Ansari @ Mahboo Ansari... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Dilip Kumar Prasad For the State: Mr. P.K. Choudhary, APP 2/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Rehana Ahmad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 682 of 2013 Rehana Ahmad Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rajeev Kr. Tiwary, Advocate For the State : - Mrs. Rashmi Kumari, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate. 06/29.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Rehana Ahmad, in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 2540 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, is moved by Sri Rajeev Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Smt. Rashmi Kumari, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Birendra Burman, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed an application vide Cr.M.P. No. 781 of 2013 for quashing of order taking cognizance. In the said application, a Bench of this Court has order...
Basgit Singh Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6122 of 2012 Basgit Singh .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagannath Mahato For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. I.A. No. 6287 o07. 29.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits by referring to the statement made in the instant interlocutory application preferred for early hearing of the case that an amount of Rs. 69, 635/- has been withdrawn from the treasury for payment to the petitioner but the same has not yet been paid. Respondents on the other hand have contested the claim of the petitioner for payment of certain arrears of salary ranging from different period for the year 2001 and 2002 as also certain amount of Provident Fund claimed by the petitioner. In such circumstances, the matter being contested is required to be heard on merit. At this stage no grounds for early hearing of the case is made out...
Murari Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5474 of 2011 Murari Kumar Yadav .... Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Hardeo Prasad Singh For the Respondents : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, A.S.G.I. I.A. No. 6136 o04. 29.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application petitioner seeks to challenge the Appellate order passed on 7.4.2012 during the pendency of the instant writ application whereby the order of termination of service of the petitioner has been confirmed. Petitioner has approached this Court against the said order of termination dated 19.4.2011. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact that the Appellate order has been passed during the pendency of the writ application. In such circumstances, since the proposed amendments are connected to the main cause of action and as the aforesaid development took place during the pendency of the writ applica...
Rana Banerjee Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3203 of 2013 with I.A. No. 6316 of 2013 Rana Banerjee ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mr. Amresh Kumar, APP 2/29.08.2013: I.A. No. 6316 of 2013 has been filed for withdrawing this anticipatory bail application. In view of the averments made in the Interlocutory Application, this anticipatory bail application is permitted to be withdrawn. I.A. No. 6316 of 2013 stands disposed of. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Chandra Shekhar Kuila Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7982 of 2013 Chandra Shekhar Kuila ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Indrajit Sinha, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sidgora P.S. Case No. 172 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 3190 of 2012 for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to theft of a motorcycle. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Chandra Shekhar Kuila on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Singh, learned Civil Judge (Jr.) Division, Jamshedpur, or his successor, in co...
Manju Pathak and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.601 o1. Manju Pathak 2.Rakesh Pathak 3.Dr.Kamleshwar Prasad Shukla............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ......... ..........Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.A.K.Sahani 11/ 29.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the matter has been compromised, he may be permitted to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application be dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Durgesh Kumar Agarwal Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4159 of 2012 Durgesh Kumar Agarwal .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Kumar For the State: Ms. Anita Sinha 8/29.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Durgesh Kumar Agarwal in connection with G.O. Case No. 124 of 2011 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Seraikella is moved by Sri Amit Kumar and opposed by Ms. Anita Sinha, learned Additional P.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not able to give correct address of O.P. No.2. Under the said circumstance, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Mahendra Yadav and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6077 o1. Mahendra Yadav 2. Pradeep Yadav 3. Sandeep Yadav 4. Kapil Yadav ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.K.P.Deo, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 48 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 405 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 385, 504, 506, 307/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of S.C. & S.T (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. From the FIR, it appears that there is allegation against the petitioners and the other co-accused persons to have demanded Rs.2,000/- from the informant on the occasion of Holi and when the same was not paid, the informant and his family members were assaulted and injured and there is also a...
Neeraj Das Alias Sonu Das Alias Neeraj Kr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1243 of 2013 Neeraj Das @ Sonu Das @ Neeraj Kumar...Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand....................................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: None 4/ 29.8.13. A slip has been filed wherein it has been stated that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw this application as it has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, let this application be dismissed as infructuous. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »