Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Than Singh & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~18 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8806/2025 THAN SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Parmil Kumar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. R-2 in person. ASI Vikram Singh, PS: Karawal Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 05.05.20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 368/2019 dated 19.09.2019, registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, North East, under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as well as Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional PublicProsecutor, accepts notice on behal...
Cnh Industrial Capital I(Ndia) Pvt Ltd vs Sk Sanarul & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2050/2025 CNH INDUSTRIAL CAPITAL I(NDIA) PVT LTD.....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sen, Adv.versusSK SANARUL & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. By way of present petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 [in short, Act], the petitioner seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the Loan-cum-Hypothecation Agreement dated 31.07.2019 [hereinafter referred to as agreement].2. The agreement provides for resolution of disputes by arbitration. Clause 31 of the agreement contains the arbitration clause. The seat and venue of arbitration has been provided in the said arbitration clause as New Delhi.3. The disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invokedarbitration clause by a communication dated 09.07.2025, in response to which, the respondent appointed an arbitrator unil...
Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, Northern Railways, Moradabad, U.P. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2074/2025 SR. DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAYS, MORADABAD, U.P. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC with Mr. Vineet Negi, Mr. Vibhav V. Nath, Ms. Kavya Shukla, Advs.versusM/S RAJESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. Mr. Nishant Gautam, learned CGSC appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the remedy in accordance with law and to approach the appropriate forum.2. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MAY 5, 2026 ajThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:34:15...
M/S Stl Networks Limited vs Caspian India Engicon Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2083/2025 M/S STL NETWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mehak Kalra, Mr. Lalit Besoya & Ms. Bhuvi Khatri, Advs.versusCASPIAN INDIA ENGICON PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kumar Prateek, Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.05.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was the successful bidder in thetender for the Telangana Fibre Grid Project and on 10.08.2020, entered into a Trenching and Ducting Agreement with the respondent on a principal- to-principal basis. Disputes arose between the parties to the lis. The petitioner invoked arbitration by issuing a notice dated 10.10.2025 in terms of Clause 32 of the Agreement. On failure to do the needful, the present petition was filed.3. Learned counsel for the respondent on instru...
Devanshu Mishra vs University of Delhi Through Its Vice-Chancellor & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19066/2025&CM APPL. 79372/2025 DEVANSHU MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Ashu Bidhuri, Mr Swapnam Prakash Singh, Ms Shabana Hussain, Mr Paras Batra and Mr Hrishabh, Advs.versusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI THROUGH ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Adv Ankur Chhibber, Adv Anshuman Mehrotra, Adv Arjun Panwar, Adv Amrit Koul, Adv Muskaan Dutta, Adv Prahil Sharma and Adv Aditi Kapoor.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 05.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- a. Issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, thereby quashing the impugned memorandum dated 03.04.2025 issued by the Joint Registrar (Examinations), University of Delhi; b. Issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, thereby quashing memorandum dated 12.09.2025 issued by the Joint Registrar (Exam...
Nb Sub Naveen Kumar vs Union of India Through Secretary & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19410/2025 NB SUB NAVEEN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Kumar, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC and Mr. Adhiraj Singh, GP with Mr. Aryan Dhaka and Ms. Sunidhi Tyagi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.20261. The Petitioner has been granted the status of a battle casualty pursuant to the order dated 01.05.2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT).2. At this stage, the limited prayer of the Petitioner is for a direction to the Respondents to consider his case for the grant of extension of service in view of the aforesaid status now accorded to him.3. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that the period prescribed for the grant of extension may already have expired.4. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that the Petitionerhas been granted the status of battle casu...
Campos Brothers Farms vs Matru Bhumi Supply Chain Pvt Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 22.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 05.05.2026+ RFA(OS)(COMM) 3/2025 CAMPOS BROTHERS FARMS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Uttam Datt, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Mr. Kumar Bhaskar and Mr. Naman Kumar, Advs.versusMATRU BHUMI SUPPLY CHAIN PVT LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sulabh Rewari, Ms. Mansa Shukla, Mr. Shubhansh Thakur and Mr. Om Shelat, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Riya Singh, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.1. The issue which arises for consideration in the present Appealis whether a civil suit can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the premise that the cause of action has merged into a foreign arbitral award, when such award has neither attained enforceability under Part II of the Arbit...
Nafis vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 414/2017 NAFIS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Noor Alam, Advocate alongwith petitioner in personversusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh, Ms. Apoorva Khosla and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates alongwith SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Bhajan Pura Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Advocate (DHCLSC) for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.05.20261. Although the present petition was filed as an appeal, however, videorder dated 26.05.2017, this Court converted the same into a revisionpetition.2. Briefly put, the private respondents (respondents no.2, 3 and 4)stood trial in the court of Sessions in Sessions Case No. 136/2006, arising out of FIR No.315/2002 registered at PS Bhajanpura and were held guilty and convicted by judgment dated 18.08.2006 for offence punishable under Section 308 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).3. By order on ...
Rajinder Jain & Ors vs State & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 153/2016, I.A. 250/2024, I.A. 10054/2024, I.A. 13331/2025, I.A. 15405/2025 & I.A. 8069/2026 RAJINDER JAIN & ORS .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Naresh Thanai and Ms. Khushboo Singh, Advs.versusSTATE & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Mr. Ashok Sabharwal and Mr. Shobhit Sabharwal, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Adv. for D-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.05.20261. The present suit is filed under Section 92 of the Code of CivilProcedure, 1908 with the following prayer: a) Remove defendant no. 2 as Pradhan Trustee of the Trust namely, Shri Bashi Ram Viro Devi Jain Charitable Trust; b) or alternatively, restrain defendant no.2 from writing letters to bank, authority or any other organization or to cause interference in functioning/activities of trust in any manner whatsoever, except by way of decisions taken unanimously or with the majority of existing trustees namely, pl...
Mahesh @ Lala vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 217/2026 MAHESH @ LALA ..... Applicant Through: Ms. Shweta S. Kumar, Adv. (through VC)versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. with SI Pardhan S, PS: Karol Bagh Mr. Sarthak Karol, SC (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria and Ms. Tanishka Pawar, Advs. for ComplainantCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.05.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.1105/2024 dated 30.11.2024 registered at PS.: Karol Bagh (PS), Delhi under Sections 309(4)/311/317(2)/3(5)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) read with Section 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. Succinctly put, as per prosecution story, an information wasreceived on 29.11.2024 at PS Karol Bagh regard...