Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Binod Kumar vs (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19.03.2026% Pronounced on: 05.05.2026Uploaded on: 06.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 11267/2019 SH. BINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Karan Chaudhary, AdvocatesVersus(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel GNCTD for Respondent GNCTD Mr. Rajiv Arora, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition is directed against the Award dated05.02.2019 passed in LIR No. 497/2016 (Old I.D. No. 558/11) by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereby the claim petition filed by the petitioner/workman has been dismissed.2. The case of the petitioner/workman, as set up before the learnedLabour Court, was that he had been in the continuous employment of the respondent-management since 10.06.1992 and was working as a Karig...
David vs Alok Pahuja
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 147/2025 DAVID .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Srivastava, AdvocateversusALOK PAHUJA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 05.05.20261. Learned counsel for revisionist seeks permission to withdraw this petition stating that he has paid the sentence amount before the magistrate on 29.10.2025.2. As requested, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 5, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 12:20:10...
Pradeep Mehta vs the Batukji Co-Operative Group Housing Society Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 21/2016 PRADEEP MEHTA .....Decree Holder Through: Decree Holder in person.versusTHE BATUKJI CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD .....Judgement Debtor Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.05.20261. Mr. Pradeep Mehta, Decree Holder, appears in person and submits that he has received an assurance from Mr. Ram Singh, the sole remaining Judgment Debtor, from whom a sum of 9,45,236/- remains due and payable.2. He has also handed over a photocopy of a cheque bearing No. 000005 for a sum of 1,00,000/-, which, according to him, has been issued by the said Judgment Debtor towards part payment of the aforesaid outstanding amount.3. He further submits that he has been assured that the remaining amount shall be paid within a period of eight (08) weeks from today.4. In view of the aforesaid statement and the assurance stated to have been received from the Judgment Debtor, Ram Singh, this Co...
Fvb Trade House Private Limited vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11801/2019 FVB TRADE HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anant Vijay and Ms. Shubhra Singh, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur and Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advocates. Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal and Mr. Dhawal Uniyalm, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel for GNCTD and Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Amritesh Mohanty, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 05.05.20261. The present petition is based on the statutory mandate provided under Section 54, which contemplates refund in certain cases.2. It is the case of the petitioner that though on 14th June, 2019, the refund was sanctioned, the admissible interest as provided under Section 56 is not released.3. Rightly so, it could be the noticed from the prayer clause that there is n...
Gourv @ Goldy vs State Through Sho Ps Sarita Vihar and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: April 28, 2026 % Pronounced on: May 05, 2026 + CRL.REV.P. 991/2024 & CM No.22656/2024 GOURV @ GOLDY Revisionist Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv.VersusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Divya Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr. Gourav Singha and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates with SI Asha, PS: Savita Vihar Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv. (DHCLSC) for R-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 397 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 19731, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the orderdated 23.02.20242 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Saket Courts, Delhi3 in SC No.120/2022 arising out of FIR No.448/2021 dated 24.12.2021 registered at PS: Sarita Vihar, whereby charges have been framed Hereinafter CrPC Hereinafter impugned order Hereinafter Trial Court CRL.REV.P. 991/2024 Page 1 of 6 against him under Sec...
Phul Singh vs Shakuntala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 1290/2019, CRL.M.A. 42633-42634/2019 PHUL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in personversusSHAKUNTALA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zeeshan Diwan (DHCLSC) and Ms. Harsha, Advocates alongwith respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 05.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 19 of the FamilyCourts Act, 1984, the petitioner seeks to setting aside of the judgmentdated 21.04.2018 (impugned judgment) passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court (West) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (learned Family Court) in Mt. No. 65/ 2014.2. Briefly put, it is the case of the petitioner that although the petitionerand respondent got married in the year 1972, out of which two children were born, however, due to marital discord, the respondent left the matrimonial house in the year 198...
Matsya Fincap Pvt Ltd vs Govind Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 16.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 05.05.2026+ EFA(COMM) 8/2024 MATSYA FINCAP PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Gupta, AR.versusGOVIND LAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr. Gaurav, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.1. Through the present Appeal, the Appellant (Decree Holder)assails the correctness of the order dated 01.04.2024 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order], passed in EX. (COMM.) No.287/2023, whereby the learned District Judge declined to enforce the ex-parte arbitral award dated 22.10.2022 [hereinafter referred to as the Award] primarily on the ground that the receipt-cum- acknowledgement dated 16.09.2020 [hereinafter referred to as acknowledgement letter] containing the arbitration clause was not signed by the Appellant.2. The learned District Judge has held that...
Jyoti & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 15.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 08.05.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 993/2024 JYOTI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Divya Malhotra, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms Sneha Rani, Mr Abhishek Verma and Mr. Satayam Singh, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek settingaside of the judgment dated 14.09.2023 [hereafter impugned judgment] passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereafter Family Court] in CT No. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereafter Cr.P.C.].2. Vide the impugned judgment, the petitioner no. 1-wife and petitioner no. 2-minor daughter were awarded maintenance of 8,000/- and 5,000/- per month respectively, i.e., a total sum of CRL.REV.P. 993/2024 Page 1 of 12 13,000...
Sube Singh vs C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026+ CRL.A. 1063/2006 SUBE SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Birla, Mr. Parveen Kumar, Mr. Nizamuddin and Mr. Sube Singh, Advocates.versusC.B.I. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973, (the Cr.P.C.), accused no. 1 (A1) in C.C. No. 60/2001 on the file of the Court of Special Judge (CBI), Delhi, assails the judgment dated 10.11.2006 and order on sentence dated 13.11.2006 as per which he has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Section 120-B of the CRL.A. 1063/2006 Page 1 of 15 Indian Penal Code (the IPC) and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the PC Act).2. The case of the prosecution is that ...
Alaxender John & Anr. vs Gaurav Newton John & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 650/2024&I.A. 36796/2024, I.A. 9134/2026 ALAXENDER JOHN & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Shubham Dhyani, Adv., along with plaintiff nos. 1 & 2 in person Mob: 8810625200versusGAURAV NEWTON JOHN & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Defendant nos. 1 & 2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 05.05.2026 I.A. 9134/20261. The present application has been filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) jointly on behalf of the plaintiffs and the defendants for passing a consent decree on the basis of Settlement Agreement dated 01st April, 2026.2. The present suit has been filed seeking partition and permanentinjunction in respect of the property bearing No. CB-165, Ring Road Naraina, New Delhi, admeasuring 521 sq. yards (suit property), wherein, the parties are the co-owners.3. During the pendency of the present suit, the parties herein vide orderdated 28th July, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 424
- 425
- 426
- 427
- 428
- 430
- 431
- 432
- 433
- 434
- Next ›
- Last »