Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaksons Developers (P) Ltd vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 349/2023 JAKSONS DEVELOPERS (P) LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Utsav Garg, Ms. T Rampal, Ms. Nikita Gupta, Ms. Samvartika Pathak & Mr. Pushkar Khanna, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashistha, Mr. Siddhartha Goswami, Mr. Krish Bhatia & Mr. Aditya Sachdeva, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANJUDGMENT1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) seeking setting aside/modification of the arbitral award dated 25.04.2023 (for brevity the award) alongwith addendum dated 21.05.2023.2. The facts shorn of unnecessary details are that the respondent/Delhi Development Authority (DDA) invited bids for commercial plot No. 3B1, Twin District Towers, Rohini (admeasurin...
Anwar Inamuddin Khan vs M/S Shiv Om Polymers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1072/2025 & CM APPL. 35952/2025 ANWAR INAMUDDIN KHAN .....Petitioner Through: None.versusM/S SHIV OM POLYMERS .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 05.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 5, 2026/sds/tp At 2:45 P.M.3. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being called twice.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 5, 2026/sds/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:41:59...
Sube Singh vs C.B.I.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1063/2006 SUBE SINGH .....Appellant Through: Ms. Prerna Gupta, Mr. Shubham Gupta and Mr. Praveen Gupta, Advocates.versusC.B.I. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP, CBI with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 18.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 15853/20261. The application under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking deferment of execution of sentence for a period of three months to enable him to approach the Honble Supreme Court.2. No grounds made out. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J MAY 18, 2026/mj/er...
Hari Shankar vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 19.03.2026Pronounced on: 05.05.2026Uploaded on: 06.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 11179/2019 HARI SHANKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Karan Chaudhary, AdvocatesversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel GNCTD for Respondent GNCTD, Mr. Rajiv Arora, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition is directed against the Award dated06.02.2019 passed in LIR No. 2404/16 (Old I.D. No. 546/11) by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereby the claim of the petitioner-workman seeking reinstatement with back wages has been dismissed.2. The case of the claimant, as set out in the claim petition, is that he was employed with the respondent-management as a Sample-man and was drawing wages of Rs. 5,000/- per month, w.e.f. 03.12.2002 and continued inW.P. 11179...
Sushant Gambhir & Ors. vs Mrj Infratech Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~57 & 58* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 05.05.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 237/2025, I.A. 15564/2025, I.A. 15565/2025 & I.A. 15566/2025 SUSHANT GAMBHIR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshit Sachdeva, Mr. Rohan Sehrawat & Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocates.versusMRJ INFRATECH LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vineet Jhanji, Mr. Imran Moulaey and Ms. Ritika Jhanji, Advs. + O.M.P. (COMM) 350/2025, I.A. 21491/2025 & 21493/2025 MRJ INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Jhanji, Mr. Imran Moulaey and Ms. Ritika Jhanji, Advs.versusSUSHANT GAMBHIR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akshit Sachdeva, Mr. Rohan Sehrawat Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANAVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL) Signed By:CHANCHAL O.M.P. (COMM) 237/2025 & O.M.P. (COMM) 350/2025 Page 1 of 51. These two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) ar...
Shri Ram Nayan vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19.03.2026% Pronounced on: 05.05.2026Uploaded on: 06.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 11245/2019 SHRI RAM NAYAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Karan Chaudhary, AdvocatesversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel GNCTD for Respondent GNCTD Mr. Rajiv Arora, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition is directed against the Award dated12.02.2019 passed in LIR No. 2389/2016 by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereby the statement of claim filed by the petitioner-workman came to be dismissed on the ground that the W.P.(C) 11245/2019 Pg. 1 of 8 petitioner failed to establish the existence of an employer-employee relationship with the respondent-management.2. In the claim application, it was averred that t...
Amity International School and Anr. vs the Director, Directorate of Ed ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11120/2019 & CM APPL. 71602/2025 AMITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.versusTHE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advs. for DoECORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 05.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer(s:- a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ ororder quashing and setting aside the Impugned order dated28.08.2019 issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi; 2. The facts are that the petitioners are challenging the order dated28.08.2019, which directed as under:- 1. Not to increase any fee in the name of 'Annual charges' for FY 2017-18 by considering increase in electricity expenses and consul...
All India Tennis Association vs M/S Mccoy Architectural System Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO (COMM) 170/2022 ALL INDIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pruthvi Dhinoja and Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advs. along with Authorised RepresentativeversusM/S MCCOY ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEM PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Padma Priya, Mr. Tavinder Pal Sidhu, Ms. Neetica Sharma, Ms. Saloni Jagga, Ms. Poornima Gupta, Advs. along with Mr. Mukesh Chawla, Authorised Representative of Respondent.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 05.05.2026 CM APPL. 30088/2026 (for taking on record the settlement agreement dated 02.05.2026 and disposal of the present Appeal in terms thereof)1. Both parties, along with their respective counsel, are present in Court.2. The present Application has been filed seeking disposal of thepresent Appeal in terms of a written Deed of Settlement dated 02.05.2026 [hereinafter referred to as Settlement Agreement], annexed as Annexure-A to the present Applicat...
Baptist Church Karol Bagh (Estd. 1916) and Anr. vs Baptist Union of No ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 559/2024 & I.A. No. 12342/2026 BAPTIST CHURCH KAROL BAGH (ESTD. 1916) AND ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Anjalika Sharma, Advocate (M:9717441331)versusBAPTIST UNION OF NORTH INDIA (REGD.) AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Deeptakirti Verma, Ms. Neha Sharma, Advocates for D-1 to 5 (M:9811118333)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 05.05.2026 I.A. 12342/20261. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs, seeking withdrawal of the present suit.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the plaintiffs do not wish to continue with the present suit, any further.3. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, and in view of the fact that a consent decree in a connected suit, being CS(OS) plaintiffs to withdraw the present suit.4. Learned counsel for the defendant nos. 1 to 5 submits that he has no objec...
Sh. Suraj Nath vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 19.03.2026Pronounced on : 05.05.2026Uploaded on : 06.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 11193/2019 SH. SURAJ NATH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Karan Chaudhary, AdvocatesversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. ....Respondent Through: Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel GNCTD for Respondent GNCTD Mr. Rajiv Arora, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition is directed against the Award dated13.12.2019, in LIR no. 2107/16 (old I.D. no 542/11) passed by the Ld. learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court no. IX , Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereby the claim application filed by the petitioner (hereinafter as the workman) came to be dismissed for the reason that workman failed to establish that there was employer-employee relationship between him and the respondent No. 3 (hereinafter as the management).W.P.(C) 11193/2019 Page 1 of 82. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 423
- 424
- 425
- 426
- 427
- 429
- 430
- 431
- 432
- 433
- Next ›
- Last »