Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi Kumar and Ors vs Shri Ashwani Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 97/2024 RAVI KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahat Bansal, Advocate (through VC)versusSHRI ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mrs. Tania Ahlawat with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, AdvocatesCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI ORDER % 04.05.2026 1. Mr. Rahat Bansal, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. 2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 4, 2026 snThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:55:54...
Sahil vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 283/2026 SAHIL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshya, Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Danish, PS Lahori Gate.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 04.05.2026 CRL.M.(BAIL) 618/2026 (for interim bail) Mr. Akshya, learned counsel for the applicant, does not press the present application for interim bail. The application is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. BAIL APPLN. 283/2026 1. By way of the present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 538/2025 dated 02.06.2025, registered under Sections 309(4)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Lahori Gate, District North, Delhi. 2. At the outset, Mr. Akshya states that charges have recently been framed by ...
State vs Ganga Sharan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 29.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ CRL.A. 35/2018STATE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with PSI Manjeet Dhaka, PS Seelampur.versusGANGA SHARAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay, Advocate (DHCLSC) with respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 378 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C.), the respondent/State inSessions Case No. 556 of 2009 on the file of the MetropolitanMagistrate, North East District, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, assailsCRL.A. 35/2018 Page 1 of 15the judgment dated 05.10.2013 as per which the sole accused hasbeen acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 279 and304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).2. The prosecution case is that on 04.12.1995 at 09:00 PMat G.T Road, Opposite Gurudwara New Seelampur, the accuseddr...
Raghubir Singh vs Secretary (Revenue) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ~36 + W.P.(C) 923/2025 & CM APPL. 74045/2025 RAGHUBIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat along with Dr Monisha Sehrawat, Advs. Mr Sanjay dewan Sr. Adv with Mr. Nikhil Goel and Ms. Arshia Kohli Advs. versus SECRETARY (REVENUE) & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar Mrs. Joohu Kumari Advs. ~37 + W.P.(C) 1063/2025 RAGHUBIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat alongwith Dr Monisha Sehrawat, Advs. Mr. Sanjay dewan Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Goel and Ms. Arshia Kohli Advs. versus SECRETARY (REVENUE) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar Mrs. Joohu Kumari Advs,CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN ORDER % 04.05.2026 1. This hearing has been ...
Gail (India) Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~11* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1883/2026, CM APPL. 9154/2026 & CM APPL. 9155/2026 GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Samarth Choudhary, Advocates.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh & Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 05.01.2026 passed by respondent no.1 under Section 154 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961).2. Mr. Rohit Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outsetsubmitted that the impugned order passed in exercise of the purported powers of rectification given under Section 154 of the Act of 1961 is wholly without jurisdiction and illegal on various counts.3. He submitted that what has been rectified b...
Mazin C P and Ors vs National Board of Examination in Medical Science ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1394/2026 & CM APPL. 6862/2026 MAZIN C P AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. D K Devesh, Mr. Jitesh Saluja, Advs. versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION IN MEDICAL SCIENCE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Aishwarya Srivastava, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Bishwabandhu, SC for NMC with Mr. Bipul Kumar, Ms. Nisha, Advs. for R-3/NMC Mr. Abhinav Jaganathan Adv. for R1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 04.05.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- a. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order, directing the respondent no. 2 (NTA) to provide detail / verify the details of NEET UG score card/ marks of the petitioners ; and/or b. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the NBEMS (respondent no. 1) and NMC (respondent no. 3) to accept the candidature of the pe...
Dr Rashmi Saluja vs Religare Enterprises Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 61/2025, I.A. 2372/2025, I.A. 3025/2025, I.A. 3026/2025 & I.A. 3232/2025DR RASHMI SALUJA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Ms. Aadhyaa Khanna, Mr. Jaisal Baath and Mr. Aditya Sarma, Advs. versus RELIGARE ENTERPRISES LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Nalin Kohli, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Mr. Aubert Sebastian, Ms. Ribhu Garg, Ms. Sonal Singh, Mr. Anshul Malik and Mr. Aayushmaan Arora, Advs. Mr. Major Nirvikar Singh, Mr. Rohan Batra, Mr. Rishabh Bhargava, Mr. Dhruv Sethi and Mr. Pratham Vir Agarwal, Advs. for Intervenors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN ORDER % 04.05.2026 1. Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff seeks to withdraw the present suit with liberty to file a fresh suit should any new cause of action arise. 2. The suit, along with pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.VIKAS MAHAJ...
Sh. Pawan & Ors. vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 930/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3691/2026SH. PAWAN & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Proxy Counsel.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Sohit.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0955/2021 dated 14.11.2021,registered at Police Station Binda Pur, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. As per the contents of the petition, the parties have settled all their disputesamicably and are living together in complete harmony.3. However, none of the petitioners are present today in Court.4. Respondent No.2 is present in Court alongwith her child and her father andthey submit that there is no settlement as she was m...
Anoop Kumar Soni vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 07 & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 136/2026 ANOOP KUMAR SONI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr.Arta Trana Panda & Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advs.versusDY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 07& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant invited Courts attention towardsthe memo of appeal and the grounds raised therein, duly noticed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in its order dated 02.08.2023 and pointed out that ground No.9, which was raised by the appellant before the Tribunal, has not been considered and decided at all.2. He submitted that after the Tribunal decided appellants appeal, amiscellaneous application was moved by the appellant but the Tribunal has rejected the same as well.3. On 18.02.2026, we had directed Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, lear...
S Sorimuthu Kani vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2381/2026 & CM APPL. 11595/2026 S SORIMUTHU KANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Varma and Mr. Saurabh Agarwal, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, SC, MCD with Ms. Riddhi Jain and Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak, Advocates for MCDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 19th February, 2026,status report has been filed on behalf of respondent/MCD. 1.1 However, the same is lying under objections. 1.2 Copy of the status report has been handed over in Court and the same is taken record.2. As per the status report, the property in question falls within thejurisdiction of DSSIIDC or I&FC Department of Delhi Government, and notMCD.3. In view thereof, counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw thepresent writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum for redressal of his griev...
- ‹ Prev
- 429
- 430
- 431
- 432
- 433
- 435
- 436
- 437
- 438
- 439
- Next ›
- Last »