Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gaurav Wadhera vs Rimple Wadhera & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 137/2022 & CM APPL. 39600/2022 GAURAV WADHERA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Ms. Shivani Bardia and Mr. Naman Arora, Advs. along with the appellant in person.versusRIMPLE WADHERA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms. Chahat Raghav, Mr. Sehaj Kataria, Ms. Shreyangana Bag, Advs. along with Ms. Rimple Wadhera in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 05.05.20261. In continuation to the order that this Court has passed yesterday i.e., 04th May,2026, the parties to the present appeal are physically present in the Court and so also their respective counsels.2. Not only the respective counsels have identified the parties but the parties have further provided their photo identity card in the form Aadhar Card for the purpose of confirmation of their identity.3. When confronted, a specific statement is made to support that they hav...
Manoj Kumar vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19.03.2026% Pronounced on: 05.05.2026Uploaded on: 06.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 11246/2019 MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Karan Chaudhary, AdvocatesversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel GNCTD for Respondent GNCTD Mr. Rajiv Arora, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition is directed against the Award dated07.02.2019 passed in LIR No. 2105/2016 (Old I.D. No. 607/14) by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereby the claim of the petitioner-workman, whereby the claim petition filed by the petitioner/workman has been dismissed.2. The case of the petitioner/workman, as set up before the learnedLabour Court, was that he had been in the employment of the respondent- management since 16.1...
Veda Vyasa D.a.V. Public School vs Sant Ram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~7(R)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3363/2007 & CM APPL. 12038/2009 VEDA VYASA D.A.V. PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSANT RAM & ORS. .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINORDER% 05.05.20261. None appears on behalf of either of the parties, despite service of Court Notice.2. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. SHAIL JAIN, J MAY 5, 2026/pd/rmThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 13:26:35...
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited vs Wockhardt Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 123/2025 DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parth Bajaj and Mr. Shakti Priyan Nair, Advocates.versusWOCKHARDT LIMITED AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pranav Vyas, Mr. Manhar Singh Saini, Mr. Sidhant Kaushik and Mr. Sankalp Singh, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC with Mr. Arnav Mittal, GP for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 05.05.2026 I.A. 12507/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC)1. This is a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (hereinafter referred to as CPC) seeking disposal of the present petition on the basis of settlement having been arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.1.2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the inter se disputes have been resolved amicably out of Court and have been recorded in writing vide the Settlement Agreement dated 23.04.2...
Rajiv Ranjan vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8093/2024, CM APPLs. 55235/2025 & 29897/2026 RAJIV RANJAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jatin Parashar and Mr. Pragyesh Pratap Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Amulya Dev Mishra, Advs. for UOICORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 05.05.2026C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition is directed against judgment dated 22 October 2020 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA2. The OA was directed against a charge sheet issued to the petitioner on 21 February 2020, initiating departmental proceedings against him.3. The Tribunal dismissed the OA on the ground that it was1 Tribunal, hereinafter Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 2 premature and that there was no occasion for the Tribunal to interfere at the charge sheet stag...
Shankar Mahapatra vs Sun Pharmaceutical Ltd and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14934/2022 SHANKAR MAHAPATRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahendra Singh, Mr. Nitin Sharma and Mr. Dileep Kumar Mishra, AdvocatesversusSUN PHARMACEUTICAL LTD AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rudra Paliwal (GP)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 05.05.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition in view of the settlement arrived at before Samadhan, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, vide Settlement Agreement dated 05.02.2026.2. He submits that the petitioner has received the Employees PensionScheme (1995) amount of Rs. 2,50,118/-. It is further confirmed that monthly pension, along with the arrears, has been credited to the petitioners bank account.3. The Settlement Agreement is taken on record and the parties are made bound by their respective obligations. No more dispute is pending between the parties.4. Leave, as prayed for, is granted.5. The pr...
Rajender Sharma vs the State (Govt of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026+ CRL.A. 610/2020 RAJENDER SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Dhruva Bhagat, AdvocateversusTHE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with SI Rahul Rathi Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate with Ms. Mansi Rao, Advocate for VictimCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973, (the Cr.P.C.) read with 383 Cr.P.C., the sole accused, in Sessions Case No. 6565/2016 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-04 (POCSO), South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, challenges the judgement dated 16.03.2020 and the order on sentence dated 26.05.2020 as per CRL.A. 610/2020 Page 1 of 25 which, he has been convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...
Jasminder Singh Sikka and Anr. vs Director of Education and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-05-2026
$~89 & 90* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11955/2019 & CM APPL. 17715/2020, CM APPL. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 11969/2019 & CM APPL. 29915/2021 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 05.05.20261. These are writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- W.P.(C) 11955/2019 Respondent No. 1 to Initiate action In terms of section 24(4)of The Delhi School Education Act, 1973 In terms of orderdated 28.08.2019;(b) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction, to theRespondent No. 1 to take over the management of the Schools in terms of Section 20 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, read with Rule 50 (xviii) of the Delhi Schools Education Rules, 1973;(c) Allow the present Petition with cost;W.P.(C) 11969/2019 Respondent No.1 to conduct an inquiry into the conduct of the Respondent No.2 & 3 along with Ms...
Vikas Garg vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 29.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 05.05.2026+ CRL.M.C. 5842/2024 VIKAS GARG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hariom, Ms. Ashu Gupta and Ms. Preeti, AdvocatesversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Gaurav Bisht and Ms. Anita Bisht, Advocates and with Inspector Ramkesh. Mr. Rakesh Patiya, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner-complainant isseeking setting aside of the order dated 17.05.2024 [hereafter impugned order], passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- 05, North-West District Rohini Courts, Delhi [hereafter Sessions Court], vide which regular bail was granted to the respondent no. 2- accused Deep Saxena, in case arising out of FIR No. 161/2022,CRL.M.C. 5842/2024 Page 1 of 8 registered at Police Station EOW, Delhi for the commissi...
M/S. Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd. vs National Highway Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 144/2019 M/S. BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. S. K. Chandwani & Mr. Sameer Chandwani, AdvocatesversusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Rajkumar Maurya, Mr. Divyansh Singh Dev and Ms. Tanisha Samantha, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 05.05.2026 EX.APPL.(OS) 3185/2022 (Dir.) in OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)1. The present Petition being OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 144/2019has been instituted under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act], read with Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [CPC], seeking the following reliefs: i) For an order of attachment prohibiting the Canara Bank, Dwarka Branch, Plot No. G-5&6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075 from making payment of the monies to the extent of Rs.6,54,89,811/- lying at the credit of the Judgment Debtor...
- ‹ Prev
- 422
- 423
- 424
- 425
- 426
- 428
- 429
- 430
- 431
- 432
- Next ›
- Last »