Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalpataru Projects International Ltd vs M S Palm Construction and Supp ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 138/2026KALPATARU PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Ravishankar, Ms. Ruhini Day, Mr. Amit Sagar, Dr. Sunil Mittal & Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs.versusM S PALM CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gautam Singh & Mr. Ritesh Bhardwaj, Advs. with Mr. Mohit Goswami, Authorized Signatory through VC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by six months, as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMAY 4, 2026ChThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of ...
Jalaj Batra vs Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 08.04.2026Judgment delivered on: 04.05.2026+ CRL.M.C. 682/2025 & CRL.M.A. 3273/2025JALAJ BATRA .....PetitionerversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....RespondentMemo of Appearance For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prasouk Jain, Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Mr. Nikhil Joshi and Mr. Vignesh, AdvocatesFor the Respondent: Mr. Anupam S. Sharrma, SPP for CBI with Mr. Prakarsh Airan and Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJUDGMENTMANOJ JAIN, J1. A supplementary charge-sheet was filed against 34 accused persons.Petitioner herein is shown as A-2 therein. He is aggrieved by order dated 27.04.2024 whereby learned Trial Court1 has taken cognizance of offences and summoned him and others.2. Let me narrate factual matrix, in brief.3. An FIR2 was registered on 20.06.2022.4. It emanated from one complaint lodged by Mr. Vipin Kumar Shukla,Deputy Ge...
Gail (India) Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1903/2026, CM APPL. 9234/2026 & CM APPL. 9235/2026 GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Samarth Choudhary, AdvocatesversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr.Shivendra Singh & Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 05.01.2026 passed by respondent no.1 under Section 154 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961).2. Mr. Rohit Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outsetsubmitted that the impugned order passed in exercise of the purported powers of rectification given under Section 154 of the Act of 1961 is wholly without jurisdiction and illegal on various counts.3. He submitted that what has been rectified by t...
Rajesh Rai vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 558/2026RAJESH RAI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Malvika Kulkarni, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Dharmveer, P.S. Dabri.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 570/2021 dated 27.07.2021, registered at Police Station Dabri, District Dwarka, Delhi, under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC].2. I have heard Ms. Malvika Kulkarni, learned counsel for theapplicant, and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The prosecution has also filed a status report dated 06.04.2026, which is on record.3. The prosecution case concerns the death of the applicants wife. Inthe FIR, as initially registered at the instance ...
Puneet Jain vs Imperia Structures Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 371/2026, I.A. 5421/2026 & I.A. 5422/2026 PUNEET JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjaneya Mishra and Mr. Abhisehk Bhaduri, Advs.versusIMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sharma, Mr. Sachin Jain and Mr. Ram Pawar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner entered into a Unit BuyersAgreement dated 17.11.2016 with the respondent for the suit premises situated at Unit No. 7010 at 7th floor in Tower A in Virtual IT Space, ad- measuring 55.74 sq. mtr. (600 sq. ft.). Disputes arose between the parties to the lis. The petitioner invoked arbitration vide notice dated 31.10.2025 under Clause 57 of the Agreement. On failure to do the needful, the present petition was filed.3. ...
Shree Bhagwan Yadav vs Shatrughan Chaudhary
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 145/2026, CM APPL. 9773/2026 (stay), CM APPL. 9774/2026 (delay), CM APPL. 9775/2026 (Exemption)SHREE BHAGWAN YADAV .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHATRUGHAN CHAUDHARY .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 04.05.20261. None appears on behalf of the parties.2. The Appeal, as well as, the Applications, is dismissed in default andfor non-prosecution.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.MAY 04, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 12:39:23...
Ajay vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 724/2026AJAY.....Petitioner Through: Mr.Karan Verma, Mrs.Nayan & Mr.Yuvraj, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) for the State with Ms.Priyam Agarwal & Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. along with Insp. Parveen Kumar and SI Rajendra Kumar, ANTF/Crime Branch Mr.Neeraj Kumar, CGSC forR-2/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 04.05.20261. On 30.04.2026, we had reserved liberty in the petitioner toagitate all issues of his alleged illegal detention in appropriate proceedings, including before the learned Single Judge, where we were informed that the petitioner had already filed an application seeking bail.2. As far as compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Courtin Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh & Ors., (2021) 1 SCC 184, is concerned, we had inquired from the learned Standing Counsel for ...
Vipin Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 672/2026, CRL.M.A. 13942/2026, CRL.M.A. 13943/2026 VIPIN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kappil Chandna, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Mr. Tarun Gahlot, Advocate for complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 04.05.2026 Mr. Kappil Chandna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition since chargesheet has been filed, with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned sessions court. The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JMAY 4, 2026/akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR co...
M/S Pratap University & Ors. vs Shri Manavjit Singh Sandhu & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~43 to 45* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 475/2026 & CM APPL. 14304/2026 44. + CM(M) 476/2026 & CM APPL. 14306/2026 45. + CM(M) 477/2026 & CM APPL. 14308/2026 DR. SL GROVER & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, at this stage, the presentpetitions have become infructuous. It is, accordingly, prayed that the present petitions be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed ofRAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMAY 4, 2026/nd/abk...
Bhupinder Singh @ Titu vs the State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19.03.2026Pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ CRL.A. 708/2002 BHUPINDER SINGH @ TITU .....Appellant Through: Ms. Arundhati Katju, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae) with Ms. Ritika Meena, Adv.sversusTHE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with Mr. Manvendra Yadav, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTRAVINDER DUDEJA, J.1. The present appeal under Section 374 of the Code of CriminalProcedure, 1973 [Cr.P.C.] is filed by the appellant against theJudgment of Conviction dated 12th August, 2002 and the Order onSentence dated 16th August, 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi [Trial Court] in Sessions Case No. [IPC] at Police Station Janak Puri.2. Vide order dated 30th August, 2005, the sentence awarded to theSigned By:VAISHALICRL.A. 708/2002 Page 1 of 20appellant was suspended, subject to him furnishing a per...
- ‹ Prev
- 430
- 431
- 432
- 433
- 434
- 436
- 437
- 438
- 439
- 440
- Next ›
- Last »