Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.raghubir Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Jay Kant Mishra vs.m/s S Chand & Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2019 + CM(M) 1126/2019 JAY KANT MISHRA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advocate. versus M/S S CHAND & CO LTD & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CM APPL. 34286/2019(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1126/2019 1. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 22.05.2019 passed by the Additional District Judge-12 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS/DJ No.1446/2017 whereby the Trial Court has held that the suit instituted by the petitioner herein is barred by the principle of res-judicata in terms of Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter, the CPC).2. The suit filed by the petitioner was for declaration, possession and mandatory and permanent injunction in respect of the first floor of the CM(M) 1126/2019 Page 1 of 8 Property ...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.davender Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Jitender Kumar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 789/2019 JITENDER KUMAR ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Nandwani, Advocate with petitioner in person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Jitender Ms. Vyoma Gaur, Advocate for R-2 with R- 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.11.2008. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.1133/2015 having been registered on 27.10.2015 by police station K.N. Katju Marg on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner). On conclusion of the investigation, police fi...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ram Kishan and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.manjeet Singh Gahlot and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.jaheer Ahmed and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.jitender Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Cargo Planners Limited vs.alpasso International Engineering Company & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~OS-1 * % + CS(COMM) 127/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. 07.2019 CARGO PLANNERS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Atul Agarwal and Mr.Rakesh Kr.Khare, Advs. with AR of the plaintiff. versus ALPASSO INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING COMPANY & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Adarsh Tripathi and Ms.Ruchi Mishra, Advs. for D-1 & 2. Mr.Pawan Upadhyay and Mr.Rajesh Chhetri, Advs. for D-3. Mr.Anish Gupta, Adv. for D-4. Mr.A.K.Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Adarsh Tripathi and Mr.Ashutosh Singh, Advs. for D-6 & 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA Nos.10355/2019 and 103556/2019 1. IA No.10355/2019 is filed by defendant No.7 under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC for rejection of the plaint. IA No.10356/2019 is filed under the same provisions by defendant No.6 for rejection of the plaint.2. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.7,04,30,346/- against the defendants. The case of the plaintiff is that defendant No.3 ent...
Union of India & Anr vs.national Cooperative Consumers Federation of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :31. t July, 2019 + LPA542019 and CM Nos. 4116-4117, 4121/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumari Tiwari, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advs. versus NATIONAL COOPERATIVE CONSUMERS FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. Aneesh Sadhwani and Ms. Anu Shrivastava, Advs. for Brijender Singh CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER3107.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM Nos.4117/2019 and 4121/2019 (condonation of delay) 1. These applications have been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing and refiling the appeal. LPA542019 Page 1 of 3 2. Having heard Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant and looking into the reasons stated in these appl...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »