Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shail Bala Chauhan vs.director of Education & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % LPA4282017 Date of Decision:31. 07.2019 ..... Appellant + SHAIL BALA CHAUHAN Through: Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Advocate. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zahid Hanief and Mr. Naushad for Ahmed Khan, Advocates GNCTD/DOE. Mr. N.K. Kapoor, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present LPA is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 24.1.2017. The appellant was working as an Assistant Librarian at the time when the writ petition was filed in the year 2005. The appellant filed the writ petition, being W.P.(C) No.9841/2005, seeking the following prayers:-"a) To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent No.1 to discharge their statutory obligation under section 10 read with Section 4 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 so as to compel the respondent No.2 and 3 to maintain p...
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs.mohanjit Singh (Deceased) Throu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.20/2016 & CM Nos.3865/2019 (for interim directions), Reserved on :18.07.2019 Date of Decision :31. 07.2019 8187/2019 (for stay), 8188/2019 (for exemption) & 1791/2019 (u/s 340 Cr.P.C.) HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD........ Petitioner Through: Mr.V.K. Garg, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Noopur Dubey & Mr.Rikesh Singh, Advs. versus MOHANJIT SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with & Sachdeva Mr.Dhiraj Mr.Gurmehar Sistani, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the tenant, assails the judgment and decree dated 09.10.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Central Delhi in Civil Suit No.40/09, whereby the suit preferred by the respondent/landlord for possession of the suit property along with mesne profits, has been decreed against the appellant.2. A piece of land admeasuring...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.mathen Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~51 - 61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5106/2017 & CM Appls. 21844/2017, 40941/2017 51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates PHOOL SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus KARAMVIR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents W.P.(C) 5...
Union of India vs.m/s Pradeep Vinod Constructions Co. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + O.M.P. 34/2008 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate. (M: versus 9313649228) M/S PRADEEP VINOD CONSTRUCTIONS CO. & ORS. Through: Mr. S. W. Haider and Ms. Pooja Dua, ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Advocates. (M:93113. 7710) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 9576/2019 (for restoration) 1. The present petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with a detailed order dated 2nd July, 2019. Ld. counsel for the Union of India (hereinafter Railways) has entered appearance after that and filed the present application seeking restoration of the petition and setting aside of the order dated 2nd July, 2019. I.A. is allowed and the petition is restored to its original number.2. I.A. is disposed of in the above terms. O.M.P. 34/2008 3. The parties have been heard on merits.4. The present petition challenges the award dated 12th October, 2007 passed by a three member...
Xstrata Coal Marketing Ag vs.dalmia Bharat (Cement) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. 07.2019 EX.P. 334/2014 XSTRATA COAL MARKETING AG ..... Decree Holder Through : Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant Pakhiddey, Ms. Shivi Sethi, Mr. Subhro P. Mukherjee and Ms. Raka Chatterjee, Advs. DALMIA BHARAT (CEMENT) LTD versus ..... Judgement Debtor Through : Mr. D. Kishore Kumar, Adv. for for Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Adv. judgment debtor. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Mr. Ashutosh Senger, Mr. Adnan Siddiqui and Ms.Adeeba Mujahid, Advs. for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) Via the captioned execution petition, the decree holder seeks 1. execution of two foreign awards dated 30.01.2014 and 30.04.2014. The first award i.e. the award dated 30.01.2014 relates to the merits of the matter while the second award is limited to costs.2. The record shows that the judgment debtor had filed objections under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short ...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.balwan Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~51 - 61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5106/2017 & CM Appls. 21844/2017, 40941/2017 51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates PHOOL SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus KARAMVIR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents W.P.(C) 5...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.silak Ram and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ramesh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
R D vs.b D
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:31. 07.2019 $~28 * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 149/2018 R D B D Through: Ms. Susmita Mahal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Trilok Chand, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal arises out of an interim order dated 18.04.2018 passed by the Family Court whereby two applications filed by the appellant-wife; one under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as HMA) seeking maintenance for herself and the second application under Section 26 of HMA seeking custody of the two minor children have been dismissed.2. The brief facts of the case to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 20.02.2006 at Delhi. Two children were born out of the said wedlock, who are aged about 9 years and 11 years respectively. The parties are living separately s...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.kallu Ram and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »