Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Simplex Projects Ltd. Vs.national Buildings Construction Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8943/2016 & CM No.36356/2016 M/S SIMPLEX PROJECTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr S. D. Singh and Ms Meenu Singh, Advocates. versus NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Abir Phukan and Ms Vaishali Goyal, Advocates for R-1/NBCC. Mr Praveen Kumar Jain and Mr Shitij Chakravarty, Advocates for R-3. Mr Buddy A. Rangandhan, Advocate for R-4/SBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3007.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Mr Ranganthan, learned counsel who appears for respondent no.4 points out that respondent no.4 has merged with the State Bank of India and, therefore, the Memo of Parties needs to be corrected. In view of the above, the Memo of Parties is amended and State Bank of Travancore Ltd. is replaced by State Bank of India Ltd. as respondent No.4.2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, W.P.(C) 8943/2016 Page 1 of 9 impugning a letter dated 19.09.2016 issu...
Sushma Chauhan vs.ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~11 * + W.P.(C) 706/2016 SUSHMA CHAUHAN Date of decision:30. 07.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Y.P. Sharma, Adv. versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms.Shivani Vij & Ms.Dacchita Shahi, Advs. for GNCTD. Mr.S.D. Singh, Adv. with Ms.Meenu Singh, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Praveen Khattar, Adv. with Mr.Bapi Das, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the office order dated 08.07.2015 issued by the respondent no.2 whereby the services of the petitioner has been dispensed with.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner got diploma in general nursing & midwifery from Rajasthan nursing council. The petitioner was registered with the said council vide nurse registration no.30322, midwife W.P.(C) 706/2016 Page 1 of 6 registration no.11294 dated 29.11.2006, valid upto...
Vistra Itcl(india) Limited & Anr. Vs.lalit Kumar Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:30. h July 2019 + CS(COMM) 288/2019, I.A. 8023/2019, I.A. 8822/2019 I.A. 8823/2019 & I.A. 8824/2019 VISTRA ITCL(INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri and Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, Mr. Rajender Singh, Mr. Hardeep Sachdeva, Mr. Rajinder Singh, Mr. Kamal Shanker, Ms. Priyamvada Shenoy, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Parag Maini, Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Mr. Gautam Kumar Bhargava, Ms. Swati Singh, Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Ms.Mehak Khurana and Mr. Aman Sharma, Advs. versus LALIT KUMAR JAIN & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocates and Mr. Nikhil Rohtagi, Mr. Shashank and Mr.Raghvanedra M. Bajaj, Advs. for D- 1 to 3. Khurana CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 This order, decides a limited issue as to whether the order dated 28th May 2019, as modified on 9th July 2019, should be further var...
Abdul Jabbar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~ 35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h July, 2019 + CRL.A. 887/2002 and Crl. M.A. 12247/2019 and 31654/2019 ABDUL JABBAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.A. Khan, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Sumit Kumar, Spl. Cell Janakpuri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant Abdul Jabbar was brought to trial in the court of Sessions (in Sessions no.64/2001) with two others (Mohd. Asgar Konshi and Gurinderjeet Singh) on the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (no.168/2001) of police station Parliament Street involving offences punishable under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 123 of the Indian Penal code, 1860 and Sections 3,4 & 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908. At the conclusion of the said trial, he (the appellant) and the other said two were found...
Fayaz Khan vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~3. * + % W.P.(C.) No.7819/2017 FAYAZ KHAN Date of Decision:30. 07.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Javed Ahmad, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek monetary compensation of Rs. 5 crores from the respondents. The case of the petitioner that he was appointed as Naib Subedar (RT) with the rank of Junior Commissioned Officer in 25th Battalion Rajput Regiment on 18.09.1997. Sometime in July, 2003 the petitioners father, who was a retired principal visited the... Petitioners Unit. He states that his father left from Gauhati where the petitioner was posted, for his home town in Shahjhanpur, UP. On 08.07.2003, during the course of his travel, his father W.P.(C.) No.7819/2017 P...
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.piyush Kumbnani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 07.2019 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD... Appellant Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate. MAC.APP. 253/2018 $~108 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) PIYUSH KUMBNANI & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Kundan Kr. Lal, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS with Respondent No.1 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. The compensation awarded to respondent no.1 is impugned on the ground that the learned Tribunal has erred in not attributing contributory negligence on the claimant respondent no.1. The motor vehicular accident took place on 18.09.2014 between a two-wheeler scooty being ridden by the claimant and the insured vehicle, a four-wheeler Ford Eco Sport car. The appellant contends that the injured has admitted in his cross-examination on 08.03.2017, that he was coming from the wrong side of the road.2. Ms. Prerna Mehta, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that insofar as the motor-cyclist admits to d...
Sumit Rai @ Subodh Rai vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 578/2017 SUMIT RAI @ SUBODH RAI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT2907.2019 For being found in possession of 100 kg ganja (cannabis), at 7:15 AM on 27th April, 2013, the appellant Sumit Rai @ Subodh Rai stands convicted, vide judgment dated 4th March, 2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) under Section 20(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act). Consequently, vide order dated 10th March, 2015, the appellant has been sentenced, by the learned ASJ, to suffer, 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) alongwith fine of 1 lakh, with default simple imprisonment of 6 months. He has been extended the benefit of Section 428 of the Code of ...
Cbi vs.dr. J. S. Dhupia and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. h July, 2019 + 1. CRL.M.C. 4442/2015 DR. ANBUMANI RAMADOSS ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Gupta Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vibhor Garg, Mr. Tushar Gupta and Mr. Sumit Kr. Mishra, Advocates. versus SUPDT. OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ACU.II, SPE, DELHI-1 ...Respondents + 2. CRL.M.C. 5003/2015 Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, SPP for CBI. SURESH SINGH BHADORIA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitendra Kumar, Mr. Rakesh Samrendra, Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh & Ms. Rekha, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI ...Respondents Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, SPP for CBI. CRL.M.C. Nos. 4442/2015, 5003/2015, 5005/2015, 5007/2015 & 58/2017 & CRL.REV.P. 38/2016 Page 1 of 33 + 3. CRL.M.C. 5005/2015 NITIN GOTHWAL ...Petitioner Through: Ms. Rebecca M. John, Mr. N. Hariharan & Mr. Vikas Pahwa Sr. Advocates with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra, Mr. Kushdeep Ga...
M/S Cement Corporation of India Ltd vs.bina Mendiratta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:29. h July, 2019 + RSA242018 & CM APPL Nos.5694-95/2018 M/S CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sachin Dutta, Senior Advocate Pandey, Mr.Kailash with Advocates. versus BINA MENDIRATTA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Vijay Zaveri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This Regular Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 10.03.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge/South-East District03, Saket Courts, New Delhi/ (hereinafter as the First Appellate Court) in RCA No.11/2016 against the judgment and decree dated 02.04.2016 passed by the learned Trial Court in CS No.308/2014.2. The brief facts are the appellant was a tenant in flat No.101-B, First Floor, 87, Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 (hereinafter the subject premises) having a covered area of 475 square feet approximately, let out on 29.09.1992 for a monthly rental of ...
Sh Rajinder Kumar Kapur & Anr. Vs.sh Madan Mohan Lal Kapur & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 2497/2015, I.As. 17328/2015 & 15479/2016 SH RAJINDER KUMAR KAPUR & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv B. Samiyar, Advocate (M:9811343911) versus SH MADAN MOHAN LAL KAPUR & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajbir Singh and Mr. Deepank, Advocates for D-1.(M:9717394060) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) IA.10601/2016 (u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by Defendant No.1 seeking rejection of the plaint on two grounds - that the suit lacks cause of action and that the suit is time barred.2. Late Shri Kundan Lal Kapur had three sons and four daughters. The Plaintiff is one of the grandsons of deceased Shri Kundal Lal Kapur. The three sons of the deceased are Late Shri Shiv Kumar Kapur, Mr. B. C. Kapur and Mr. M. M. L. Kapur Defendant No.1. Shri Kundan Lal Kapur passed away on 14th Septe...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »