Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.ajay Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h July, 2019 Decided on:31. t July, 2019 ITA8282005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue versus RAJIV GUPTA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mr. Kislaya Parashar AND ITA8332005 and Ms. Umang Luthra, Advocates COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue versus AJAY KUMAR GUPTA ... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mr. Kislaya Parashar and Ms. Umang Luthra, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are by the Revenue and are directed against the ITA8282005 & 833/2005 Page 1 of 8 common order dated 27th January, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA Nos. 3919/Del/2001 and 3920/Del/2001 for the Assessment Year (AY) 1998-99.2. In ITA No.828/2005 while admitting the a...
Rakesh Seksaria & Ors. Vs.the Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
versus ........ Petitioners RAKESH SEKSARIA & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr.P.S.Patwalia, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajshekhar Rao and Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocates. $~34 * + W.P.(C) 4256/2015 and CM APPL. 15937/2015 (interim direction) Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Mr.Soumaua Karmakar, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Karan Bharihoke, Ms.Anusha Nagarajan and Ms.Zehra Khan, Advocates for R3. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT3107.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The four children of late Shri Radheshyam Makhanilal Seksaria have filed this writ petition praying inter alia that a direction should be issued to the Union of India and the Ministry of Urban Development (MOUD) (Respondent No.1) to derequisition the immovable property at No.3, Man Singh road, New Delhi (hereafter the property in question) under Section 6 (2) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable ...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.balbir Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~51 - 61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5106/2017 & CM Appls. 21844/2017, 40941/2017 51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates PHOOL SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus KARAMVIR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents W.P.(C) 5...
M/S Jage Ram Karan Singh & Anr vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h July, 2019 Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 82/2013 M/S JAGE RAM KARAN SINGH & ANR Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Pipaniya & Ms. Mahima Choudhary, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for Urvashi the State. Bhatia, Ms. respondent Advocate No.2 with respondent No.2 in person for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.... Petitioners have assailed the order dated 05.12.2012 (hereinafter 1. referred to as the impugned order) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Court) in Crl. Appeal No.57/2012, whereby the respondent No.2 was acquitted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act, in short) and the judgment of conviction dated 11.07.2012 and order on sentence dated 17.07.2012 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Crl.Rev.P.82/2013 Page 1 of 1...
Basant Dabas vs.govt of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~60 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9849/2015 BASANT DABAS ........ Petitioner Through Dr Kumar Jwala, Mr Sourabh Pandey, Advocates. versus GOVT OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI. Ms Sonam Anand, Mr Yakesh Anand, Mr Akshay Thakur, Advocates with Mr Dhruv, UDC for R2 and R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER3107.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that directions be issued to the respondents to verify and reimburse the medical claim of Rs. 6,29,564/- to the petitioner. The said medical claim relates to the treatment of the petitioner at Paras Hospital, C-1, Sushant Lok, Sector-43, Gurgaon (hereafter the Hospital).2. The petitioner states that he is a permanent employee in a private company known as Special Spring (India) Pvt. Ltd.. The petitioner is an Employees State Insurance (ESI) Cardholder and hence is covered under the said Scheme (ESI Scheme). W.P.(C...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.h.s. Tyagi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dy Labour Commissioner District S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.kishan and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Mohit Sharma vs.all India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~14. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA4882019 and CM APPL. 33649/2019 (stay) 1. MOHIT SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Jain, Mr. Harsh Jain and Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Advocates versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dushyant Parashar, Advocate for AIIMS. Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 22.07.2019, ORDER3107.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing a writ petition filed by him for issuing a writ of mandamus to the respondent No.1/All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) for granting him admission in the MBBS-2019 Course under the OBC quota and for declaring Condition No.3 stipulated in the Prospectus, as redundant.2. First, a glance at the undisputed facts of the case. On 19.2.2019, respondent No.1/AIIMS issued a Prospectus inviting applications for admission in AIIMS...
Man Mohan Pandey and Ors. Vs.bharat Electronics Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 8188/2019 & CM APPLs. 33934-35/2019 1. MAN MOHAN PANDEY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath with Mr.Mahavir Rawat and Mr. Rohit Prasad, Advs. versus BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Manish Paliwal, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Ms. Kritika Srivastava and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. for R-1&2 Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Girish Pandey, Axdvs. for R-3 Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing all the three chargesheets-cum-suspension orders dated 17.05.2019 issued against the petitioners. Consequently, revoke the suspension and reinstate the petitioners with all the due benefits in their respective offices as WP (C) 8188/2019 Page 1 of 7 they were before the suspension or in alternatively transf...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »