Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 31 2019

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.rajiv Gupta

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2019

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h July, 2019 Decided on:31. t July, 2019 ITA8282005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue versus RAJIV GUPTA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mr. Kislaya Parashar AND ITA8332005 and Ms. Umang Luthra, Advocates COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue versus AJAY KUMAR GUPTA ... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mr. Kislaya Parashar and Ms. Umang Luthra, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are by the Revenue and are directed against the ITA8282005 & 833/2005 Page 1 of 8 common order dated 27th January, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA Nos. 3919/Del/2001 and 3920/Del/2001 for the Assessment Year (AY) 1998-99.2. In ITA No.828/2005 while admitting the a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2019

Smt Shailender Kaur & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2019

#4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 2099/2019 & CRL.M.A. 32309/2019 SMT SHAILENDER KAUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Mir Akhtar Hussain with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Pant, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ......... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for State. Mr. Manish ACP/Crime with SHO/Insp. Joginder Singh, Insp. Ram Kishan, PS Sagarpur. Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present writ of habeas corpus has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to produce... Petitioners No.1 to 10 before this Court. The present writ petition is supported by an affidavit filed on 29th July, 2019 by... Petitioner No.11 who states that she is a Parokar of... Petitioner Nos. 1 to 10. Page 1 of 11 W.P.(Crl.) 2099/2019 2. The gravamen of the present writ petition filed ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2019

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.diwan and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2019

$~51 - 61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5106/2017 & CM Appls. 21844/2017, 40941/2017 51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates PHOOL SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus KARAMVIR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents W.P.(C) 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2019

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.satish Kumar & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~16 * % + MAC.APP. 1074/2018 & CM Nos. 50452/2018, 13084/2019, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD342222019 Decided on:31. 07.2019 Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus SATISH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yogesh Dagar and Mr. Ashok Kansal, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that there is contributory negligence on the part of the injured victim, which has not been considered in the impugned order. The respondent no.1 claimant was riding on a motorcycle when he met with an accident in a head-on collision with a motor car insured by the appellant. The Detailed Accident Report (DAR) was considered in the impugned order as under:-"2. According to DAR, on 11.10.2015 at about 10:00 pm, the petitioner was going back to Sonepat f...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2019

m.c.d. Vs.its Workmen Represented by Hospital Employees Union

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2019

$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2019

Smt Shanti Devi vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2019

#3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 1937/2019 SMT SHANTI DEVI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Mir Akhtar Hussain with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Pant, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ......... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for State. Mr. Manish ACP/Crime with SHO/Insp. Joginder Singh, Insp. Ram Kishan, PS Sagarpur. Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (ORAL) 1. Present writ of habeas corpus and compensation has been filed by the petitioner-mother seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the alleged detenu Mr. Sumit, son of Shri Om Prakash, resident of B-1/114, JJ Colony, Raghubir Nagar, Delhi before this Court.2. In the present petition it had been averred that the petitioners son was in the illegal detention of the SHO, Police Station Sagarpur from 15th July 2019 3.30 p.m. It had also ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2019