Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.gopal Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.lekh Raj and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.chetman Giri and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.om Prakash and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Cosco (India) Limited vs.paramsukh Nirman Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t July, 2019 + CS (COMM) 1051/2018 COSCO (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Mr. Nishant Datta & Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocates (M-9811125100) PARAMSUKH NIRMAN PVT. LTD. versus ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Renuka Arora & Mr. Arun, Advocates (M-9958307722) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 10128/2019 1. By this application, ld. counsel for the Plaintiff wishes to raise further grounds in the OA. The said grounds shall be considered while deciding the OA. I.A. is disposed of. I.A. 8756/2019 (for delay) 2. The delay in filing the OA is condoned. I.A. is disposed of. O.A. 60/2019 3. The present appeal has been filed seeking setting aside of order dated 9th May, 2019 passed by the Ld. Joint Registrar, by which the written statement filed by the Defendant, along with the affidavit of admission/denial has been taken on record. The relevant dates in the present case are ...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dudhnath and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
M/S Labh Construction & Industries Ltd vs.central Govt Employees Welfa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~32 * + Date of Decision:31. 07.2019 % M/S LABH CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Appellant FAO(OS) 138/2019 Through: Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh and Mr.Nikhil Goel, Advocates versus CENTRAL GOVT EMPLOYEES WELFAR HOUSING ORGANISATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. D.Moitra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Nos.34049-50/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. C.M. No.34051/2019 Issue notice. Counsel for the respondent accepts notice. He fairly does not oppose the application. Accordingly, delay in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 138/2019 FAO(OS) 138/2019 Page 1 of 10 1. The appellant assails the order dated 23.4.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.278/2013 whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed of the objections preferred by the respondent Central Gov...
Rani Sikka & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3695/2019 RANI SIKKA & ORS Date of Order: July 31, 2019 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Hooda and Mr. Arya Sharma, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Avinesh Kumar Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.A. 32371/2019 (Exemption) ORDER (ORAL) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3695/2019 Quashing of FIR No.1025/2014 under Sections 354/509/3of IPC, registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 26th July, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared among the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the CRL.M.C. 3695/2019 Page 1 o...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.vipin Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~12 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Versus VIPIN KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Sherawat and Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for Claimants. Mr. Nitesh Singh and Ms.Laveen Arora, Advocates for DTC. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. 07.2019 CM Nos. 3607/2015, 26690/2019 in MAC.APP. 207/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate. ..... Appellant This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that it was passed by a forum which lacked jurisdiction. It is contended that section 53 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) ousts the jurisdiction of payment of any other compensation to an employee, who is covered under the said Act. Section 53 reads as under:-"53. Bar against receiving or recovery of compensation or damages under any other law.An insured person or his dependants shall not be entitled to receive or recover, whether from the employer of the insu...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -9 vs.transcend Mt Services Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~2 * + THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -9 ..... Appellant ITA2632019 Through: Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocate. versus TRANSCEND MT SERVICES PVT. LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Through: (appearance not given) ..... Respondent % ORDER3007.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Revenue is in appeal against an order dated 30th November, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA Nos.12697/Del/2014 and CO. No.163/Del/2017 for Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08.2. The facts in brief are that the Assessee is a subsidiary of Heartland Asia (Mauritius) Limited primarily engaged in the provision of IT enabled services in the area of medical transcription to its parent company in the United States of America and other Associated Enterprises (AEs).3. The Assessee filed its return of income for the AY in question on 31st October 2007. The return was picked up for scrutiny under Section 143 of ITA2632019 Page 1 of 7 the Inc...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »