Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.bharti Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ram Avatar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dhel Chand and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Dharam Singh vs.delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~68 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1977/2019 & CM No.9243/2019 1. DHARAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rupesh K. Sinha, Advocate. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby his claim was rejected.2. The petitioner was working as a driver with the respondent. On 26th July, 2004, the petitioner was on duty on bus No.3460 from Kanpur to Delhi. When the bus reached near Bilsuri police post, the bus collided with a tree on the right side of the road and it caught fire. According to the respondent, the accident occurred due to the negligence of the petitioner. The bus suffered loss to the tune of Rs.2,85,000/-. The respondent imposed penalty of stoppage of next two annual increments on the petitioner who raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Lab...
East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.kishan Lal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Shalini Khanna vs.bank of Baroda & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~70 * + Date of Decision:31. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8313/2019 & CM344302019 SHALINI KHANNA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Ms. Radhika, Ms. Parul Panthi, Ms. Shweta Saini and Mr. Anant Nigam, Advocates. Versus BANK OF BARODA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.P.Agrawal, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondent No.1 accepts notice.2. In view of the order that we propose to pass, we do not consider it necessary to direct issuance of notice to the respondents No.2 to 5.3. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 29.5.2019 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in Appeal No.468/2017 arising out of OA No.295/2014 (DRT-II, Delhi). The said appeal has been preferred by the respondent-Bank of Baroda. The Original Application No.295/2014 preferred by the respond...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.puran Mal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Glencore International Ag vs.dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. 07.2019 EX.P. 75/2015 & EX.APPL.(OS) Nos.1216-17/2015 GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG ..... Decree Holder Through : Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant Pakhiddey, Ms. Shivi Sethi, Mr. Subhro P. Mukherjee and Ms. Raka Chatterjee, Advs. versus DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LIMITED .... Judgement Debtor Through : Mr. D. Kishore Kumar, Adv. for for Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Adv. judgment debtor. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Mr. Ashutosh Senger, Mr. Adnan Siddiqui and Ms.Adeeba Mujahid, Advs. for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) Via the captioned execution petition, the decree holder seeks 1. execution of a foreign award dated 17.11.2014.2. The record shows that the judgment debtor had filed objections under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). This court dismissed the objections vide judgment dated 03.07.2017. Ex.P.No.75/2015 Pg. 1 of 9 3. The...
Tvb Marketing India Pvt Ltd vs.itc Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t July, 2019 CS(OS) 653/2015 TVB MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Varun Mishra & Mr. Karthik Sundar, Advs. ITC LTD Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anil Airi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.K. Bhushan & Ms. Sukanya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has sued the defendant, for (i) declaration that the defendant is in breach of the Marketing Agreement dated 29th August, 2011 and the plaintiff is entitled to damages for the loss suffered on account of breach, and, (ii) recovery of damages in the sum of Rs.2,00,00,100/- with pendente lite and future interest, pleading that (a) the parties entered into a Marketing Agreement dated 20th September, 1994 whereunder the defendant appointed the plaintiff as its exclusive marketing representative for its membership programme Welcom Group Sheraton Plus, for a maximum period of 24 weeks or until 4,000 memberships were ...
Mr. Kapil Nagar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2019 BAIL APPLN. 876/2019 & Crl.M.B.635/2019 MR. KAPIL NAGAR STATE Versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vishal Kumar, Mr. Sushil Kr.Dubey, Ms.Noor Rampal and Ms.Divya Nair, Advs. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP, Addl. PP for the State with Insp.Vinay Kumar, P.S.ATO/Khajoori Khas. Mr.Pradeep Teotia, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.74/2019 under Section 306 IPC, Police Station Khajuri Khas.2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the brother of the deceased. It is alleged that there was a dispute between the co- accused and the family of the deceased. FIR alleges that the co- accused Tushar Bansal, his father Pushpender Bansal and the petitioner were troubling the f...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »