Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Center of Applied Politics vs.government of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5513/2017 and CM APPL. 23200/2017 CENTER OF APPLIED POLITICS Through: Mr ........ Petitioner V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr Farman Ali, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER3007.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. impugning the orders dated 12.06.2017 and 23.06.2017 issued by the Deputy Land & Development Officer (respondent No.2 hereafter L&DO), wherein the perpetual deed of lease deed dated 02.07.1977 executed in favour of the petitioner in respect of a plot of land measuring 2000 Sq. Yds located at I.P Estate (hereafter the land in question), was cancelled and the petitioner was directed to hand over possession of the same to the concerned authorities. The aforesaid orders are, hereafter, collectively referred to...
Navig8 Chemical Pools Inc vs.nu Tek India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 05.12.2018 Judgment pronounced on 30.07.2019 + OMP(EFA)(COMM) No.2/2018 & I.A. Nos. 4269/2018,4270/2018, 14422/2018 NAVIG8 CHEMICAL POOLS INC ..... Decree Holder Through Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Mr. Mikhil Sharda, Mr. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu, and Mr. Prashant Kaushal, Advocates. versus NU TEK INDIA LIMITED .....Judgment Debtor Through Mr. Navaniti P.D. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sarthak Guru, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Prefatory Facts:1. The captioned execution petition has been filed by Navig8 Chemical Pools Inc. (hereafter referred to as NCP) to seek enforcement of the final arbitration award dated 4 June 2015 as amended by arbitration award dated 23 July 2015 (hereafter referred to as subject award). OMP(EFA)(COMM) No.2/2018 Pg.1 of 17 1.1 Interlocutory Application(I.A.)No.14422/2018 contains the objections preferred by the judgment debtor i.e. Nu...
Cadbury Uk Limited & Anr vs.lotte India Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2019 CS(COMM) 1259/2016 CADBURY UK LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Karan Bajaj, Ms. Jyotideep Kaur, Ms. Nancy Roy & Mr. K. Roda, Advs. LOTTE INDIA CORPORATION LTD Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Gaurav Pachnanda, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Ms. Eshna Kumar, Mr. Aditya Goel & Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.12329/2017(of the defendant under Section 10 CPC) & IA No.3474/2019(u/O.VI R.17 CPC filed by the plaintiffs) 1. IA No.12329/2017 of the defendant filed under Section 10 CPC and IA No.3474/2019 of the plaintiffs for amendment of the plaint are for consideration.2. Though, the senior counsel for the plaintiffs suggested that the application filed earlier in point of time being the application under Section 10 of the CPC, be taken up for consideration first, but after hearing the Senior Counsel f...
Mecamidi s.a vs.flovel Mg Holdings Private Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 228/2017 & I.A.No.10190/2018 Reserved on:12. 04.2019 Date of Decision :30. 07.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Ramni Taneja, Adv. MECAMIDI S.A FLOVEL MG HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.H.L.Tiku, Sr.Adv. Ms.Yashmeet Kaur, Adv. with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 22nd December 2016 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Award).2. The Impugned Award, holding the petitioner liable for breach of the Joint Venture Shareholders Agreement executed between the parties as well as the Articles of Association of the respondent No.2 Company, has awarded damages of Rs.1,50,00,000/- to the respondents alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. The Award further dismissed the counter claims filed by the peti...
National Buildings Constructions Corporation Ltd. Vs.j. R. Constructio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 06.12.2018 Judgment Pronounced on 30.07.2019 % + O.M.P. (COMM.) 157/2017 & I.A. 3873/2017 NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Das with Ms. Geeta Das and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advs. versus J.R. CONSTRUCTIONS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel with Mr. Monamshal Marings, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J:1. This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the 1996 Act) to assail the award dated 06.12.2016.2. Via the impugned award, the arbitral tribunal has awarded a cumulative sum of Rs.1,13,25,985/- inclusive of interest in favour of the respondent i.e. J.R. Constructions (hereafter referred to as JRC) at the rate of 12% per annum towards pre-reference and pendente lite interest. 2.1 The petition came up for hearing for the first time on 27.03.2017 when this Court, while giving...
J P Mahajan vs.governing Body Kirori Mal College Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 05.2019 Pronounced on:30. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 3663/2017 & CM APPL. No.16121/2017 J P MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ishan Jain, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus GOVERNING BODY KIRORI MAL COLLEGE DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Manav Gill, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Mohinder J S Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking prayer as under: - a) Pass a writ/order/direction quashing the Impugned Order contained in letter dated 17.02.2017 issued by respondent no.1 whereby the petitioners terminal/retirement benefits have been withheld; b) Pass an order directing respondent no.1 to release the retirement benefits comprising Gratuity, Employers contribution to CPF and W.P.(C) 3663/2017 Page 1 of 20 Leave encashment along with interest @ 18% per annum; c) Pass a Writ/order/direction quashing...
Dinesh Sharma vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 290/2019 DINESH SHARMA Represented by: Deepak Anand, ..... Appellant Advocate, DHCLSC versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta , APP ..... Respondent for State with SI Manoj the Kumar, PS Sarai Rohilla CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Dinesh Sharma challenges the impugned judgment dated 31st October 2018 convicting him for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and the order on sentence dated 1st November, 2018 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months, for offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one months, for offence punishable under Section 506 IPC.2. Assai...
R K Sharma vs.public Grievance Commission & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 07.2019 + LPA1622019 R K SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K.K. Sharma & Mr. Amit Singh Rathore, Advs. versus PUBLIC GRIEVANCE COMMISSION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, Adv. for R- 1 Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Adv. with Mr.Kapil Dutta, Adv. for SDMC/R-2 Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Bhawana Pandey & Mr.Sambit Nanda, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner in W.P.(C) 1469/2019 which was disposed of by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 13.02.2019.2. Having heard the counsels for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that as per respondent this is a case of unauthorised construction whereas as per this appellant (original petitioner) the respondent is required to decide the legality or o...
Ct/ Gd Angad Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~8. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % W.P.(C) 5690/2015 CT/GD ANGAD KUMAR AND ORS. Date of Decision:30. 07.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. N.L. Bareja, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Mr. Virender Pratap and Mr.Pushpender Singh Charak, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Charak Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The three petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the communications dated 30.01.2014, 15.04.2014 and 10.09.2014 issued by respondent No.2 rejecting their claim for appointment to the post of Head Constable (Ministerial), in short HC (M) through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE). The petitioners also seek a mandamus to the respondents to consider them for appointment to the said post of HC (M) on the basis of their participation in the LDCE recruitment process 2012-13. W.P.(C) 5690/2015 Page...
Rajan Kochhar & Ors vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2019
$~15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th July, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1733/2019 RAJAN KOCHHAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Lovish Seth, Advocate with petitioners in person versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Sunil Kumar Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 02.12.2009. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.79/2018 having been registered on 01.03.2018 by police station Kirti Nagar on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »