Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Dabur Invest Corp vs.addl. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~47 * + W.P.(C) 7909/2019 & CM Appl. No.32777/2019 (interim relief) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.P. Rastogi, Mr. Rohit Jain, Mr. versus K.N.Ahuja, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Ms. Kannopriya Gupta &Mr.Manu K. Giri, Advocates M/S DABUR INVEST CORP ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Sr. Standing counsel & Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Junior standing counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER3107.2019 1. This is a petition by M/s Dabur Invest Corp, questioning the order dated 15th January, 2019 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Special Range-16 (Respondent No.1) under Section 281-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) ordering the assets of the... Petitioner mentioned in the order to be kept under provisional attachment for a period of six months. The challenge is also to an order dated 19th June, 2019 passed by Respondent No.1 declining to ...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.karamvir and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~51 - 61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5106/2017 & CM Appls. 21844/2017, 40941/2017 51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates PHOOL SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus KARAMVIR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents W.P.(C) 5...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.kaptan Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~51 - 61 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5106/2017 & CM Appls. 21844/2017, 40941/2017 51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates PHOOL SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus KARAMVIR AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate respondents W.P.(C) 5...
Rakesh Signh vs.dheeraj & Ors (New India Assurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~85 * % + MAC.APP. 413/2018 RAKESH SIGNH versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocate.1. DHEERAJ & ORS (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey and Ms. Shuchi Singh, Advocates for R3. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.22,14,000/- has been awarded to him. The appellant is seeking enhancement of the award amount.2. On 02nd July, 2017 at about 11:40 A.M., the appellant was returning home after finishing his work when he was hit by vehicle No.UP77 8517 near Thakur Hotel, Delhi Darbar Road, Bhajanpura, Delhi. The accident resulted in grievous injuries and his left arm was crushed. The appellant was taken to GTB Hospital where his left arm was amputed due to the injuries suffered. The permanent disability of the app...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.chandan Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.raghuveeer and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.govind Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.suresh Chand and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~3 - 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8812/2007 3 M.C.D. Through: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ITS WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8096/2015 4 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus KALLU RAM AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 8097/2015 & CM No.16764/2015 5 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing counsel for SDMC with Mr. Mohit Dagar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 8812/2007 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 RANBIR SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Ms. Sugandh Kochar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8099/2015 & CM No.16768/2015 6 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, S...
Surana Telecom and Power Ltd vs.mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 493/2013 Date of Decision :31. t July, 2019 SURANA TELECOM AND POWER LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Amarjeet Singh, Adv. versus MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD..... Respondent Through: Ms.Vandana Bhatia and Mr.Sarthak Bhatia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 34 of 1. the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11.04.2013 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Purchase Order dated 30.05.2005 as amended on 05.12.2005 and the Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) dated 22.12.2007, executed between the parties.2. By way of the Purchase Order dated 30.05.2005, the respondent had placed an order of 75,000 Handheld WLL Subscriber Terminals of CDMA2000IX Technology (Model No.C-300 Huawei make with OMP...
Janta College of Pharmacy vs.all India Council for Technical Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P. (C) 6643/2019 & CM APPL.28071/2019 Judgment reserved on :26. 07.2019 Date of decision :31. 07.2019 JANTA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chander Shekhar, Avocate versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel and Mr. Abhinav Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner the Janta College of Pharmacy vide the present writ petition seeks the quashing of the order dated 25.04.2019 bearing No.F.No.Northern/1-4263341465/EOA and also the quashing of the order dated 07.05.2019 bearing No.F.No.AICTE/AB/NR/PID-1- 2496405271/2019-20 of the AITCTE of the Advisory-II Approval Bureau. The petitioner also seeks issuance of directions to the AICTE to issue an EOA with 100 seats for the B. Pharma course or another opportunity for hearing be given to it before the SAC for the academic year 2019-2...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »