Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Aggarwal` vs.raj Kumar Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h April, 2019. CS(OS) 36/2019 SANDEEP AGGARWAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. D.S. Chauhan and Ms. Ruchi Singh, Advs. Versus RAJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Aman Shankar, Adv. for D-2. Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahu, Adv. for D-3&4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.5545/2019 (of defendants no.1&5 u/S151CPC) and IA No.5546/2019 (of the defendant no.2 u/S151CPC) 1. The defendants no.1&5 as well as the defendant no.2 have filed these identical applications under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking dismissal of this suit for partition inter on the ground that the Partition Deed filed by the plaintiff himself along with the plaint contains an arbitration clause.2. I have enquired from Mr. Aman Shankar, Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant/defendant no.2, whether he has heard of Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. CS(OS) 36/2019 Page 1 of 1...
Naveen & Anr vs.the State g.n.c.t of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 16, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2035/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8071/2019 MADHU KUMARI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Kaushal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rajiv Kumar. Mr. K.S. Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 2061/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8182/2019 NAVEEN & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Kaushal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE G.N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rajiv Kumar. Mr. K.S. Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 306/2018 under Sections 3of IPC and FIR No.307/2018 under Sections 323/354(B)/506/5of IPC both registered at Police Station Crl.M.C. 2035/2019 & Crl.M.C. 2061/2019 Page 1 of 3 Pul Pehladpur, De...
Syed Man Meer & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1906/2016 Decided on:-"16th April, 2019 SYED MAN MEER & ORS. ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Adv. versus Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the basis of averments in criminal complaint (CC No.55/1/2012) of the second respondent (the complainant) and the evidence led in support in the pre-summoning inquiry under Sections 200 and 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the petitioners and their father Syed Daud Meer, along with third and fourth respondents herein, were summoned by the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 17.02.2016, to appear as accused persons and face proceedings on the accusations of involvement in offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471 and 120 B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).2. It is stated that Syed Daud Meer, father of the petitioners, he being the first acc...
Runway Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs.paras Imports Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h April, 2019 CS(COMM) No.37/2019 RUNWAY LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi Kukreja Versus & Ms. Vidhi Goel, Advs. PARAS IMPORTS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Mr. Dhananjay Jain & Mr. Utkarsh Mudotiya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.1077/2019 (of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) IA No.1078/2019 (of the plaintiff under Order XL Rule 1 CPC) IA No.3631/2019 (of the defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC) IA No.4206/2019 (of the defendants under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. The plaintiff has sued defendant no.1 Paras Imports Pvt. Ltd. and its Directors defendants no.2 and 3 viz. Mr. Paras Verma and Mrs. Anita Sharma, for (a) mandatory injunction to furnish the original Bills of Lading or in the alternative, return all the goods, to the plaintiff which were imported vide consignments mentioned in the plaint; (b) directing th...
Master Vishal Kumar (Minor) and Anr vs.employees State Insurance Corpo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Appl.Side-3 $~ * + W.P.(C) 2609/2016 & CM APPL. 11034/2016 MASTER VISHAL KUMAR (MINOR) AND ANR Through Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Amicus Curiae with Ms. Sonali Malik, Advocate. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC and Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Pawan Pathak, Mr. Siddharth Singh, Mr. Ruchir R. Rai and Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yakesh Anand with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Advocates and Dr. Naresh Arora, AD (D) and Mr. Dhruv Prasad UDC for ESIC. Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel (Civil) with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for AIIMS. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Kotla Harshvardhan and Ms. Mansi Sood, Advocate for Sanofi Genzyme. % W.P.(C) 2609/2016 Date of Decision:16. h April, 2019 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has be...
Gulshan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th April, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4378/2016 GULSHAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Rawal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State Ms. Richa Dhawan, Advocate, DHCLSC for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 30.01.2012. No child took birth out of this wedlock. On 24.10.2013, the second respondent lodged first information report (FIR) no.235/2013 with police station Subzi Mandi, alleging offences punishable under Section 498A, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his mother (second petitioner) and his sister (third petitioner). On Crl. M.C. No.4378/2016 Page 1 of 8 conclusion of the investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) on which cognizance was t...
Paras Aneja & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 16, 2019 + + CRL.M.C. 2046/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8125/2019 MS. SHREYA SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocate. .....Appellants Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Parveen Kumar. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in person. CRL.M.C. 2050/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8142/2019 PARAS ANEJA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Nikhil Malhotra, Advocate. Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI Parveen Kumar. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.142/2019 under Sections 323/354/5of IPC and FIR No.141/2019 under Sections 323/354/5of IPC both registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of these FIRs, now stands c...
Triumphant Institute of Management Education Pvt Ltd vs.time Plus Inst ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 87/2019 TRIUMPHANT INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION PVT LTD Through Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Ms. Anusuya Nigam, Mr. Lakshay Kaushik, Ms. Ruchika Wadnawan & Ms. Vrinda Pathak, Advocates. versus ..... Appellant TIME PLUS INSTITUTE & ANR Through None. ........ RESPONDENTS + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH ORDER1604.2019 % CM APPLs 18201/2019 & 18202/2019 (Exemptions) 1. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 87/2019, CM APPL182002019 (stay) & CM APPL182032019 (u/O XXVI Rule 9 CPC) 3. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 08.04.2019 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on two applications being I.A. no.5138/2019 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 C.P.C. and I.A. no.5139/2019 under Order 26 Rules 9 of CPC. The learned Single Judge has declined the grant of an ad-interim ...
Dayawati vs.shis Ram (Thru Lr) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :07. 03.2019 Date of Order:16.04.2019 C.R.P. No.53/2018 & C.M. No.10816/2018 DAYAWATI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Yadav & Ms. Anita Tomar, Advocates. Versus SHIS RAM (THRU LR) & ORS. Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-1, 4, 5 & 6. Mr. Rupesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. for R-3. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 The impugned order dated 20.12.2017 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-04, South-West District, Dwarka, New Delhi (ADJ) in Civil Suit No.80/2016 dismissing the application of the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for passing a decree for recovery of Rs.45 lacs with interest against respondent No.3 on his admissions, is the subject-matter of challenge in this revision petition.2. As per the factual matrix, the petitioner filed a Civil Suit being CS (OS) No.2502/2009 for recovery of Rs.45 lacs and for partition and permane...
Sangeetha and Anr vs.employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Appl.Side-6 $~ * + W.P.(C) 8474/2017 SANGEETHA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Amicus Curiae with Ms. Sonali Malik, Advocate. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC and Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Yakesh Anand with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Advocates and Dr. Naresh Arora, AD (D) and Mr. Dhruv Prasad UDC for ESIC. Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel (Civil) with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for AIIMS. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Kotla Harshvardhan and Ms. Mansi Sood, Advocate for Sanofi Genzyme. Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advocate for respondent. W.P.(C) 8474/2017 Page 1 of 4 Date of Decision:16. h April, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present writ petition has been filed by Ms. Sangeetha. As the petitioner-patient...