Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajat Sud vs.j P Sud & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 20, 2019 Judgment delivered on: April 01, 2019 FAO(OS) 66/2018, CM No.14761/2018 RAJAT SUD Through: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi, Adv. with ..... Appellant Mr. Manish Dua, Mr. Rohit Gupta & Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs. versus J P SUD & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS with Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh & Mr. Sidharth Borah, Advs. for R-1 to R-3 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Adv. with Mr. Anurag Tirthankar, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present appeal filed by the appellant against the order dated February 01, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court striking off the proposed issue with regard to appellants share in the House No.D-8, Saket, New Delhi-110017 FAO(OS) 66/2018 Page 1 of 42 and resultantly dismissing the suit of the appellant, in respect to the said property under Order XV of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...
Praveen Kumar Kommineni vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2602/2018 PRAVEEN KUMAR KOMMINENI THE STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for Insp.Ashwani Kr, EOW. the State with Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. for the Complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.No.600/2016 under Section 379/420/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station Rajouri Garden (now investigation stands transferred to Police Station: Economic Offence Wing). Subsequently, Section 467 IPC has been added.2. In the FIR the petitioner was not named and his name has surfaced subsequently. As per the complainant, the petitioner facilitated discounting of certain letters of credit which were opened by the co-accused in favour of the complainant by forging l...
Sardar Mahinder Singh vs.sukhwant Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:20. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:1. t April, 2019 + RC.REV. 320/2016 & CM APPL No.22898/2016 SARDAR MAHINDER SINGH Through : Mr.S.P.Singh Choudhari ........ Petitioner and Mr.Y.R. Sharma, Advocates. versus SUKHWANT KAUR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Pawan K Bahl and Mr.Bharat Pankaj, Advocates with respondent in person. + RC.REV. 321/2016 & CM APPL No.22901/2016 SARDAR BALBIR SINGH Through : Mr.S.P.Singh Choudhari ........ Petitioner and Mr.Y.R. Sharma, Advocates. versus SUKHWANT KAUR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Pawan K Bahl and Mr.Bharat Pankaj, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. These revision petitions are filed for setting aside of the order dated 26.10.2015 passed by the learned Rent Controller (East), RC.REV No.320/2016 and 321/2016 Page 1 of 9 Karkardooma, Delhi whereby the applications for leave to defend of the petitioners in both the eviction petitions we...
Shivani Malik vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 04.2019 BAIL APPLN. 725/2019 SHIVANI MALIK ........ Petitioner versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. I.P. Singh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the Ankur State with SI CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks Regular bail in FIR No.632/2018 under Sections 279/337/304-A of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to an accident that took place involving the car alleged being driven by the petitioner. The offending vehicle was being driven at a very high speed. It hit a two-wheeler and then hit a divider and thereafter overturned on the opposite side and hit another vehicle and overturned on the third car. One lady lost her life whereas three persons were injured.3. MLC ...
Umesh Parashar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Pronounced on: April 01, 2019 (i) + CRL.A. 526/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1347/2017 SURESH KUMAR LAKRA Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Tiwari & Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 523/2016 PIYUSH GOEL @ PIYUSH GOYAL (IN CUSTODY) Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 520/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1346/2017 JAIBIR SINGH SEHRAWAT @ JAIBIR SHERAWAT (iv) + CRL.A. 499/2016 MUKESH GUPTA Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Through: Mr. Ganesh Khanna & Dr. Sushil Gupta, Advocates (v) + CRL.A. 495/2016 & Crl.M.(B) 257/2017 UMESH PARASHAR Crl.A.526/2016 Crl.A.523/2016 Crl.A.520/2016 Crl.A.499/2016 Crl.A.495/2016 Crl.A.480/2016 Page 1 of 29 1. Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate (vi) CRL.A. 480/2016 & Crl.M.A. 15869/2016 VIRENDER PAL Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Versus Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate .... Appellant...
M/S S. S. Con- Build Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Total Property Maintenance Llp & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 300/2018 & IA No.9252/2018 M/S S. S. CON- BUILD PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :1. t April, 2019 Through: Mr.Jayant K. Mehta & Mr.Saurabh D. Karan Singh, Advs. M/S TOTAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE LLP & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Sharma, Mr.Kirish Gandhi & Mr.Ninad Dogra, Advs. for R-1. & Mr.Ashish Mr.Kishore Kumaar, Advs. for R-3 Dholakia CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 19.02.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Management and Lease Deed dated 14.09.2015 executed between the parties.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner confines his challenge to a very limited aspect. He submits that the Arbi...
Anoop Sharma & Anr vs.pushpa Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M)16/2019 Judgment reserved on :04. 02.2019 ANOOP SHARMA & ANR Date of decision :01. 04.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocate versus PUSHPA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners vide the present petition assail the impugned order dated 21.04.2018 of the learned First Appellate Court of the ADJ- 04, New Delhi in RCA DJ No.56/17, vide which an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC filed by the appellants seeking to lead additional evidence, was declined, observing to the effect that the appellants through their written statement had stated that the plaintiff i.e. respondent to the appeal had gifted the front portion of the suit property measuring about 100 square meters to the defendant no.1 i.e. the appellant no.1 and that the plaintiff i.e. the respondent had executed CM(M)16/2019 Page 1 of 6 a gift d...
Jaibir Singh Sehrawat @ Jaibir Sherawat vs.central Bureau of Investiga ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Pronounced on: April 01, 2019 (i) + CRL.A. 526/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1347/2017 SURESH KUMAR LAKRA Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Tiwari & Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 523/2016 PIYUSH GOEL @ PIYUSH GOYAL (IN CUSTODY) Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 520/2016 & Crl.M.A. 1346/2017 JAIBIR SINGH SEHRAWAT @ JAIBIR SHERAWAT (iv) + CRL.A. 499/2016 MUKESH GUPTA Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Through: Mr. Ganesh Khanna & Dr. Sushil Gupta, Advocates (v) + CRL.A. 495/2016 & Crl.M.(B) 257/2017 UMESH PARASHAR Crl.A.526/2016 Crl.A.523/2016 Crl.A.520/2016 Crl.A.499/2016 Crl.A.495/2016 Crl.A.480/2016 Page 1 of 29 1. Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate (vi) CRL.A. 480/2016 & Crl.M.A. 15869/2016 VIRENDER PAL Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Senior Versus Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate .... Appellant...
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.punam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 04.2019 % MAC.APP. 414/2019 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.S.P. Jain, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Abhijeet, Advocates. versus PUNAM & ORS for Through Mr.Nitesh Standing Ms.Avnish counsel for the DTC/ respondent no.7. Kumar Ahlawat, ........ RESPONDENTS Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 14463/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. MAC. APPL. 414/2019 and CM APPL. 14464/2019 (for stay) 1. By the instant appeal, the appellant-the insurer, assails the judgment- the Award dated 14.12.2018 passed by the MACT (Pilot Court), MAC.APP. 414/2019 Page 1 of 4 Karkardooma, Delhi, where-under, an Award in the sum of Rs.34,68,572/- has come to be passed in favour of the claimants-the respondent nos. 1 to 6, who are the widow, children and the parents of the deceased Ajay Chauhan, in short 'the deceased', who died as a res...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›