Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neelam Kumari & Ors vs.sidharth Jain & Anr (Future General India Insur ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~12 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 424/2018 & CM APPL.17799/2018 Date of Decision:16. 04.2019 NEELAM KUMARI & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. R.N. Sharma and Mr. Trivedi Prafulla, Advs. versus SIDHARTH JAIN & ANR (FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vikas Lakra, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant appeal, the appellants-claimants assail the quantum of 1. compensation that has come to be awarded to them by MACT, Shahdara, on account of death of Mr. Sushil Kumar Malhotra in short the deceased, on account of fatal injuries sustained by him in the motor accident involving car bearing registration No.DL8 AW7751 whose insurer is the contesting respondent No.2-Future General India Insurance Company Ltd. In view of the fact that the question agitated in the appeal is restricted to quantum of compensation only, the advertence to the other factual aspects to maintain the cla...
Vinod Kumar Asthana vs.joint Secretary (Psp) and Chief Passport Office ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3900/2019 & 17686-87/2019 VINOD KUMAR ASTHANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Nikhil Majithia, Mr Abhir Datt and Ms Mahima Wahi, Advocates. versus JOINT SECRETARY (PSP) AND CHIEF PASSPORT OFFICER AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Ms Aakanksha Kaul, Mr Aakash Varma and Mr Deepak Goyal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1604.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 01.04.2019 passed by respondent no.1 [the Joint Secretary (PSP) & Chief Passport Officer (Central Government)]. in exercise of powers under Section 11 of the Passports Act, 1967. The petitioner also impugns the order dated 02.11.2018 passed by respondent no.2 (Regional Passport Officer) impounding the petitioners passport under Section 10(3)(e) of the Passports Act, 1967.2. The said action has been taken against the petitioner consequent W.P. (C) 3900...
Rajat Vashishtha vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 16, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2008/2019 RAJAT VASHISHTHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Maurya, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sonu. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.199/2018, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC, registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi, is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding (Annexure P-2) and affidavit of 1st April, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sonu on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 2008/2019 Page 1 of 3 betwe...
Pranshu Shakti Tiwary Through Mother smt.kanchan Tiwary vs.central Boa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16th April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1976/2018 and CM No.8123/2018 PRANSHU SHAKTI TIWARY THROUGH MOTHER SMT.KANCHAN TIWARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Sr.SC-CBSE with Mr. Aman Rewaria, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Bansal and Mr. Mohd. Kaisar Ansari, Advs. for R-2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR The petitioner Pranshu Shakti Tiawri was admitted to the 12th JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 1. Class, in the Kendriya Vidyalaya, Andrews Ganj, in 2017.2. The petitioner, it is submitted, suffered from a medical condition resulting in low immunity, as a result of which he frequently fell ill during the academic session 2017-2018. The writ petition annexes the various prescriptions/certificates issued by the doctors at the National Security Guard Composite Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the NSG Hospital), prescribing medicati...
Sujata Kohli vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:16. .04.2019 Judgment Reserved on:25. 01.2019 FAO5202016 SUJATA KOHLI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Goel and Mr. Rizwan Aftab, Advocates. Versus THE STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Duggal & Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocates with R-2 in person + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. This is an appeal under section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 against the Judgment dated 30.07.2016 passed by the court of Ld. Additional District Judge-06, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi (ADJ) in Probate Case no.(new no.42342/16) dismissing the petition of the appellant/petitioner for grant of Letters of Administration in respect of Will dated 21.03.2002.2. The appellant filed a petition for grant of Letters of Administration in respect of Will executed by her father late Sh. Hari Mohan Bhandari dated 21.03.2002. It was registered with the FAO5202016 Page 1 of 10 concerned Sub Registra...
P J vs.p J
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. h April, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia & Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocates alongwith appellant-in-person. P J * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 114/2019 CORAM: P J versus Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate alongwith respondent-in-person. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CAV Pet. 401/2019 1. Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent-father.2. The caveat petition stands disposed of. CM APPL179302019 (exemption) 3. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.4. Application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 114/2019 & CM APPL179292019 (stay) 5. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 26.03.2019 passed on an application filed by the respondent-father under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act seeking interim custody of the minor child aged about 6 years. By virtue of the said order, the Fami...
Master Dixit Analagi and Anr vs.employees State Insurance Coroporation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MASTER DIXIT ANALAGI AND ANR Through Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners Appl.Side-10 $~ * + W.P.(C) 11866/2016 versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE COROPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Amicus Curiae with Ms. Sonali Malik, Advocate. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Siddharth Singh and Mr. Ruchir R. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yakesh Anand with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Advocates and Dr. Naresh Arora, AD (D) and Mr. Dhruv Prasad UDC for ESIC. Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel (Civil), Ms. Niddhi Raman, Ms. Anam Ahmad with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for AIIMS. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Kotla Harshvardhan and Ms. Mansi Sood, Advocate for Sanofi Genzyme. W.P.(C) 11866/2016 Page 1 of 4 Date of Decision:16. h April, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present writ petition has been filed by Master Dixit Analagi. As the petitioner-patient is ...
Rohit Sharma @ Rohit & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 16, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2051/2019 & Crl.M.A. 8144/2019 ROHIT SHARMA @ ROHIT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dhananjay Kapoor Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Praveen Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.176/2018, under Sections 354/354B/379/356/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mutual Agreement (Annexure-B) of 19th April, 2018 and affidavit of 27th December, 2018 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in qu...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.sh. Nitin and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3940/2019 Date of Decision:16.04.2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahender Kr. Bhardwaj with Mr. K.C. Dubey and Ms. Vinita Kumari Ashutosh, Advs. versus SH. NITIN AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. $~22. * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.17894/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CAV No.403/2019 Counsel for the caveator has appeared. The caveat is, accordingly, discharged. W.P.(C) 3940/2019 & C.M. No.17893/2019, C.M. No.17892/2019 1. The petitioner Union of India has preferred the present writ petition W.P.(C.) No.3940/2019 Page 1 of 5 along with the aforesaid applications to assail the order dated 20.11.2017 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A No.4037/2017 along with an application (C.M. No.17893/2019) ...
In the Matter of Cgu Project Services Private Limited Vs...........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 04.2019 $~CP-38 * % + CO.PET. 10/2019 IN THE MATTER OF CGU PROJECT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through Ms. RuchiSindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking dissolution of the Company CGU PROJECT SERVICE PVT. LTD (in members voluntary liquidation) (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on 30.05.2000 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana, New Delhi (ROC) having name HT-CGU Project Services Private Limited having Corporate Identity Number U74140DL2000PTC105972 with the authorized share capital of the said company is Rs.35,00,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Crores only) divided into 3,50,00,000 (Three Cro...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »