Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Essar Power m.p. Ltd. & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. 11.2018 Pronounced on:15. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 4555/2017, CM Appl. Nos. 39665-66/2017 & 21597/2018 ESSAR POWER M.P. LTD. & ANR versus ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 4556/2017, CM Appl. No.18764/2018 & 48019- ........ RESPONDENTS 20/2018 GMR CHHATTISGARH ENERGY LTD & ANR versus ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 4557/2017, CM Appl. No.18770/2018 GMR CHHATTISGARH ENERGY LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus for Present:-"Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Niyati Kohli, Ms. Mishika Bajyapayee and Mr. Akshay Bajpai, Advocates in W.P.(C) 4555/2017. Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Samar Kachwaha, Mr. Chanan Parwani and Mr. Ram Chandramadan, Advocates for... Petitioners in W.P. (C) 4556/2017. the... Petitioners W.P.(C) 4555, 455...
Rehamtullah vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 3879/2019 REHAMTULLAH ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Pratima K.Gupta with Mr.Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv for Mr.Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr.Harvesh Panwas, Asst.Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) C.M.No.17592/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M.No.17590/2019 The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to place on record additional facts and documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 3879/2019 & C.M.No.17591/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 13.02.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in O.A.No.4647/2015. The Tribunal has rejected the said original application preferred ...
Dharambir Singh @ Bobby vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h April, 2019 + CRL.A. 665/2002 and Crl. M (Bail) 433/2019 DHARAMBIR SINGH @ BOBBY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Bhardwaj and Mr. Satish Chandra, Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP with SI Pradeep, PS Vasant Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant was arrested in case arising out of first information report (FIR) no.322/2000 of police station Vasant Vihar on 10.10.2000 and on the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) was sent up for trial, the case (no.27/2001) having been committed to the court of sessions wherein charges were framed against him for offences under Sections 394 and 397 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959. On the conclusion of the trial, by judgment dated 15.07.2002, he was held guilty and convicted by the Additi...
Kanak Jain and Ors vs.chakresh Kumar Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h April 2019 CS(OS) No.1599/2008 & CC No.25/2009. KANAK JAIN AND ORS. .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. Versus CHAKRESH KUMAR JAIN ...Defendant Through: Mr. O.P. Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The four plaintiffs, namely (i) Kanak Jain; (ii) Abhay Kumar Jain; (iii) Rekha Jain; and, (iv) Ektaa Jain, being the widow, son and two daughters of late Shri Suresh Chand Jain, have instituted this suit for partition and rendition of accounts with respect to Property No.1734-A and 1734, Dariba Kalan, Delhi 110 006, against Chakresh Kumar Jain, being the younger brother of said Suresh Chand Jain.2. The suit was entertained and summons thereof ordered to be issued and vide ex parte ad interim order dated 12th August, 2018 parties directed to maintain status quo regarding the aforesaid properties. The defendant, besides filing his written statement has also filed a Counter Claim seek...
The Braithwaite Burn and Jessop Construction Company Limited (Bbj) vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 28, 2019 Pronounced on: April 15, 2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 127/2019 THE BRAITHWAITE BURN AND JESSOP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED (BBJ) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Sayaree Basu Mallik and Mr. Atanu Ray Chaudhary, Advocates. versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD (RVNL) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocate JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as the Act) impugns the Arbitral Award dated 11th October 2018 (hereafter the impugned award), passed by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three Arbitrators (hereinafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. By the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has adjudicated the disputes that had arisen between the parties in respect of the contract agreement dated 4th June 2010 for fabrication, assembly and launching of 16 x 45.7m triangulated open web welded steel through girder con...
Dinesh Tanwar & Anr. Vs.kunwar Singh Tanwar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19. h February, 2019 Date of decision :15th April, 2019 DINESH TANWAR & ANR. RFA5442016 & CM APPL. 7381/2017 ..... Appellants Sudan Bhayana, Through: Mr. Madhu Advocate. Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Mahender Singh & Mr. Aabhas Dahiya, Advocates (M-9810808725) versus KUNWAR SINGH TANWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Achal Gupta & Ms. Annie Rais, Advocates for R-1 (M-8860751919) Inspector Ram Kishan Pardeep. and SI AND RFA6952016 & CM APPLS. 20788/2017, 20809/2017, 23088/2017 PRATIBHA Through: Mr. Madhu ..... Appellant Sudan Bhayana, Advocate. Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Mahender Singh & Mr. Aabhas Dahiya, Advocates. versus KANWAR SINGH TANWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Achal Gupta & Ms. Annie Rais, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff Shri Kanwar Singh Tanwar (hereinafter, Plaintiff) RFA5442016 & 695/2016 Page 1 of 46 filed the present suit for specific per...
M/S Century Pulp & Paper vs.shiv Sales Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~OS-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:15. 04.2019 + CS(COMM) 737/2017 M/S CENTURY PULP & PAPER Through Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus SHIV SALES CORPORATION Through Mr.P.K.Sharma and Mr.Ayush, Advs. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.3469/2019 1. This application is filed by the plaintiff under Order XIIIA of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as amended by the 2018 Act r/w section 151 CPC. The present suit is filed for recovery of Rs. 2,20,00,000/-. The case of the plaintiff is that he is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of writing, printing and tissue paper. The defendant was appointed as a distributor/dealer for writing and tissue paper for the Delhi region in terms of distribution/dealership agreement. It is pleaded that on 4.9.2015 a Settlement was arrived at between the parties on account of which the defendant had acknowledged that they will pay to the plaintiff a sum of...
Prashant Deep vs.high Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1960/2019 Date of Decision:15. 04.2019 PRASHANT DEEP ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI Through Ms.Anu Bagai, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the order dated 11.02.2019 passed by the respondent/High Court of Delhi, whereby the petitioners services were terminated. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondent to reinstate him in service on the post of Junior Judicial Assistant.2. The facts emerging from the record that are necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are as follows. The respondent, on 12.06.2017, issued an advertisement inviting applications for filling up 124 vacancies to the post of Junior Judicial Assistant/Restorer and for preparing a panel for future vacancies. P...
Gmr Chhattisgarh Energy Ltd. & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. 11.2018 Pronounced on:15. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 4555/2017, CM Appl. Nos. 39665-66/2017 & 21597/2018 ESSAR POWER M.P. LTD. & ANR versus ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 4556/2017, CM Appl. No.18764/2018 & 48019- ........ RESPONDENTS 20/2018 GMR CHHATTISGARH ENERGY LTD & ANR versus ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 4557/2017, CM Appl. No.18770/2018 GMR CHHATTISGARH ENERGY LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus for Present:-"Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Niyati Kohli, Ms. Mishika Bajyapayee and Mr. Akshay Bajpai, Advocates in W.P.(C) 4555/2017. Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Samar Kachwaha, Mr. Chanan Parwani and Mr. Ram Chandramadan, Advocates for... Petitioners in W.P. (C) 4556/2017. the... Petitioners W.P.(C) 4555, 455...
Sunborne Energy Rajasthan Solar Pvt. Ltd vs.ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 222/2016 & IA235922015 Reserved on:28. 11.2018 Date of Decision :15. 04.2019 SUNBORNE ENERGY RAJASTHAN SOLAR PVT. LTD Through: Mr.Tarun Johri, Mr.Ankur Gupta and Mr.Ankit Saini, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Bharat Sangal and Ms.Babita Kushwaha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The petitioner by way of this present petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenges the majority Arbitral Award dated 27.10.2015 (hereinafter referred to as Impugned Award) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal dismissing the claims filed by the petitioner, while holding the respondent as entitled to encash the Bank Guarantee for Rs.2,62,27,000.00 furnished by the petitioner, and also awarding costs of proceedings in favour of the respondent.2. The disputes in the case are in relation to the Power Purchase Ag...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »