Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 23 2019

Anju Azad & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~12 * + % W.P.(C) 6662/2016 and C.M. No.10284/2018 Date of Decision:23. 04.2019 ANJU AZAD & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Mr. Hem Kumar, Mr. Pritish Sabharwal & Ms.Bushra Waseem, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, Mr. Arpit Gupta and Md. Ali, Advocates for respondent Nos. 3 to 11. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 17.05.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.2481/2014. The Tribunal had rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioners, wherein they had assailed the provisional seniority list dated 31.01.2014 as also the final seniority list dated 11.07.2014. In the said provisional seniority list of Senior W.P.(C.) No.6662/20...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2019

Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.ayub Ali & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2019

$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d April, 2019 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI O.M.P. 287/2010 & I.A. 3912/2019, 3913/2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Angad Mehta, Advocate (M. No.9560956484) along with A.O. of GNCTD. AYUB ALI & ORS. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Advocate for R-1 along with Mr. Sarfaraz son of R-1 (M-9717940440) Mr. Prakash Rawat, Advocate (M. No.9446515711) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The matter was listed for hearing of the restoration application and also on merits as was directed on 29th March, 2019. Since the execution proceedings were pending and the... Petitioner has already submitted a cheque in favour of the executing Court, which is yet to be encashed, the matter was heard on merits itself.2. The dismissal of the petition on 18th January, 2017 was due to non prosecution. The petition is accordingly restored and heard on merits.3. The present petition has been filed under S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2019

M vs.m S

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2019

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d of April, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 76/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.16759/2017 M ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anshul Duggal, Mr. Altamish Siddiki and Mr. Prateek Yadav, Advocates alongwith appellant in person. CORAM: M S Versus Through: Mr. Rajesh Raina, Advocate alongwith respondent in person. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 22.02.2017 passed by the Family Court in a petition filed by the respondent/husband seeking dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) by which a decree of divorce has been granted.2. The necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that the marriage between the appellant/wife and the respondent/husband was solemnized on 23.04.2000 as per Hind...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Jagjivan Ram @ Jage Ram vs.airport Authority of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ * + W.P.(C) 5356/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 04.2019 Pronounced on:22. 04.2019 JAGJIVAN RAM @ JAGE RAM ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Asish Nischal with Mr. Arun versus Nischal, Advs. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Dig Vijay Rai with Mr. Kustubh Singh Advs. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside order dated 24.07.2012 whereby the request of the petitioner for permitting to join duties has been rejected. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondent to review its order dated 18.04.2001 whereby the services of the petitioner was terminated in the light of acquittal of the petitioner by the criminal court in case of FIR bearing No.5/2001, under sectionsof the IPC.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 26.02.1998, the respondent- authority issued a letter regularizing the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 06.12....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Rahul vs.state Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

* % + RAHUL IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : April 01, 2019 Judgment Delivered on : April 22, 2019 CRL.A. 547/2017 Represented by: Mr.Sumant De ..... Appellant and Mr.Vivek Agarwal , Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Pradeep Kumar, PS Model Town CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Rahul challenges the impugned judgment dated 1st March, 2017 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II IPC in FIR No.274/2016 registered at PS Model Town and the order on sentence dated 6th March, 2017 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that as per the testimony of the various eye-witnesses, the deceased Arjun gave a kick blow to the appellant first which resulted in a quarrel therefore no mens rea has been established on part of the app...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Manish Jain & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2019 Decided on: April 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 5765/2018 SH. YASHPAL CHAUDHRANI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Veena Ralli, Adv. / Organising Secretary, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. + CRL.M.C. 5768/2018 AKHIL ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Crl.MC576518, 5768/18, 5785/18, 58& 59Page 1 of 65 Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5785/2018 RAJIV ARORA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

M/S Abhilasha Enterprises vs.new Delhi Municipal Council

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d April, 2019 + LPA5002018 M/S ABHILASHA ENTERPRISES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S. K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Mr. Prashant Kumar and Mr. Sushil Dwivedi, Advs. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Council with Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.(ORAL) The present appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent has been filed by the appellant/ M/s Abhilasha Enterprises, which is a sole proprietorship concern, impugning judgment dated 17.07.2018 rendered by the single Judge in Writ Petition (Civil) No.2312/2017, whereby the single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant, denying the appellants claim for refund of earnest money deposit made with the respondent. LPA5002018 page 1 of 6 2. Notice was issued in the appeal vide order dated ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Sunil Kumar Saxena vs.export Inspection Council & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 02.2019 Pronounced on:22. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 8335/2017 SUNIL KUMAR SAXENA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Parveen Kumar, Adv. versus EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.L.R. Khatana, Adv. for R-1 to 4. Mr.Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner has made following prayers: (I) Quash the illegal, arbitrary & shockingly prejudice punishment order dated 02.11.2015 (Annexure P-1) of removal of the petitioner from the service. (II) Quash the illegal, arbitrary & shockingly prejudice punishment order dated 14.02.2017 dismissing the appeal and imposing punishment of Compulsory Retirement (Annexure P-2). (III) Issue order for back wages with all consequential benefits W.P.(C) 8335/2017 Page 1 of 13 entitled being on regular duty with 12% interest w.e.f. 02.11.2015. (IV) Declare the malafide suspension w.e.f. 29.10.2012 and th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Ramesh kr.chauhan vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Judgment Delivered on: April 22, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2674/2014 TARA CHAND ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, Advocate for complainant BAIL APPLN. 2680/2014 ANUJ KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, Advocate for complainant BAIL APPLN. 123/2015 MADANLAL BABULAL CHOWATIA & ORS ........ Petitioners BAIL APPLN. 2674/2014 & conn.matters Page 1 of 7 + + Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr.Neeraj...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Akhil Arora & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.