Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Living Media India Limited & Anr. Vs.vijayan Madhavan Praveen & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1107/2018 LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Surinder Kaul, Advocates versus VIJAYAN MADHAVAN PRAVEEN & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: None. Date of Decision:16. h April, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement and passing off of trade mark andcopyright and rendition of accounts against the defendants. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"53. Thus in these circumstances and in the larger interest of justice it is most humbly prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to grant: (a) a decree of permanent the Defendants, their representatives, heirs, promoters, shareholders, directors, servants, employees, successors, assignees, licensees etc or any other person claiming the through or under injunction against its agents, CS (COMM) 1107/2018 Page 1 of 7 (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) and and...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.rakesh Kumar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~28. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16.04.2019 W.P.(C) 3960/2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh with Mr Preet Singh, Advs. versus RAKESH KUMAR AND ANR Through: ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.17955/2019 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 3960/2019 & C.M. No.17954/2019 2. The petitioner Union of India assails the order dated 16.11.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.2553/2018. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has disposed of the respondents original application by directing the petitioner herein to continue the respondent applicants if there is work, in the W.P.(C.) No.3960/2019 Page 1 of 5 same capacity and on the same terms, in preference to their juniors, or freshers, or outsourced employees.3...
M/S National Industrial Corporation (P) Ltd vs.the Excise Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2402/2019 M/S NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (P) LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Samrat Nigam, Md.Qamar Ali & Mr.M.U.Siddiqui, Advocates versus THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ramesh Singh, Std.Counsel with Mr.Dhananjaya Mishra, Ms.Nikita Goyal & Mr.Chirayu Jain, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % CM Appl. 18056/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 2402/2019 & CM Appl. 17968/2019 (stay) 1.2. Issue notice. Mr.Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel accepts notice. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order rejecting its application for waiver/exemption from the requirement of pre-deposit, made in terms of Section 74(2) of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009.3. The facts are that the petitioner has a warehouse and is holder of the license ...
Balbir Singh Chauhan vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA2122018 & CM APPL. No.49510/2018 Reserved on:01. t April, 2019 Date of decision:16. h April, 2019 BALBIR SINGH CHAUHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nikhil Singla, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for R1. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Lalit Gupta and Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advs. for R2 to R4. CORAM: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.1. The appellant was the petitioner in W.P. (C) No.2194/2018 in which he had challenged order dated 10.03.2017 made by North Delhi Municipal Corporation (the Corporation) revalidating sanctioned building plan dated 02.03.1971 issued in favour of respondent No.4/East India Hotels Limited (EIH).2. As per the appellants own averments, he is a resident of Oberoi Apartments situate at 2 Sham Nath Marg, Alipur Road, Civil Lin...
Kumari Priya and Anr vs.employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
Appl.Side-5 $~ * + W.P.(C) 4444/2016 versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI KUMARI PRIYA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Amicus Curiae with Ms. Sonali Malik, Advocate. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Siddharth Singh, Mr. Ruchir R. Rai, Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal with Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yakesh Anand with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Advocates and Dr. Naresh Arora, AD (D) and Mr. Dhruv Prasad UDC for ESIC. Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel (Civil) with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Anand Verma and Mr. Shwetank Singh and Mr. Tanveer Oberoi Advocates for AIIMS. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Kotla Harshvardhan and Ms. Mansi Sood, Advocate for Sanofi Genzyme. W.P.(C) 4444/2016 Page 1 of 4 Date of Decision:16. h April, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present writ petition has been filed by Kumari Priya. As...
Bata India Limited vs.chawla Boot House & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d April, 2019 Date of decision:16th April, 2019 + CS (COMM) 110/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Anmol Chadha and Ms. Rudrarti Kaur, Advocates. versus CHAWLA BOOT HOUSE & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Mr. Somnath, Advocates (M:88609. 7189). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 3051/2019 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) and I.A. 3686/2019 (u/Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. The present order disposes of two applications being under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC and under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.2. The Plaintiff Bata India Limited (hereinafter Plaintiff) has filed the present suit seeking an injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, unfair competition, damages, etc. The facts as essential for the present order are narrated below. Plaintiffs case 3. The Plaintiff is a well-known manufacturer and seller of foo...
Madhu Kumari & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 16, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2035/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8071/2019 MADHU KUMARI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Kaushal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rajiv Kumar. Mr. K.S. Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 2061/2019 & CRL.M.A. 8182/2019 NAVEEN & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Kaushal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE G.N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rajiv Kumar. Mr. K.S. Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 306/2018 under Sections 3of IPC and FIR No.307/2018 under Sections 323/354(B)/506/5of IPC both registered at Police Station Crl.M.C. 2035/2019 & Crl.M.C. 2061/2019 Page 1 of 3 Pul Pehladpur, De...
M/S. McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.pr. Commissioner of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Review Pet. 360/2018 in ITA4612017 M/s. MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD. Date of Order :16. 04.2019 ..... Appellant PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 Versus ..... Respondent Review Pet. 359/2018 in ITA5262017 M/s. MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD. + ..... Appellant PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 Versus ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Divesh Chawla, Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani and Mr. Sheel Vardhan, Advs. for the appellant. Counsel for the respondent: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Sachin Yadav, Advs. for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The appellant preferred this review petition urging that the final judgment rendered under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act contains errors apparent on the face of the record.2. The question of law framed by this Court was with respect ...
Ramesh Chand vs.shyama Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:26. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:16. h April, 2019 + RC.REV. 309/2018, CM Appl. No.27327/2018 RAMESH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Aneja, Ms.Chandrika Gupta, Advocates. versus SHYAMA ARORA Through Mr.Gaurav Advocate. ..... Respondent Singh, Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition challenges the impugned order dated 07.04.2018 whereby the eviction petition filed by the petitioner herein was dismissed after evidence. Before coming to the issues raised it would be appropriate to state few facts.2. The petitioner herein filed an eviction petition in respect of a shop at No.97, Block-D, Gali No.6, Shashi Garden, Patparganj, Delhi. The said premises is required by the petitioner for his daughter in law to start a garment business.3. Admittedly the petitioner has two sons and three daughters; all are since married. The petitioner is a senior citizen of 65 years of age and has a meag...
M/S Khosla Transport Company vs.pramod Singh & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2019
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 04.2019 % MAC.APP. 695/2014 M/S KHOSLA TRANSPORT COMPANY ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ashok Popli, Advocate. versus PRAMOD SINGH & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant appeal, 1. the appellant-the owner of truck bearing no.DL1LG-B-4770, in short the offending vehicle, assails the impugned judgment/Award dated 11.10.2013 passed by MACT (North-East), where- under, the right to recover the Award amount from the appellant has been granted to the insurer-the respondent no.3. In view of the restricted challenge to the impugned Award, the advertence to the other factual aspects to maintain the claim petition before the Tribunal, is not called for. MAC.APP. 695/2014 Page 1 of 6 The Tribunal granted recovery right 2. to the insurer with the observations and the conclusions drawn in the impugned judgment/Award, as follows: Lia...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »