Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Police, Delhi and Ors. Vs.sukram Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 3883/2019 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, S.C. with Mr.Nitesh Singh, Adv. versus Through Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Adv. ..... Respondent SUKRAM PAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CAV No.393/2019 Learned counsel for the caveator/respondent enters appearance. The caveat stands discharged. W.P.(C) 3883/2019 & C.M.No.17603/2019 1. The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 28.09.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in O.A. No.2360 of 2015 filed by the respondent. Vide the impugned order, the Tribunal has allowed the respondents aforesaid OA and has set aside the penalty imposed on him.2. On 08.09.2005, while posted as a Constable at P.S. Roop Nagar, the respondent along with one Head C...
Vinod Seth(deceased) Thr Kunal Seth and Anr. Vs.sudershan Kumar Bhayan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h April, 2019 + O.M.P. 1125/2014 VINOD SETH(DECEASED) THR KUNAL SETH AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. P.K. Rawal, Mr. Tarun Agarwal versus & Mr. Rishabh Sharma, Advocates (M-9810008623) SUDERSHAN KUMAR BHAYANA & ANR. Through Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Baliyan, ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Advocate (M-9818340105) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition arises out of award dated 21st October, 2013 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator. The disputes arose out of agreement dated 9th April, 2010 by which the... Petitioner Sh. Vinod Seth agreed to construct on the property of Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Bayana, i.e, property bearing No.40, Block F-1U, Pitampura, Delhi. As per the agreement, the builder had to construct 1/3rd parking plus 2/3rd basement with water proofing work, upper ground floor, first floor, second floor and third floor with all the fittings and furniture as per A-class constructi...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-9 vs.om Prakash Jakhotia & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23.01.19 Pronounced on:15. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 11859/2016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, SSC with Mr. Piyush Goyal, Advocate. versus OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prashant Shukla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The Income Tax Department (hereinafter referred to as the Revenue) is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) dated 26.11.2014 which accepted the application made by the respondent assessees (collectively referred to as the Jakhotias) and issuing consequential directions.2. The search was conducted in the premises of the assessee and related companies together with that of the Dalmia Group on 20.01.2012. Cash to the tune of `35 lakhs and an incriminating register containing details of cash loans was also recovered and seized. The fir...
Pratibha vs.kanwar Singh Tanwar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19. h February, 2019 Date of decision :15th April, 2019 DINESH TANWAR & ANR. RFA5442016 & CM APPL. 7381/2017 ..... Appellants Sudan Bhayana, Through: Mr. Madhu Advocate. Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Mahender Singh & Mr. Aabhas Dahiya, Advocates (M-9810808725) versus KUNWAR SINGH TANWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Achal Gupta & Ms. Annie Rais, Advocates for R-1 (M-8860751919) Inspector Ram Kishan Pardeep. and SI AND RFA6952016 & CM APPLS. 20788/2017, 20809/2017, 23088/2017 PRATIBHA Through: Mr. Madhu ..... Appellant Sudan Bhayana, Advocate. Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Mahender Singh & Mr. Aabhas Dahiya, Advocates. versus KANWAR SINGH TANWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Achal Gupta & Ms. Annie Rais, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff Shri Kanwar Singh Tanwar (hereinafter, Plaintiff) RFA5442016 & 695/2016 Page 1 of 46 filed the present suit for specific per...
Mayur Seeds Corporation and Agritech vs.national Seeds Corporation Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:15. 04.2019 FAO (OS)(COMM.) NO.101/2018 MAYUR SEEDS CORPORATION & AGRITECH Through: Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate. ..... APPELLANT versus NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LIMITED. Through: Mr. Yashvardhan, Ms. Smita ..... RESPONDENT Kant & Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocates for NSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. This appeal is directed against a judgement dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act). That petition impugned an arbitral award dated 05.08.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) of the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of the sole arbitrator.2. The facts are that a notice inviting tender (NIT) was issued by the National Seeds Corporation (NSC) on 04.06.2011, calling upon eligible bidders to furnish bids for supply of certified Soyabean seeds FAO (OS)(COMM.) NO.101/2018 Page 1 of 12 for th...
Pradeep Kumar vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Etc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h April, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 246/2019 & CRL.M.As.4756-57/2019 PRADEEP KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Drall and Ms. Rubi versus Nigam, Advs. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ETC ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) for setting aside the impugned order dated 14.5.2018 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board- II (JJB- II) and impugned judgment dated 23.1.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-04, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (Appellate Court) in Crl. Appeal No.249/2018.2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that, on 01.05.2017 an FIR No.153/2017 was registered at Police Station: Chhawala, South West Delhi under Sections 363, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as a co...
Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Limited vs.jk Lakshmi Cement Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 256/2017 NUVOCO VISTAS CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nancy Roy and Mr. Dhruv Nayyar, Advocates. versus JK LAKSHMI CEMENT LIMITED & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tanvi Misra and Mr. Sanchith Shivakumar, Advocates. Reserved on:25. h March, 2019 Date of Decision:15th April, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. No.4261/2017, 5564/2017 1. While I.A. No.4261/2017 has been filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, I.A. 5564/2017 has been filed by the defendants under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacation of the ex parte ad interim order dated 11th April, 2017 passed by the learned Predecessor of this Court. CS(COMM) 256/2017 Page 1 of 38 2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for injunction and damages for infringement of trademark, passing off, and unfair trade compet...
The Orienal Insurance Co Ltd vs.shakuntla and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :15. 04.2019 MAC.APP. 1078/2016 THE ORIENAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SHAKUNTLA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the instant appeal, the appellant-the insurer assails the judgment- award dated 15.10.2016 passed by MACT, Shahdara, to the limited extent of quantum of compensation, and, the rate of interest applied, thereon. In view of the restricted challenge to the impugned judgment-award, the advertence to the factual aspects, on which the claim petition was maintained before the Tribunal, is not called for. After the issuance of the notice of the instant appeal, the claimants- respondent Nos. 1 to 5 have filed the cross-objections under Order 41 R. 22 accompanied with an application being CM No.17647/2018 seeking condonation of delay in filing such cross-objections. By the cr...
Ravinder Sharma @ John vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 15, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2018/2019 & CRL.M.A. 7989/2019 RAVINDER SHARMA @ JOHN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Raham Singh Mr. Ashish Arya, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.39/2018, under Sectionsof IPC, registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 11th April, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that offence under Section 326 of IPC has been added and attention of this court has been drawn to the MLC of respondent No.2/Injured. Respondent No.2 prese...
Hemant Kumar Sahu vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10651/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. HEMANT KUMAR SAHU UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Vivek K. Singh, DC Law with SI Deepak Kumar, CRPF. % CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1504.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner who is presently holding the rank of 2-I/C in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) is aggrieved by his non-promotion to the post of Commandant along with his juniors whose cases were considered by the Departmental Promotional Committee (DPC) at its meeting held on 19th May 2017.2. The facts in brief are set out in the counter-affidavit filed by the... RESPONDENTS themselves. It is not in dispute that the aforementioned DPC to consider the promotion of the... Petitioner from the post of 2-I/C to W. P (C) 10651 of 2017 Page 1 of 6 Comman...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »