Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 22 2019

State vs.dinesh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:25. h February, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:22. d April, 2019 CRL.A. 258/2012 STATE DINESH Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI ....Appellant P.L. Meena, PS Anand Vihar versus Through: Mr.J.P. Singh, Adv .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J CRL.A. 258/2012 1. The present Appeal is instituted on behalf of the State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 21.03.2011 passed by the Court of ASJ, Rohini Courts, Delhi, FIR No.112/2010, P.S. Aman Vihar, registered under section 302/3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC).2. The brief facts of the case, as distinguished by the learned Trial Court are as under: - 2. Briefly stated, case of the prosecution is to the effect that Kavita was married to accused Dinesh approx...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Tara Chand vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Judgment Delivered on: April 22, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2674/2014 TARA CHAND ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, Advocate for complainant BAIL APPLN. 2680/2014 ANUJ KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, Advocate for complainant BAIL APPLN. 123/2015 MADANLAL BABULAL CHOWATIA & ORS ........ Petitioners BAIL APPLN. 2674/2014 & conn.matters Page 1 of 7 + + Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr.Neeraj...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Tahejul Seikh @ Siraj vs.the State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:14. h February, 2019 Judgment Delivered on:22. d April, 2019 CRL.A. 125/2017 TAHEJUL SEIKH @ SIRAJ Represented by: Mr.P.K.Anand, Advocate ..... Appellant THE STATE versus .Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with ASI Abdul Barkat, Narcotics Cell/Crime Branch + CRL.A. 592/2017 NASEEM STATE Represented by: Mr.Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate versus ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the ..... Respondent State with ASI Abdul Barkat, Narcotics Cell/Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present appeals are directed against the judgment dated 22nd December, 2016 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS whereby the appellants Tahejul Seikh @ Siraj and Naseem were convicted for offence punishable under Section 21(c) of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act'). Vide order on sentence dated 22nd December, 2016, they were senten...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

j.b. Sharma vs.uoi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 03.2019 Pronounced on :22. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 2329/2007 & CM Appl. 46928/2018 J.B. SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in Person. versus UOI & ORS. Through: Mr. Shashwat Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS Sharma, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. The petitioner's challenge in this writ petition is to a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter, "the Tribunal"]. dated 03.01.2007 in O.A. No.285/2006 by which his application was dismissed.2. The petitioner joined the services of the Indian Council of Medical Research [hereinafter, "ICMR"]. on 27.12.1971 as a Senior Stenographer by direct recruitment. He was promoted to the post of Senior Personal Assistant [SPA]. on 18.04.1977 and was upgraded as Private Secretary [PS]. w.e.f. 04.06.1983. By an earlier application to the Tribunal [O.A.No.1134/2005]. the petitioner raised ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

State vs.mohd. Faizan & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:15. h February, 2019 Judgement pronounced on:22. d April, 2019 CRL.LP.404/2018 STATE Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI ..... Appellant Balbir, PS K. Khas. Versus MOHD. FAIZAN & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K. Saxena, Advocate (DHCLSC) for respondent Ashraf. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 13.03.2018 passed by the learned Trial Court in Session Case No.44614/15, whereby all the respondents (accused before the Trial Court) were acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 307/344/365/366/3of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as IPC).2. Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the learned Trial Court, are as under: - (i...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Madanlal Babulal Chowatia & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Sh. Yashpal Chaudhrani & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2019 Decided on: April 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 5765/2018 SH. YASHPAL CHAUDHRANI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Veena Ralli, Adv. / Organising Secretary, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. + CRL.M.C. 5768/2018 AKHIL ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Crl.MC576518, 5768/18, 5785/18, 58& 59Page 1 of 65 Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5785/2018 RAJIV ARORA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Koninlijke Philips n.v. & Anr. Vs.amitkumar Kantilal Jain & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

$~ * + + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 737/2016 & I.A. 7469/2016 KONINLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand with versus AMAZESTORE & ORS. Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola, Ms. Vrinda Gambhir, Advocates ..... Defendants Through: None AND CS(COMM) 1170/2016 & I.A. 2685/2017, 16768/2018 KONINLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand with Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola, Ms. Vrinda Gambhir, Advocates Versus AMITKUMAR KANTILAL JAIN & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: None Reserved on:08. h April, 2019 Date of Decision:22. d April, 2019 CS(COMM) 737/2016 & CS(COMM) 1170/2016 Page 1 of 48 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: JUDGMENT BACKGROUND1 Present suits have been filed seeking decree of damages as well as permanent injunction restraining violation of multiple statutory and common law rights, namely: a. Piracy of registered design number 253140 in CS(COMM) 737 of 2016. The prayer cl...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

M/S Industrial Foams Private Limited vs.m/s Vardhman Precision Profile ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 04.2019 CO.PET. 565/2014 $~CP-20 * % + M/S INDUSTRIAL FOAMS PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner M/S VARDHMAN PRECISION PROFILES & TUBES PVT. LTD. Through Mr.Anand Srivastava, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sunil K. Jain, Mr.Punya Garg and Mr. Abhishek Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) This petition is filed under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the 1. Companies Act seeking winding up of the respondent Company.2. It is the case of the petitioner that orders were placed by the respondent Company on the petitioner on 14.07.2012. Additional orders were placed from August to September 2012. Between 20.08.2012 to 15.09.2012 various tax invoices were raised by the... Petitioner Company against the aforesaid purchase orders, for an amount aggregating to a sum of Rs.1,11,83,132/-. The respondent company on behalf of its joint venture partially liquidated the dues of the aforesaid sum; leavin...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Anuj Kumar Jain vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2019

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.