Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 10.2018 Pronounced on:22. 04.2019 LPA No.359/2017, CM Nos.17922/2017, 20160/2017, 33383- 84/2017, 47167/2017 & 660/2018 BAYER CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Arpita Sawhney and Mr. Arun Kumar Jana, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh and Mr. Shashwat Jain, Advs. for R-1 & 6. Ms. Rajeshwari, Adv. for R-2 & 5. Ms. Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advocates for Interveners. RFA(OS)(COMM) 6/2017, CM Nos.17508/2017 & 32128- 29/2017 BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Nishchal Anand and Mr. Sanchith Shivakumar, Advs. versus ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advs. FAO (OS) (COMM) 169/20...
Mr. Puschpender vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d April, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 884/2019 MR. PUSCHPENDER Represented by: STATE & ANR. versus Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. with Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Adv. with SI Vineet Kumar PS Narela. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The two prayers of the petitioner in the present petition are to grant 2nd and 3rd spell of furlough together so that he can avail the same in one go and quash the punishment as approved on 10th January, 2019 for the alleged incident dated 4th December, 2018.2. As regards availing 2nd and 3rd spell of furlough together are concerned, it is trite that furlough is a reward of good behaviour in the prisons and as three spells of furlough are granted in one conviction year to people who are eligible for the same; the three furloughs are therefore required to be phased out so that the pri...
M/S Versatile Commotrade Private Limited vs.smt Kesar Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 10, 2019 Pronounced on: April 22, 2019 CS(OS) 143/2018 Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advocate M/S VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff SMT KESAR DEVI AND ORS Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate versus ..... Defendants JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present suit is for recovery of Rs. 1,49,06,814/- along with interest at the rate of 14.25% p.a. from 29th September 2013 till the date of actual payment. The matter is at the stage of framing of issues. Brief Facts 2. The Plaintiff and the Defendants entered into an agreement to sell dated 16th April 2013, in respect of agricultural land admeasuring 17 Bigha 11 biswa (out of total 27 Bigha 6 Biswa) consisting in Khasra No.86/91, Khasra No.57(3-12), 58(3-15), 59(5-3), 593 (4-16), Khata Khatoni No.87/92, Khasra No.572 (0-5), situated in the revenue estate Jaffarpur Kalan, New Delhi. (hereinafter referred to as the suit property).3. Under the aforesaid agreemen...
Sanjeev Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:13. h February 2019 Judgment Delivered on:22. d April, 2019 CRL.A. 770/2016 SANJEEV KUMAR Represented by: Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate with Appellant in person ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State CRL.A. 855/2016 & Crl.M.B.No.1618/2017 with SI Alok Bajpai, Special Cell/SR ..... Appellant DINEBARI DBARI @ DANIEL Represented by: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) and Mr. Avinash, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Special Cell/SR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The present appeals are directed against the judgment dated 13th May 2016 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS whereby the appellants Sanjeev Kumar and Dinebari Debari @ Daniel were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 21(c) of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic CRL.A.770/2016 & 855/2016 Page 1...
Ashwani Kumar & Anr vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2019 Decided on: April 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 5765/2018 SH. YASHPAL CHAUDHRANI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Veena Ralli, Adv. / Organising Secretary, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. + CRL.M.C. 5768/2018 AKHIL ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Crl.MC576518, 5768/18, 5785/18, 58& 59Page 1 of 65 Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5785/2018 RAJIV ARORA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: ...
Ranjit Kumar Gupta vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 13258/2018 & CM APPLN. 51575/2018 RANJIT KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Arpit Bhargava, Adv. with Ms.Hina Bhargava & Mr.Varun Talwar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.J.K. Singh, Standing counsel with Mr.Harsh Pandit, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing respondent no.1 to implement guidelines being RBE No.138/2014 dated 10.12.2014 in letter and spirit.2. Further seeks direction to set aside the order dated 07.06.2018 passed by respondent no.2 in violation of mandatory guidelines of respondent no.1. Consequently, directing respondent no.2 to issue call letter in terms of RBE No.138/2014 in second block date and appoint petitioner in terms thereof.3. The facts of the present case are that the petitioner belongs to Other WP (C) 13258/2018 Page 1 of 7 Ba...
Ankur vs.directorate of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 03.2019 Pronounced on:22. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 2850/2018 & CM APPL. 11553/2018 ANKUR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Virendra Rawat, Adv. with Mr.Kamal Kapoor, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. for R-1 &2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the impugned order dated 27.01.2018 and letter no.423/SMVV/2018 dated 03.02.2018. Consequently, seeks direction thereby directing the respondent no.2 to release grant of aid qua the petitioners salary.2. The present petition is second round of litigation. Earlier vide communication dated 14.11.2017 of the respondent no.2, the petitioners appointment as peon for about 9 years was declared to be illegal. Being aggrieved, he had challenged the order dated 14.11.2017 regarding stoppage W.P.(C) 2850/2018 Page 1 of 12 of payment qua peti...
Champatlal Jain vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 27, 2019 Judgment Delivered on: April 22, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2674/2014 TARA CHAND ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, Advocate for complainant BAIL APPLN. 2680/2014 ANUJ KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, Advocate for complainant BAIL APPLN. 123/2015 MADANLAL BABULAL CHOWATIA & ORS ........ Petitioners BAIL APPLN. 2674/2014 & conn.matters Page 1 of 7 + + Represented by: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhatia and Mr.Anurag Sahay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State Mr.Neeraj...
Rajiv Arora & Ors vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 15, 2019 Decided on: April 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 5765/2018 SH. YASHPAL CHAUDHRANI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Veena Ralli, Adv. / Organising Secretary, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. + CRL.M.C. 5768/2018 AKHIL ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans & Ms. Aarti Machanda, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Crl.MC576518, 5768/18, 5785/18, 58& 59Page 1 of 65 Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, Spl. Cell/SR. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Sinha, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 5785/2018 RAJIV ARORA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: ...
Mohinder Singh vs.om Prakash Gahlot & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d April, 2019. CS(OS) 564/2016, IA No.5347/2019 (of D-2(III) for serving interrogatories on D-3&4) & IA No.5348/2019 (of D-2(III) for framing additional issue) MOHINDER SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal & Mr. Amit Rana, Advs. Versus OM PRAKASH GAHLOT & ORS Through: Mr. Dilip Singh, Adv. for D-1. ..... Defendants Mr. Ashok Kumar Gahaloth, Adv. for D-2(III). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit against i) Sh. Om Prakash Gahlot; ii) Sh. Prem Singh Gahlot through legal heirs viz. a) Smt. Rajo, b) Sh. Sunil, c) Sh. Sushil, d) Sh. Satish, and, e) Sh. Sanjay; iii) Sh. Sat Narain, and iv) Sh. Bir Singh, for (I) partition of property bearing Khasra No.2min (1- 9), 12 min (3-7), 1(0-5), 13 min south (3-11), 14 (5-3), 18 (4-4), 19 (4- 4), 19min (0-2 ) total measuring 21-7 Bighas approx. (Excluding 920 sq. yards out of 22-5 Bighas as shown in Red Colour in the site plan)...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »