Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M S vs.s D
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:20. 02.2019 Judgment pronounced on:23. .04.2019 + MAT. APP (F.C.) 213/2017 & CM APPL. 45034/2017 M S S D ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ashok Gurnani, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus Through: Ms.A.Banerji, Advocate (DHCLSC) ..... Respondent along with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The appellant by way of the present appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 19.08.2017 passed by the Family Court in HMA No.5861389/2016 whereby on a petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) filed by the appellant/husband, the Family Court has passed a decree of judicial separation between the parties U/s 10 of the Act, which was an alternate prayer by the appellant. MAT.APP(F.C.) No.213/2017 Page 1 of 25 2. The relevant facts necessary for the present appeal are that the part...
sh.ashok Kumar Yogi vs.the Additional Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~51, 52 & 55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4131/2019 + W.P.(C) 4132/2019 + W.P.(C) 4151/2019 SH. KRISHAN KISHORE AGGARWAL SH. ASHOK KUMAR YOGI SH. KISHORE AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Adv. in W.P.(C) 4131/2019 & 4151/2019. Mr. Amor Nath Tiwari, Adv. in W.P.(C) 4132/2019. versus THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Std. Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % CM APPL.18617/2019 in W.P.(C) 4131/2019 CM APPL.18618/2019 in W.P.(C) 4132/2019 CM APPL.18709/2019 in W.P.(C) 4151/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C) Nos.4131/2019, 4132/2019 & 4151/2019 Page 1 of 7 W.P.(C) 4131/2019, W.P.(C) 4132/2019 & W.P.(C) 4151/2019 1. The narrow ground on which the petitioners question the common...
Mani Devi & Ors. Vs.sunil Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~49 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:23. d April, 2019 RFA(OS) 27/2019 & C.M.Nos.14576-78/2019 MANI DEVI & ORS. versus ..... Appellants SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS RFA(OS) 28/2019 & C.M.Nos.14580-14582/2019 SHALU GUPTA @ SHEELA versus SUNIL KUMAR & ORS + Present: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dhruv Kumra, Advocate for the ..... Respondent ..... Appellant appellants in item no.49. Mr.Neeraj Malhotra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocates for the appellant in item no.50. Mr.Siddhartha Agarwal, Mr.Aditya Wadhwa, Ms.Debopriya Moulik, Ms.Anushree Malviya and Mr.Abhinav Sekhri, Advocates for the defendants in both the mattes. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.14576/2019 in RFA(OS) 27/2019 C.M.14580/2019 in RFA(OS) 28/2019 (exemption from filing trial court record) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exception.2. Applications stand allowed. C.M.14578/2019 in RFA(OS) 27/...
The Chief Secretary, Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors vs.shri j.d. Gup ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"23.04.2019 + W.P.(C) 2255/2019 & C.M. No.10545/2019, C.M. Nos. 10546/2019, 18675/2019 THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Ms. Sripradha Krishnan for Mr. V. ........ Petitioner versus Balaji, Advs. Mr. Yogesh Kumar, DEO Zone XI SHRI J.D. GUPTA (RETD) & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI Through: ........ RESPONDENTS REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assails an order dated 03.08.2018 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (Tribunal), allowing O.A. No.2943/2017 filed by the respondent. In his original application before the Tribunal, the respondent/applicant had prayed for re-fixation of his pension w.e.f. 01.01.2006 in the correct corresponding scale of PB III with a grade pay of Rs.7600/-, that was attached to the post of Principal, from which the res...
Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organistion vs.m/s Labh C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h April, 2019 Date of decision :23rd April, 2019 + O.M.P. 278/2013 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISTION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Moitra and Mr. Sanjoy Advocates. Bhaumik, (M:9971075019) versus M/S LABH CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh and Mr. Advocates. Goel, Nikhil (M:9971633944) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present petition challenges the award dated 14th November, 2012 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator. The Respondent M/s LABH Construction & Industries Ltd. (hereinafter Contractor) was the claimant before the Ld. Arbitrator and the... Petitioner - Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation (hereinafter CGEWHO) is the employer of the Contractor. The Contractor had made various claims before the Ld. Arbitrator and CGEWHO had made various counter claims. O.M.P. 278/2013 Page 1 of 38 2. The backg...
Shri Jaihind & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 23, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2109/2019 SHRI JAIHIND & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Afzal Ahmed, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Madan Mohan Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.287/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 4th September, 2017 (Annexure P-2) and affidavit of 29th March, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Madan Mohan on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2109/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits th...
Mr. Santosh Kumar Garg vs.mr. Jitendra Virwani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :29. 11.2018 Judgment pronounced on:23. 04.2019 CS(OS) 356/2017 MR. SANTOSH KUMAR GARG ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Arvind Nigam,Sr.Adv. with Mr.Avishkar Singhvi, Mr.Nikhil Sharma and Mr.Mehtab Singh Sandhu, Advs. versus MR. JITENDRA VIRWANI & ORS..... Defendant Through Mr. N. Ganapaty, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Balaji Sainivasan, Mr, Ajesh Kumar Shankar and Mr. Pratiksha Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.1344/2018 1. This application is filed by the defendant under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC seeking unconditional leave to defend the suit.2. The accompanying plaint is filed under Order 37 CPC for recovery of Rs.71,86,00,000/- along with interest. The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff and the wife of the plaintiff, namely, Mrs. Ranjana Garg had 40% shares in the company Vikas Telecom Pvt. Ltd. They entered into two share purchase agreements with Embassy Ventures Office Pvt. Ltd. (he...
Vishnu vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 767/2019 Judgment delivered on:23. 04.2019 VISHNU ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajkumar Singh Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Anuj Kumar, P.S.Gandhi Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.170/2018, under Section 3IPC P.S. Gandhi Nagar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant who is a rickshaw puller was sitting next to a railway track along with the accused/petitioner and others and drinking. It is alleged that during drinking there was a fight and the petitioner is alleged to have started abusing the complainant. Thereafter it is alleged that the petitioner pushed the injured and started beating him on account of which he fell on a cement pillar which is used in ra...
Arun Kumar Gupta and Anr. Vs.the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23rdApril, 2019 + MAC. APP. 943/2018 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ...Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Jain, Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty and Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocates. versus 1. SMT. SUNITA2 Ms. RITIKA3 MASTER VARUN4 MASTER VINEET5 SMT. PARKASHI6 SH. RAJENDRA KUMAR (DRIVER) 7. SH. ARUN KUMAR SHARMA (OWNER) ...Respondents Through: Mr. Munish Kumar Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for R-6 to R-7. + MAC. APP. 117/2019 1. ARUN KUMAR GUPTA2 RAJENDRA KUMAR... APPELLANTSThrough: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate. versus 1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.2. SMT. SUNITA3 Ms. RITIKA4 MASTER VARUN MAC. APP. 943/2018 & 117/2019 Page 1 of 13 5. MASTER VINEET6 SMT. PARKASHI ...Respondents Through: Mr. S.P. Jain, Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty and Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Munish Kumar Sharma, Advocate for R-2 to R CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
Bhuvanesh Vyas vs.i.g.n.o.u.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
+ W.P.(C) 104/2008 BHUVANESH VYAS Date of decision:23. 04.2019 ........ Petitioner * $~R~10A IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.A.P. Nagrath, Adv. versus I.G.N.O.U. Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside office order no.488 dated 07.04.1993 communicated vide letter dated 11.06.1993. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to take the petitioner back on duty with all consequential benefits.2. The brief facts of the case are the petitioner was appointed as Senior Software Engineer in IGNOU in the pay scale of 3700-6700 vide letter dated 02.06.1989 and joined on 11.07.1989 at Delhi. Thereafter the petitioner was confirmed w.e.f. 11.07.1990 vide letter dated 6/7.02.1991.3. The petitioner applied for leave for 90 days to visit USA vide W.P.(C) 104/2008 Page 1 of 10 application dated 04.09.1992 and his leave application was a...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »