Delhi Court April 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
sh.kishore Aggarwal vs.the Additional Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~51, 52 & 55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4131/2019 + W.P.(C) 4132/2019 + W.P.(C) 4151/2019 SH. KRISHAN KISHORE AGGARWAL SH. ASHOK KUMAR YOGI SH. KISHORE AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Adv. in W.P.(C) 4131/2019 & 4151/2019. Mr. Amor Nath Tiwari, Adv. in W.P.(C) 4132/2019. versus THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Std. Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % CM APPL.18617/2019 in W.P.(C) 4131/2019 CM APPL.18618/2019 in W.P.(C) 4132/2019 CM APPL.18709/2019 in W.P.(C) 4151/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C) Nos.4131/2019, 4132/2019 & 4151/2019 Page 1 of 7 W.P.(C) 4131/2019, W.P.(C) 4132/2019 & W.P.(C) 4151/2019 1. The narrow ground on which the petitioners question the common...
Shalu Gupta @ Sheela vs.sunil Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~49 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:23. d April, 2019 RFA(OS) 27/2019 & C.M.Nos.14576-78/2019 MANI DEVI & ORS. versus ..... Appellants SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS RFA(OS) 28/2019 & C.M.Nos.14580-14582/2019 SHALU GUPTA @ SHEELA versus SUNIL KUMAR & ORS + Present: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Dhruv Kumra, Advocate for the ..... Respondent ..... Appellant appellants in item no.49. Mr.Neeraj Malhotra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocates for the appellant in item no.50. Mr.Siddhartha Agarwal, Mr.Aditya Wadhwa, Ms.Debopriya Moulik, Ms.Anushree Malviya and Mr.Abhinav Sekhri, Advocates for the defendants in both the mattes. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.14576/2019 in RFA(OS) 27/2019 C.M.14580/2019 in RFA(OS) 28/2019 (exemption from filing trial court record) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exception.2. Applications stand allowed. C.M.14578/2019 in RFA(OS) 27/...
M/S Nutech Security Printers vs.smt Geeta Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. d April, 2019 + MAC.APP. 746/2013 M/S NUTECH SECURITY PRINTERS ...Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Kohli, Ms. Pooja Vohra, Advocates. versus 1. SMT GEETA DEVI2 SHRI BABU RAM PANDEY3 SHRI JAI SINGH4 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.5. SHRI SARDAR SINGH6 M/S PRAVEEN TRANSPORT COMPANY ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra Advocates for R-1 and R- 2, R-3. Mr. J.P.N. Shahi with Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. The instant appeal is arising out of the impugned award dated 16.02.2013 in MACT Case No.5passed by Mr. Prem Kumar Barthwal, Presiding Officer, MACT (SE-01), Saket Courts, New Delhi (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs. 2,29,500/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Twenty Nine Thousand and Five MAC.APP. 746/2013 Page 1 of 10 Hundred Only) alongwith interest at rate of 7.5% p.a. from the date of filing of petition till the date of it...
Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 950/2018 and CM APPL. 4024/2018 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT. LTD......... Petitioner Through: Mr Gaurav Mahajan and Mr Saksham Babbar, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr T.P. Singh, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr S. Nanda Kumar, MsTanu Priya Gupta, Ms Deepika Nanda Kumar and Ms Palani velu, Advocates for BIS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2304.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner claims to be a Global Specialist in Energy Management in Automation. The petitioner is,inter alia, engaged in the manufacture of Low Voltage Capacitors at its facility in Bengaluru, Karnataka. The petitioner claims that it has over 80% of the market share of the said product in India.2. The petitioner has filed the present petition,inter alia,praying as under:-"W.P. (C) 950/2018 Page 1 of 7 i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus toResponde...
Sh. Krishan Kishore Aggarwal vs.the Additional Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~51, 52 & 55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4131/2019 + W.P.(C) 4132/2019 + W.P.(C) 4151/2019 SH. KRISHAN KISHORE AGGARWAL SH. ASHOK KUMAR YOGI SH. KISHORE AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Adv. in W.P.(C) 4131/2019 & 4151/2019. Mr. Amor Nath Tiwari, Adv. in W.P.(C) 4132/2019. versus THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Std. Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % CM APPL.18617/2019 in W.P.(C) 4131/2019 CM APPL.18618/2019 in W.P.(C) 4132/2019 CM APPL.18709/2019 in W.P.(C) 4151/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C) Nos.4131/2019, 4132/2019 & 4151/2019 Page 1 of 7 W.P.(C) 4131/2019, W.P.(C) 4132/2019 & W.P.(C) 4151/2019 1. The narrow ground on which the petitioners question the common...
Janak Rani & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d April, 2019 + CRL.A. 456/2002 JANAK RANI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manoj Swarup, Senior Advocate with Dr. Mansi Jain, & Ms. Vidisha Swarup, Advocates with appellants in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Kaushik Ghosh, PS Shahdara. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Geeta Rani, aged about 25 years at the relevant point of time, daughter of Krishna Rani (PW-2), sister of Raj Kumar (PW-4), was married to Rakesh Sharma on 07.03.1994. From out of their cohabitation, a female child named Tanvi also called by the nick name Tannu took birth on 01.12.1994. The matrimonial family of Geeta had a house described as No.1/6806, Lahoriya Gali, East Rohtash Nagar, Delhi within the jurisdiction of Police Station Shahdara. Her parental family, i.e. Krishna Rani (mother) and her siblings, on the other hand, would live in Dilshad Garden, cl...
Satish Kumar & Ors vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
20 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1054/2015 & CM18552015 SATISH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Rahul Sharma, Ms Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Mr Bilal Ali and Mr C.K. Bhatt, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate LAC/L&B. Mr Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD. Mr Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr Rajeev Jha and Ms Komal Sorout, Advocates. + DIXIT YADAV & ANR. ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 5753/2015 & CM103432015 Through: Mr Rahul Sharma, Ms Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Mr Bilal Ali and Mr C.K. Bhatt, Advocates. versus Through: Mr Gautam Narayan, ASC DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS for GNCTD with Ms Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocates. Mr Ajay Verma, Senior Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr Arjun Pant, ASC. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Starding Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate LAC/L&B. W.P.(C) 1054/2015 & W.P.(C) 5753/2015 Page 1 of 7 CO...
Himalay International Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6666/2017 & CM No.27757/2017 HIMALAY INTERNATIONAL LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ankit Parhar, Mr Aviral Dhirendra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC, Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Anju Gupta, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2304.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a order/letter dated 30.11.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) cancelling the approval for grant-in-aid, under the Government Scheme of Cold Chain Value Addition and Preservation Infrastructure (for non-horticulture product) during the remainder of 12th plan (2013- 17)(hereafter the scheme).2. The petitioners project was approved by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries Government of India on 27.09.2013 for financial assistance to the extent of extent of 10 crores. The said approval was for setting up plant at Tehsil V...
Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs.telefonaktiebolget Lm Ericsson
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 01.2019 Pronounced on:23. 04.2019 FAO (OS) (COMM) 169/2017 & C.M. APPL.4963/2018 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ......Appellant Through: Sh. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Ashok. K. Aggarwal, Sh. Samrat Nigam, Ms. Radhika, Ms. Snigdha Sharma, Ms. Ritwik Sneha and Sh. Gaurav Priyadarshi, Advocates. Versus TELEFONAKTIEBOLGET L.M. ERICSSON .....Respondent Through: Sh. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Advocate, Sh. C.M. Lall, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Saya Choudhary, Sh. Ashutosh Kumar, Sh. Prateek Sehrawat, Sh. Adithya Jayaraj, Sh. Rupin Bahl, Ms. Karnika Kanwar, Sh. Devansu Khanna and Sh. Ujjwal Sinha, Advocates. Sh. Prasanta Varma, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Shalu Goswami, Advocates, for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. By order dated 4th December, 2017, this court had reserved orders on the merits of the appeal. However, was informed that in the mean...
Union of India Ministry of Communications Department of Telecommunicat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 452/2018 & I.A. No.14978/2018 Reserved on:31. 10.2018 Pronounced on:23. 04.2019 UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Mr. L.B. Rai, Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma and Mr. Kartik Rai, Advs versus SHYAM TELECOM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kanika Sinha, Ms. Tanmaya Sinha, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1 This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act) against the Award dated 27.07.2018. The petitioner before me is, in effect, the Department of Telecommunication (hereafter referred to as DOT). The DOT has preferred the instant petition via Union of India, Ministry of Communication (in short UOI). The respondent, on the other hand, is a company by the n...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »