Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vestige Marketing Private Limited vs.flipkart Internet Private Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 540/2019 VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi K. Awasthi and Mr. Vikram Patralekh, Advs. Versus FLIPKART INTERNET PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ....Defendants Through: Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Saurabh Srivastava, Ms. Shilpa Gupta and Mr. Ranjeet Singh Sidhu, Advs. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER2210.2019 % IA No.14730/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) 540/2019 & IAs No.14729/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 14731/2019 (u/S151CPC) 3. The plaintiff, claiming to be Direct Selling Entity, has instituted this suit against Flipkart Internet Private Limited operating an e-marketing platform in the name of Flipkart, and against the unknown defendants, to restrain the defendants from selling on the e-marketing platform of the defendant No.1, the goods which are directly sold by the plaintiff to the consumers. CS(OS) 540/201...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.sh Sameer Dikshit, Irsse & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11238/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh, Mr. Amit Sinha and Mr. Vaibhav Pratap Singh, Advocates versus SH SAMEER DIKSHIT, IRSSE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Mr. Murari Lal and Mr. R.S.M. Kalky, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CAV.PET.1057/2019 1. Learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the caveators.2. The caveat petition is accordingly disposed of. W.P.(C) 11238/2019 3. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. The petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 26.08.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) in OA. No.1158/2019.5. Brief facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of this petition are that responde...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.mayank Kardam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 549/2019 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Ranvir Singh, P.S.: Roop Nagar. versus MAYANK KARDAM Through None. ........ RESPONDENTS Date of Decision:22. d October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CRL. M.A. 37685/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CRL. M.A. 37684/2019 (condonation of delay) Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 549/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 27th April, 2019 Page 1 of 10 CRL. L.P. 549/2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-01 (POCSO), Central Delhi arising out of FIR No.327/2015 registered with Police Station Roop Nagar.2. The ...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 748/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through: Court on its own motion ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Rajula Gaur, Advs. for R-6 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2210.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 748/2019 1. A letter written by the citizens of Delhi has been converted into a Public Interest Litigation which is about the unauthorised use of the land and properties situated at Village Bhatti, Saket, New Delhi.2. We have heard counsel appearing for the Respondent No.6 who has filed a detailed affidavit and has submitted that respondent No.6 and her family members are the joint owner of the properties i.e. khasra nos. 41 and 44 of Village Bhatti, Saket, New Delhi. It is also submitted by counsel for the Respondent No.6 that there is no illegal construction nor any ill...
Venkat Narayan vs.the Vice Chancellor, Faculty of Science, University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:22. 10.2019 W.P.(C) 9296/2019 & CM No.42374/2019 VENKAT NARAYAN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Apurb Lal, and Ms. Meenu Pandey, Advocates. versus THE VICE CHANCELLOR, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY ENCLAVE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, and Mr. for Kausik Ghosh, Advocates University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER (ORAL):1. In the instant writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that even though he belongs to the EWS category, he could not obtain admission in that category as the application form did not advert to EWS category.2. The petitioner seeks admission in the academic session 2019-2020 in LL.B. course. It is not in dispute that the petitioner sat in the Delhi University Entrance Test (in short DUET) and was ranked 123 in the common merit list.3. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, who appears on behalf of the University of Delhi, says th...
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.ram Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 29/2016 Decided on:22. 10.2013 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus + MAC.APP. 28/2016 RAM DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Dinesh Malik, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Ankit Choudhary, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. On the previous date the following order was passed: The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the requisite amount has been deposited. The learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to obtain instructions and file such documents as he may seek to rely upon in MAC.APP. No.29/2016 & 28/2016 Page 1 of 6 support of his request for release of the remaining amount of the awarded compensation. 2. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no objection to the release of...
Pradeep vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h October, 2019 Date of Decision:22. d October, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1828/2019 PRADEEP STATE Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. ........ Petitioner with Mr. Vikram Panwar, Mr. Pardeep Dabas, Mr. Vikas Walia and Mr. Suyash Sinha, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State with Shri Kulbir Singh, ACP/Chhawla and ASI Satbir Singh from Police Station- Dwarka, Sector-28 Ms. Yashima Sharma, Adv. for the complainant BAIL APPLN. 1833/2019 DEEPAK GODARA & ANR. Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. ........ Petitioners with Mr. Vikram Panwar, Mr. Pardeep Dabas, Mr. Vikas Walia and Mr. Suyash Sinha, Advs. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State with Shri Kulbir Singh, ACP/Chhawla and ASI Satbir Singh from Police Station- Dwarka, Sector-28 Bail Appn.1828/2019, 1833/2019 & 1836/2019 Page 1 of 10 + BAIL APPLN. 1836/2019 Ms. Yashima Sharma, Adv. for the complainant HARENDER STATE Thr...
Meena Dabas vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. 10.2019 % Pronounced on :22. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4451/2019 MEENA DABAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Aashita Khanna and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. Insp. Balbir Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition U/s 482 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking quashing of F.I.R. bearing No.761/2014 U/s 420 IPC registered at P.S. Shahabad Dairy and charge sheet dated 03.05.2016 pending adjudication before the Court of Sh. Manu Goel Kharab, Ld. MM, Rohini Courts, Delhi.2. The facts of the case are that one Bhushan Jain filed a complaint U/s 156 (3) Cr.P.C and the Ld. M.M vide order dated 04.07.2014, issued directions to register an F.I.R. In his complaint, the complainant Bhushan Jain has alleged that he is the lawful owner of CRL. MC44512019 Page 1 of 7 pr...
Union Public Service Commission vs.r.a. Khan and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h October, 2019 Decided on:22. d October, 2019 W.P.(C) 13439/2009 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Vibhuti and Mr. Tapasvi Raj, Tyagi Advocates. R.A. KHAN AND OTHERS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for DoPT. Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms.Seerat Deep Singh, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate for Intervenors. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Ms. Palak Rohmetra and Ms. Laveena Arora, Advocates for R-9 & R-10. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 This petition by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) assails an order dated 9th September, 2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) allowing the OA No.1453/2009 filed by the... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 13439/2009 Page 1 of 15 Nos.1 to 8, directing the... RESPONDENTS Nos.9 to 11 herein i.e. the Government of NCT of Del...
Gaurav Enterprises vs.janakpuri Super Specialty Hospital & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 677/2019 Date of decision:22. 10.2019 $~ A-33 * % + GAURAV ENTERPRISES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate versus JANAKPURI SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14759/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 677/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. An agreement dated 06.09.2007 was signed between the parties for deployment of Security Guards in the premises of Super Specialty Hospital, Janak Puri. ARB.P. 677/2019 Page 1 of 5 3. Disputes having arisen between the parties, an Arbitrator was appointed by this Court on 04.11.2016 in Arb.P. 478/2016. An Award was ...