Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Salahuddin vs.mahajan Tanners Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~C-15 & 16 * % + CO.PET. 375/2011 SALAHUDDIN Through: Date of decision:22. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAHAJAN TANNERS LTD & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani & Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates CRL.O.(CO.) 19/2014 MAHAJAN TANNER LTD.(IN PROV. LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani & Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates ASHOK MAHAJAN(MANAGING DIRECTOR) & ORS. versus Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH ........ RESPONDENTS JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) CO. APPL. 1121/2019 IN CO.PET. 375/2011 1. This application has been filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying that Mahajan Tanners Ltd. (in liquidation) be dissolved and the Official Liquidator be discharged as its Liquidator.2. It is stated that the Official Liquidator was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator by order dated 11.04.2013 in Mahajan Tanners Ltd. CO.PET. 375/2011 & CRL.O.(CO.) 19/2014 Page 1 of 4 her...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.jahida & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 465/2018 Decided on:22. 10.2019 Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JAHIDA & ORS Through: Mr. Kunwar Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Anjum Javed, ASC. ........ RESPONDENTS NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 23.02.2018 1. passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.268/2017, insofar as the appellant has been granted right of recovery, but the appellant seeks discharge from payment of any liability on the ground that the premium apropos the insurance policy was never received because the cheque issued for the same was dishonoured. It is stated that the notice of dishonour of the cheque had been posted by the appellant to the insured and the policy had been cancelled. However, the learned counsel for the appellant is unable to show any proof apropos the posting of the said notice.2. The Court would note that the lis then prim...
Ms. G. Kapoor vs.m/s Reacon Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
+ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 % ARB.P. 131/2019 MS. G. KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.R. P. Singh, Adv. versus M/S REACON ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. K. Ghosh and Ms.Tina Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator. The facts as noted from the petition and contended by Mr. Kapur are, the petitioner is the sole proprietor of M/s. JPE International and is engaged in business of contracts for electrical work, structural and other business related to electrical works.2. The petitioner and the respondent entered into an agreement for carrying out internal electrical works for renovation and expansion of ESIC Hospital, Okhla Project. The main contract was between ESIC and TCIL. A further sub-contrac...
Dr. Deepika Veerwal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * Judgment Reserved on 01.10.2019 % + W.P.(C) 7747/2019 & CM No.32175/2019 DR. DEEPIKA VEERWAL Judgment Pronounced on 22.10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, Ms. Deeksha Gaur, and Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R- 1/UOI & R-3/VMMC. Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, and Mr. Rohan Anand, Advocates for R- 2/NBE. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Arunima Pal, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Mr. Abijit, Mr. Tarun Verma, Ms. Manpret Kaur, and Ms. Sumangla, Advs. for R-4/MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface: The main grievance of the petitioner veers around denial of admission to her in the DNB Broad Specialty (Post MBBS) course [in short DNB (Post MBBS) course]. in the academic session January 2019 by respondent No.2 i.e. the National Board of Examinations (hereafter referred to as the NBE)...
R P Gupta vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1323/2018 R P GUPTA Through: None versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R- 1/UOI Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC-GNCTD with Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Adv. for R-2,3,4,6,8 to 11 Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, SPP-CBI with Mr. T.P. Singh, Adv. for R-7/CBI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2210.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 1323/2018 1. When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.2. We have heard counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11.3. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : W.P.(C) 1323/2018 Page 1 of 3 a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or similar writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing an investigation to be conducted against the Respondent No.11' and/or b) I...
Sh. Bijender @ Vijay Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~51 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5439/2019 Date of decision:22. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv. versus SH. BIJENDER @ VIJAY KUMAR & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. Mr. Sachin Kumar, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Vijay Kumar, PS Vijay Vihar JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 38893/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5439/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1162/2017 dated 12.09.2017 registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the CRL.M.C. 5439/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.02.2017 as per Hind...
New Delhi Municipal Council vs.v3s Infratech Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~8 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 297/2019 & C.M. APPLs.46331-46333/2019 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Harsh Peechara, ASC with Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate versus .....Respondent Through: None V3S INFRATECH LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant/NDMC is aggrieved by the judgment dated 22.11.2017, ORDER2210.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a petition filed by it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 whereunder, a challenge was laid to an Arbitral Award dated 16.06.2017, passed by the Sole Arbitrator. In the said petition, the challenge to the Award was confined to the findings returned by the Sole Arbitrator in respect of Issues No.11 & 15, which was turned down. Accompanying the present appeal are two applications for seeking condonation of delay of 12 days in filing and 59 days in re-filing the appeal (C.M. APPLs.46331/2019 & 46333/2019...
Krishna Devi & Ors. Vs.krishan Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 10.2019 C.R.P. 110/2019 KRISHNA DEVI & ORS ........ Petitioners versus KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar with Mr. Paramjeet, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns order dated 16.04.2019, whereby, learned District Judge approved the proclamation of the sale of the Property No.217/2, Gali No.7, Padam Nagar, Kishanganj, Delhi.2. A Suit for partition was filed by respondent No.1 contending that subject property was the property owned by late Smt. Mukhtiary Devi wife of late Sh. Sumer Chand Sharma. It was contended that Sh. Sumer Chand Sharma and Smt. Mukhtiary Devi had 6 children 3 sons and 3 daughters and one son had predeceased and accordingly, the estate had devolved on the 5...
Yogender Prasad Aggarwal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :11. 10.2019 Pronounced on :22. 10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2564/2019 YOGENDER PRASAD AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. & Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Garg Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Mr. Sanjeev Seshadri and Ms. Niharika Kaul, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar, P.S.K.M.Pur. Mr. Sudhir Naagar and Mr. Mohit Singh, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER Crl. M.A. 37838/2019 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. Bail Appln. 2564/2019 Page 1 of 6 BAIL APPLN. 2564/2019 1. This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0029/2018 U/s 420/468/471 IPC registered at Police Station- K.P. Pur.2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainant is the co- owner of the property bea...
Hari Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner + W.P.(CRL) 2941/2019 HARI SINGH $~5 * Through Mr. Nitish Gupta, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC with Ms. Shrestha Bharati and Mr. Shivam Saharan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J( Oral) The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C) has been filed seeking release of the petitioner on parole for the marriage of his daughter which is scheduled for 09.11.2019. Status report has been handed over in Court. Same is placed on record. The fact regarding the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner has been verified by the Station House Officer, P.S.: Domestic Airport, New Delhi. Keeping in view the fact that the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner is scheduled for 09.12.2019, he (petitioner) is directed to be release...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »