Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alok Bhandari & Anr. Vs.mukesh Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2019 RC.REV. 385/2019 & CM APPL. 28998/2019 % + ALOK BHANDARI & ANR. versus MUKESH CHANDER ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishabh Wadhwa and Mr. Raghav Goyal, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Ashok Anand and Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners who are owners/landlord of the subject property impugn order dated 12.03.2019 whereby leave to defend was granted to the respondents.2. The subject eviction petitions were filed by the respondents on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction from shop No.1, H-4, Ground Floor, Main Market, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-110027 more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to RC.REV. 385/2019 Page 1 of 11 the eviction pet...
Gypsum Structural India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.gail (India) Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :01. 10.2019. + W.P.(C) 10649/2019 & CM APPL. Nos. 44021-22/2019 GYPSUM STRUCTURAL INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Samar Bansal & Ms. Devahuti Pathak & Ms. Aditi Sharma, Advocates. versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for GAIL with Ms.Nazia Parveen, Advocate for R1. Mr. Abhimanyu Garg, Advocate for R2 with Ms.Smitha Sehgal, Senior Manager (Legal), Ms.Sunita Mitra, General Manager (SCM) & Mr.Salman Q. Khan, Deputy Manager (Legal) for R2/EIL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari and a direction for calling for the records of the respondents pertaining to tender document No.B035-TENDER_DOC-B035-002-83-41-MK-T-9508 (E-TENDER No.8000014...
Lilu Ram Garg & Anr. Vs.pallavi Mehra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2019 RC.REV. APPL.42669/2019 & 42670/2019 563/2019 & CAV.958/2019 & CM LILU RAM GARG & ANR PALLAVI MEHRA & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms.Aditi, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr.Hemant Gupta, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 25.03.2019, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondents seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from a shop bearing property No.IX/6310 (new No.) & 542 (Old No.) Main road, RC.REV. 563/2019 Page 1 of 3 Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031, more particularly shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction ...
Re-In the Matter of Lalaji Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~C-4 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 217/1990 RE-IN THE MATTER OF LALAJI PAPER MILLS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Advocate, Standing Counsel, with D. K. Singh, OL in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) CO. APPL. 1050/2019 1. This application has been moved by the Official Liquidator under Section 481, Companies Act, 1956, read with Rules 9 & 281 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred as CCR), primarily praying for dissolution of the Company (in Liqdn.), namely, M/s Lalji Paper Mills (P) Ltd.2. Perusal of the application reveals that this Company came to be wound up vide Order dated 23.08.1991, where after the Official Liquidator took over the Company (in Liqdn.). On the basis of investigation, following assets were seized:-"i. The Registered Office of the company, being L-92, First floor, Lalji Shopping Complex, Munirka, New Delhi-67, and, CO.PET. 217/199...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›