Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tek Chand Aggarwal vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :11. 10.2019 Pronounced on :22. 10.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2565/2019 TEK CHAND AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. & Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Garg Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Mr. Sanjeev Seshadri and Ms. Niharika Kaul, Advs. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar, P.S.-K.M.Pur. Mr. Sudhir Naagar and Mr. Mohit Singh, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER Crl. M.A. 37839/2019 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. Bail Appln. 2565/2019 Page 1 of 6 BAIL APPLN. 2565/2019 1. This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0029/2018 U/s 420/468/471 IPC registered at Police Station- K.P. Pur.2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainant is the co- owner of t...
Mahajan Tanner Ltd.(in Prov. Liqn.) vs.ashok Mahajan(managing Director ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~C-15 & 16 * % + CO.PET. 375/2011 SALAHUDDIN Through: Date of decision:22. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAHAJAN TANNERS LTD & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani & Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates CRL.O.(CO.) 19/2014 MAHAJAN TANNER LTD.(IN PROV. LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani & Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates ASHOK MAHAJAN(MANAGING DIRECTOR) & ORS. versus Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH ........ RESPONDENTS JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) CO. APPL. 1121/2019 IN CO.PET. 375/2011 1. This application has been filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying that Mahajan Tanners Ltd. (in liquidation) be dissolved and the Official Liquidator be discharged as its Liquidator.2. It is stated that the Official Liquidator was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator by order dated 11.04.2013 in Mahajan Tanners Ltd. CO.PET. 375/2011 & CRL.O.(CO.) 19/2014 Page 1 of 4 her...
Asianet Star Communications Pvt Ltd. Vs.the Registrar of Trademarks & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11284/2019 Through: Mr. ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Saikrishna Rajgopal, Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Sumant Narang, Ms. Abhiti Vacher and Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Advocates. (M:80175. 1175) versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Ms. Eshita Baruah and Ms. Prapti Mehta, Advocates. (M:99992. 5585) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 46494/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 11284/2019 & CM APPL. 46493/2019 (interim direction) 2. This writ petition has been filed by the... Petitioner bringing to the notice of the Court that the trademark of the... Petitioner was deemed to have been abandoned for non-filing of renewal fee and seeking permission to renew the same. The stand of the... Petitioner is that the...
Amit Sharma vs.anuj Kochaar & Ors (The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~32 * % + ANUJ KOCHAAR & ORS (THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Deepika Mishra, Adv. for R- 1 & 2. Mr. S.P. Jain, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir & Mr. Ravi Gupta, Advs. for Insurance Company. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 602/2019 AMIT SHARMA Decided on:22. 10.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Peeush Sharma & Mr. Bharvi Thakur & Mr. Kartikey Nayyar, Advs. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 17.01.2019 1. passed by the learned MACT in MACT No.328/2018. The appellant seeks enhancement of the compensation awarded on the ground that, it being established that he has suffered permanent disability to the extent of 10% in his spine, it ought to have been taken into consideration by the learned Tribunal in computation of loss of earnings for the resultant difficulty in his movement.2. The impugned order has held that there was nothing on record to show that the appellant has s...
Savitri Devi @Savitri Tiwari & Anr vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5438/2019 SAVITRI DEVI @SAVITRI TIWARI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Naman Raj Thakur and Mr. Anuj Kr. Ranjan, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State SI Vijay Pal, PS Sarojini Nagar R-2 in person ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.227/2014 dated 18.04.2014, registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Notice issued.3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 5438/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.6. R...
Anand Puri Govind vs.north Delhi Municial Ccrporation & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11650/2017 ANAND PURI GOVIND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P.S. Sirohi and Mr. Sunil Sirohi, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIAL CCRPORATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal and Mr. Ajay Harshana, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Giriraj Subramanium and Mr. Rohan Jain, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2210.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 11650/2017 1. This so called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : (a) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the North Delhi Municipal Corporation /Respondent No.1 and Delhi Development Authority/Respondent No.2 to erase the above mentioned zig-zag pathway constructed by the North Delhi Municipal W.P.(C) 11650/2017 Page 1 of 3 Corporation (Respondent No.1) and Delhi Development Authority (Respondent No.2) in Febr...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.geeta Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 10.2019 MAC.APP. 474/2019 & CM APPL. 18224/2019 IFFCO TOKIO GNERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates. versus GEETA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI and R-2. NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 02.02.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.440/17, on the ground that the father being a government employee in the Flood and Irrigation Department, would not be considered as dependent. Nevertheless, the dependency of the mother is not in doubt and the income of the deceased would therefore be liable to be deducted by 50%. The same has already been done in the impugned order.2. The Court would note that the parents of the deceased have been granted Rs. 1 lac for compensation towards loss of love and affection of their son, who was barely 23 years of...
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.ravidner Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 29/2016 Decided on:22. 10.2013 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus + MAC.APP. 28/2016 RAM DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Dinesh Malik, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Ankit Choudhary, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. On the previous date the following order was passed: The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the requisite amount has been deposited. The learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to obtain instructions and file such documents as he may seek to rely upon in MAC.APP. No.29/2016 & 28/2016 Page 1 of 6 support of his request for release of the remaining amount of the awarded compensation. 2. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no objection to the release of...
Yogender Kumar & Ors vs.directorate of Health Services Govt of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI JITENDER KUMAR Reserved on:10. h October 2019 Decided on:22. d October, 2019 LPA792014 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Mr. Anuj Agarwal and Mr. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) for GNCTD. YOGENDER KUMAR & ORS LPA7312014 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Mr. Anuj Agarwal and Mr. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates. Mr. Atul T.N. and Mr. Devendra Verma, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC ..... Respondent (Civil) for GNCTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Both these appeals arise out of a set of facts and involve the same LPA Nos. 79/2014 & 731/2014 Page 1 of 11 question of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment.2. LPA No.79/2014 by Jitender Kumar is directed against...
M/S Apco-Titan (Jv) vs.national Highways and Infrastructure Developmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September, 2019 Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + CS (OS) 215/2019 M/S APCO-TITAN (JV) ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. A. K. Ganguli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dharmendra Rautray, Ms. Tara Shahani and Mr. Shivansh Jolly, Advocates. (M:84699. 9172) versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG for Srinivasan, UOI. Mr. Ramji Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, Mr. Karan Khanna, Mr. Nikhil Yadav and Ms. Tishta Tandon Advocates Applicants (SSTL/ITNL) (M:91679. 0441) Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, Mr. Kabir Shankar Bose, Mr. Upmanyu Tewar and Ms. Gumoor Kaur, Advocates for NHIDC. (M:98110. 9118) for CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. Nos. 5576/19, 106and 68Brief Facts 1. The present case demonstrates the difficulties plaguing construction contracts involving the development of infrastructure projects. CS (OS) 215/2019 Pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »