Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
retd.lt.col.attar Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-"23.10.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3028/2019 RETD. LT. COL. ATTAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Deepak K. Tyagi, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shubhra Parashar and Mr. U.P.S. Charak and Mr. Shreyans Jain, Advocates for R-1/UOI Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Inspector Dinesh Tejwan and SI Niraj Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J(Oral) Vide this petition, the petitioner is seeking issuance of directions for 1. their protection from respondent Nos. 5 to 8 as he apprehends threat to his life from them.2. Learned ASC for State submits that there are two factions fighting over the property in question.3. The petitioner has however only prayed for protection so that respondents do not threat him or indulge in illegal activities.4. Learned ASC submits that protection required will be provided to the petitioner.5....
Parveen@kallu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:07. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 10.2019 + CRL.A. 1317/2015 AARTI STATE + CRL.A. 351/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Ms.Joshini Tuli and Ms.Divya Jangid, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent State. AND RISHI KUMAR BHATI STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.D.Pandey, Advocate. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent CRL.A. 762/2015 State. AND PARVEEN @ KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.Singhal,Ms.Heena Tangi and Mr.Nitish Mittal, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the CRL.A. 497/2015 State. AND SUMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant + + CRL.A. 1317/2015, 351/2015, 762/2015 497/2015 (All connected matters) Page 1 of 61 Through: Mr.Jaideep Malik and Kapoor, Mr.Avinash Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE ...
Csir Indian Institute of Petroleum Theough Director vs.vijay Kumar Sha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"23.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 11305/2019 & C.M. Nos.46550/2019 & 46551/2019 CSIR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM THEOUGH DIRECTOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija and Mr. A. Tiwari, Advs. versus VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Neeraj, Mr. Sahaj Garg, and Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) C.M. No.46551/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 11305/2019 & C.M. No.46550/2019 (stay) 3. The present writ petition by the Management assails the Award dated 06.04.2016 passed the learned Labour Court-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in ID No.54/2009. Under the impugned Award the Labour Court, after holding that the respondents services were WP (C) No.11305/2019 Page 1 of 3 terminated without paying him any retrenchment compensation, has directed the petitioner to pay hi...
Aarti vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:07. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:23. 10.2019 + CRL.A. 1317/2015 AARTI STATE + CRL.A. 351/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Ms.Joshini Tuli and Ms.Divya Jangid, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent State. AND RISHI KUMAR BHATI STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.D.Pandey, Advocate. versus Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the ..... Respondent CRL.A. 762/2015 State. AND PARVEEN @ KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.Singhal,Ms.Heena Tangi and Mr.Nitish Mittal, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the CRL.A. 497/2015 State. AND SUMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant + + CRL.A. 1317/2015, 351/2015, 762/2015 497/2015 (All connected matters) Page 1 of 61 Through: Mr.Jaideep Malik and Kapoor, Mr.Avinash Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE ...
d.k. Shivakumar vs.directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 10.2019 Pronounced on:23. 10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2484/2019, CRL.M.A. 37260/2019 and CRL.M.A. 38212/2019 D.K. SHIVAKUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr Rakesh Khanna, Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advs. along with Mr Mayank Jain, Mr Parmatma Singh and Mr Madhur Jain, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr K.M. Natrajan, ASG, Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr Sharath Nambiar, Mr Anmol Chandan, Mr Mohammad Faraz, Mr Kunal Dutt, Ms Mallika Hiremath and Ms Nidhi Chaudhary, Advs. with Mr Saurabh Mehta, Assistant Director CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. r/w Section 65 PMLA, 2002 on behalf of the petitioner in ECIR/04/HQ/2018.2. The petitioner was arrested on 03.09.2019 and remained in custody of BAIL APPLN. 2484/2019 Page 1 of 19 the Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi, for 15 days and is presently in jud...
Raghubir Singh Arora & Anr vs.rajesh Khanna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. hSeptember, 2019 Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 CM(M) 1062/2019 &CM APPLS. 31780/2019, 31781/2019, 31782/2019 RAGHUBIR SINGH ARORA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Ms. Veena Rupana, Advocates (M-9911669894) Versus RAJESH KHANNA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar & Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate (M-9971149344) AND CM(M) 454/2019 & CAV2802019, CM APPL. 28993/2019 RAJESH KHANNA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar & Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate Versus SURJIT KAUR ARORA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Ms. Veena Rupana, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Advocates Prathiba M. Singh, J.CM(M) 1062/2019 JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioners/Plaintiffs -Raghubir Singh Arora and Mrs. Surjeet Kaur Arora(hereinafter, Plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent, mesne profits and permanent injunction against Mr. Rajesh Khanna and CM(M) 1062/2019&CM(M) ...
Chaman & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 CHAMAN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jyoti Gupta, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Tarang Shrivastava, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Bansi Lal, HC Manoj Kumar, PS K.M. Pur Mr. Deepak Pathak, Adv. for R-2- BSES CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 39061/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.0441/2018 dated 25.12.2018, registered at PS K.M. Pur for the offences punishable under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5486/2019 Page 1 of 2 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final di...
V K Dhingra vs.shri Ram Scientific Industrial Research Foundation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20th September, 2019 Date of decision:23. d October, 2019 CM(M) 1400/2019, CAV9432019, CM APPL. 42303/2019 & CM APPL. 42304/2019 V K DHINGRA Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, Advocate. ........ Petitioner (M:9810012444) SHRI RAM SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION versus Through: Mr. B.K. Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Asst. Manger Legal.. (M:9818020554) ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The present is a classic case of what is wrong in the prevalent tenancy laws. The... Petitioner Shri V. K. Dhingra was appointed as a Senior Analyst with Sri Ram Scientific Industrial Research Foundation (hereinafter Foundation). He was allotted residential accommodation by the Foundation, last of which was at Flat No.A-2, SRI Colony, 19, University Road, Delhi-110007. He was in the employment of the Foundation since 1981 and resigned on 16th July, 1992. He has retained the flat since the...
Shri Shyam Lal Khatana vs.food Corporation of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment :23. d October, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Utkarsh & Ms. Anshu Priyanka, versus Advocates. SHRI SHYAM LAL KHATANA + W.P.(C) 13317/2018, CM Appl. 51784/2018 CORAM: FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi & Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pathak, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner claims to be a contractor specializing in handling food products. The petitioner participated in the e-tender notice dated 09.10.2018 floated by respondents Nos.1 and 2 for appointment of a regular handling contractor at FSD Narela in the Delhi Region. Respondent No.3 has been impleaded as a party, being one of the bidders in the e-tender notice, who was declared as L1.2. Mr. Utkarsh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.3 should not have been declared succe...
Pratyush Sinha vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5467/2019 PRATYUSH SINHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Lathwal, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Tarang Shrivastava, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with Inspector Mukesh Wali, SHO and SI Prity Bala, PS Hazrat Nizamuddin Mr. Radhika Prasad Tiwari, Adv. for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 38994/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5467/2019 3. Notice.4. Learned APP accepts notice and seeks time to file the status report. CRL.M.C. 5467/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing of proceedings against him in FIR No.9/2017 registered at Police Station Hazrat Nizamuddin and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.6. Notice issued.7. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent...