Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ex. Nursing Orderly a.k. Bhagat vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
* % + W.P.(C) 8622/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:14. 08.2019 Judgment delivered on:21. 10.2019 EX. NURSING ORDERLY A.K. BHAGAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr.Hari Shankar Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner to assail the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) dated 23.01.2019 passed in O.A. No.696/2014 dismissing the petitioners Original Application, and dated 11.03.2019 whereby his Review Application (R.A.) 72/2019 was dismissed. The petitioner had assailed his removal from service by way of punishment. W.P.(C.) No.8622/2019 Page 1 of 62 2. Three issues arise for our consideration, including an important question of law,...
Deepak Negi & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5411/2019 DEEPAK NEGI & ORS Through versus THE STATE & ANR ........ Petitioners Mr. Shyam Narayan Pathak with Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Dhananjay Singh and Mr. Y. K. Parashar, Advs. for R-2 SI Shalinendra, PS Ghazipur Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0120/2019 dated 06.05.2019 registered at Police Station Ghazipur and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 5411/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 21.04.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One female child was born out of the wedlock ...
Gaurav Enterprises vs.commissioner ( Transport Department)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~A-46 * % + ARB.P. 660/2019 GAURAV ENTERPRISES IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath & Mr. Mahavir Rawat, Advocates COMMISSIONER ( TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT)..... Respondent versus Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC with Ms. Swati Singh & Ms. Divya Joshi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.14506/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 660/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. An agreement was entered into between the parties on 23.05.2011 with respect to providing security services at the various sites of the respondent. The petitioner deployed its security personnel at the various sites of the respondent with effect from 1.6.2013. As per the petitioner ...
Raj Kumar Kohli and Another vs.reserve Bank of India and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 11281/2017 RAJ KUMAR KOHLI AND ANOTHER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Tandon with Ms. Purnima Singh, Advs. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ramesh Babu with Ms. Manisha Singh and Ms. Sanya Panjwani, Advs. for RBI. Mr. R. Raghav Saket, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. The core grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.2, which is a non-banking financial company, has imposed foreclosure charges qua its loan account without appreciating the fact that a proprietorship concern does not, in law, have an existence separate from its owner who is an individual. 1.1 More specifically, the petitioners contend that the imposition of foreclosure charges is in contravention to the provisions of the Reserve Bank of Indias (RBI) Circular dated 14.7.2014 (hereafter referred to as Circular). It is, important,...
Navneet Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5404/2019 & CRL.M.A. 38774/2019-stay NAVNEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State SI Ashok Kumar, PS Chankya Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 38775/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5404/2019 & CRL.M.A. 38774/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the impugned Order dated 28.09.2019 passed by learned Special Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in the Criminal Revision Petition bearing C.R. No.458/2018, arising in the proceedings of F.I.R. No.15/2016 registered at Police Station Chanakya Puri under Sections 420/468/471/120- CRL.M.C. 5404/2019 Page 1 of 11 B IPC, and to discharge the... Petitioner of the aforesaid Offences.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 14.01.2016, ...
Vinod Kumar Aggarwal vs.poonam Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"21.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 2620/2016 1. VINOD KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Tanisha Setia, Adv. Versus POONAM MISHRA Through: none. .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) None appears for the respondent despite passover. In these circumstances, the petition is taken up for final hearing.2. The present writ petition filed by one of the partners of the erstwhile M/s. G.S. Apparels (hereinafter referred to as the Employer) assails the Award dated 24.11.2014 passed by the learned Labour Court- XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LIR No.876/11. Under the impugned Award the learned Labour Court has, after holding that the respondents termination from service was in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act for short), directed the Employer to pay her a lump sum compensation of Rs.40,000/-.3. Claiming to have been appointed as a Thread Cutter with the ...
Ankush Dabas & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5413/2019 ANKUSH DABAS & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Satish K. Sansi, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. ASI Tej Pal Singh PS Sultanpuri. STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.212/2017 dated 17.03.2017 registered at Police Station Sultanpuri instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A/406/5of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C.541399/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 17.06.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely Khushi Dabas. Due to ext...
M/S. m.d. Esthappan Infrastructures (P) Ltd. Vs.m/s. Gail (India) Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~A-42 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 419/2019 M/S. M.D. ESTHAPPAN INFRASTRUCTURES (P) LTD. Through: Mr. Rajeev Mishra & Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH Through: Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Advocate ..... Respondent JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14685/2019 (Exemption). Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 419/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. This is a petition been filed under Section 29A (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 419/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the Arbitration Clause was invoked. Vide order dated 27.02.2018 passed by this Court,...
Cce Delhi -1 (Now Principal Commissioner of Gst Delhi North) vs.jindal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t October, 2019 + CEAC502018 CCE DELHI -1 (NOW PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GST DELHI NORTH) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Singh Ahluwalia, Adv. versus JINDAL NICKEL AND ALLOYS LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel & Mr. A.K. Prasad, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT2110.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. No.42624/2018 This application has been preferred for condonation of delay of 127 days in filing the appeal. Having heard the counsel for both sides and looking into the reasons stated in the application, there are reasonable grounds for condonation of delay. We hereby condone the delay of 127 days in filing the Central Excise Appeal. The application is allowed and disposed of. CEAC No.50/2018 1. This appeal has been preferred by the Department Union of India CEAC502018 Page 1 of 27 against the order dated 9th October, 2017 pas...
Santosh Devi vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~ 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"21st October, 2019 + FAO2772017 SANTOSH DEVI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D. Sabharwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Shailendra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This appeal brings a challenge to the decision of the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 27.03.2017 whereby the accident claim case of the appellant was dismissed.2. On 02.04.2016, Mr. Vinit Gupta, son of the appellant was found on the railway tracks in the vicinity of Faridabad railway station having suffered injuries and was taken to B.K. hospital, Faribadad where in spite of attempt to afford medical aid and treatment he succumbed to the said injuries. An accident claim case OA(IIu)195/2016 was filed on 05.08.2016 by the appellant before the Railway Claims Tribunal, inter alia, contending that the deceased was travelling as a bona fide passenger on a valid railway journey ticke...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »