Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. K. Saini vs.indraprastha Power Gen Co Ltd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019 W.P.(C) 3711/2016 & CM No.32936/2017 M. K. SAINI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GEN CO LTD AND ORS..... RESPONDENTS Through Mr.R.N.Vats, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Ms. Nidhi Nagpal and Ms. Nupur, Advocates for Ms. Tara Narula, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant petition, the petitioner, in effect, seeks issuance of a Writ of Mandamus for being released the salary for the period from 01.02.2014 to 08.05.2015 by the respondentIndraprastha Power Gen. Co Ltd. in short IPGCL.2. Facts relevant to the relief prayed are that the petitioner has been the employee of IPGCL. Vide transfer order dated 23.10.2012, he was transferred to another company namely Pragati Power Corporation Ltd. in W.P.(C.) No.3711/2016 Page 1 of 3 short PPCL. On 01.11.2012, he was relieved from the services of IPGCL and directed to join the ...
Uma Kant Umesh vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019. + CRL.M.C. 1450/2017 UMA KANT UMESH Through versus Md. Ehraz Zafar, Mr. Akash Tyagi and Mr. Satatya Anand, Advs. ........ Petitioner STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State. Adv. (appearance not given) for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the impugned summoning order dated 11.01.2017 passed by the Ld MM, (NI Act)-04 South-East, Saket Courts and quash the Criminal Complaint bearing No.620506 of 2016 filed under section 138 read with section 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s Kumar Building and Construction Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its Registered Office at B-55/A Kalkaji, New Delhi. Mr. Anuj Kumar CRL.M.C. 1450/2017 Page 1 of 8 is the Director of the aforesaid ...
Atraj & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11014/2018 ATRAJ & ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Kaushik, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1/UOI with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Adv. Mr. T.S. Nanda, Adv. for R-2, 3,9,10,11,12 and 13 Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for R-4/SDMC Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Pawan Kawrani, Advs. for R-5/DDA Mr. Rameezuddin Raja for Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, ASC for R-DJB/R-6 Mr. Siddharth Panda, Adv. for R-7 and 8 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2210.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 11014/2018 1. This so called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : W.P.(C) 11014/2018 Page 1 of 3 a. Issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate suitable writ(s), order(s) and/or direction(s) to the respondents to remove encroachment, demolish illegal unauthorised construction rai...
M/S Chefs Choice vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8641/2019 and CM No.35723/2019 (stay) M/S CHEF'S CHOICE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Mittal and Ms. Shilpa G. Mittal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC for R-1 and 2 Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Mr. Amit Kr. Singh and Mr. Gaurav Prakash, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2210.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 8641/2019 1. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that authorisation has now been granted to the petitioner.2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as per law, such authorisation is not at all required by the petitioner.3. Nonetheless, it has been given now, Respondent No.3 will have to pass an order. W.P.(C) 8641/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. We, therefore, direct the petitioner to prefer a fresh application alongwith the aforesaid auth...
Firoj Khan @ Firoz @ Sonu &Ors vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 2688/2019 FIROJ KHAN @ FIROZ @ SONU &ORS Through Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Mr. Shahid Ali, Adv. for R-2 SI Arjun ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 10756/2019 1. In view of the reasons stated in the present application, the delay in filing the present petition is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. CRL.M.C. 2688/2019 2. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0194/2016 dated 14.04.2016 registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the CRL.M.C. 2688/2019 Page 1 of 3 IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.3. 4. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the cou...
Dr. Naveen Singh & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 22, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 1312/2019 & Crl. M. A. 9630/2019 DR. NAVEEN SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv. with... Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Purnima Malik, Adv. for Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 with SI Yoginder Singh from Police Station-Jagat Puri. Md. Ehraz Zafar and Ms. Poonam, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.318/2018, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at police station Jagatpuri, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue, influence, coercion or pressure W.P.(Crl.) 1312/2019 Page 1 of 2 from any source whatsoever.2. 3. Notice. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent/State accepts no...
Delhi Citizen Forum for Civil Rights (Regd) vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~2075. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11277/2019 % Date of decision:22. d October, 2019. DELHI CITIZEN FORUM FOR CIVIL RIGHTS (REGD) Through: Ms.Divya Ms.Joshini Tuli, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ Petitioner Jangid, Adv. with ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel Ms.Komal Srout, Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT : D. N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) C.M.No.46479/2019 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11220/2019 1. This so called public interest litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: a) Allow this writ petition and issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, for giving directions to the... RESPONDENTS for maintaining and updating the records of land that has been acquired in the state of Delhi-NCR so that interested parties who are in actual possession of the land compulsoril...
The Delhi Motor Truck Owners Union vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10849/2019 Date of Judgment :22. d October, 2019 THE DELHI MOTOR TRUCK OWNERS UNION........ Petitioner Through Mr. Tariq Adeeb, Advocate versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Ms. Anjali Chauhan and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates respondent no.1/EDMC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the tender condition, by which the estimated cost of the earnest money of the tender has been increased by the respondent from Rs.1.0 lakh to Rs.1.25 crores.2. The only submission raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the earnest money fixed is exorbitant and it is an attempt to disqualify small operators at the threshold. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the last tender which was awarded for similar work, the earnest money was fixed at Rs.1.0 lakh....
Ms. Tabassum @ Sonu vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2721/2019 Date of decision: October 22, 2019 MS. TABASSUM @ SONU ........ Petitioner Through Mr. M. Hasibuddin, Advocate versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through SI Sohan Lal, P.S.: Mehrauli Inspector Vinay Kumar, ATO/Khajoori Khas HC Sanjay Kumar, P.S.: Palla Faridabad, Haryana Mr. A.K. Sharma and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates for Respondent nos. 5 and 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 4,5 and 6 have been appeared and state that no threat has been given by them to the petitioner.2. Mobile numbers of Beat Constable, Divisional Officer and the concerned SHO have been already been provided to the petitioner so that she can contact them in case of exigency. The IO, who is present in the Court, assures that the necessary protection shall be provided to the petitioner.3. 4. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Learned counsel for the parties st...
State vs.amjad Khan and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d October,2019 CRL.LP. 577/2019 STATE Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with ........ Petitioner SI Inder Veer Singh, PS Laxmi Nagar. versus AMJAD KHAN & ANR. Through: None CORAM: ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A.No.38876/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. CRL.LP. 577/2019 1. By the present Leave Petition filed under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), the State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 02.08.2019 passed by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Case No.508/17, whereby all the respondents (accused before the Trial Court) were acquitted of the CRL.LP. 577/2019 Page 1 of 12 offence punishable under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to a...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »