Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Kumar Mali vs.assistant Engineer, Dda & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~6 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on :22. d October, 2019 + RFA9142019 & CM APPL Nos.45514-16/2019 RAMESH KUMAR MALI ..... Appellant and Through: Mr.Ashok Kr.Verma Mr.Surendra Tyagi, Advs. versus ASSISTANT ENGINEER, DDA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms.Komal Sorout and Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, Advs. Through: Mr.Dhanesh Relan, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2014 passed by the learned Additional District Judge- 04/North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.482/2014 whereby the suit filed by appellant for permanent injunction and declaration was dismissed in respect of premises admeasuring 300 square feet bearing No.B-36, Gali No.2, Kailash Vihar, Pansali, near Sector 32, Rohini, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit property).2. Admittedly, there is a delay of 1734...
National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology vs.kalpan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8015/2016 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Through Mr. V. S. R. Krishna, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH KALPANA DUDEJA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Goyal and Ms. Ruchira Singh, Advocates for Respondent No.1 ORDER2210.2019 % 1. This is a petition by National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology (NIELIT) challenging an order dated 30th April, 2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT) in T.A. No.04/2014.2. By the impugned order, the CAT quashed the report dated 12th May, 2009 of the Enquiry Officer (EO) holding that of the five Articles of Charge served upon the Respondent by a memorandum dated 8th September, 2008, Charges 1, 2 and 4 were proved and Charge 3 was partly proved. The CAT consequently quashed the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority (DA) ...
Bhanu Pratap Singh vs.govt. Of Nct , Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~2068. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11220/2019 % Date of decision:22. d October, 2019. BHANU PRATAP SINGH Versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shakil Akhtar, Adv. GOVT. OF NCT , DELHI & ORS . ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jamal... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 3/GNCTD. Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Adv. for R-4/SDMC. Akhtar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR for JUDGMENT : D. N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) C.M.No.46185/2019 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11220/2019 1. This so called public interest litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (a) allow the present Writ Petition (Civil) and direct the respondents to stop, seal and demolish the unauthorized and illegal construction of the multi-story building going on at the aforesaid Property No.602- D/19, Near Kali Mandir, Ward No.3, Khasra No.1151/3, Mehrauli, New Delhi admeasuring 2100sq.yards, by issuing the writ of mandamus or any other appr...
Dr. Ramesh Chand vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 10.2019 DR. RAMESH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Chhabra, Adv. $~2 * + W.P.(C) 10510/2019 versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through: Mr. Aman S. Bakhshi, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.43391/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.10510/2019 page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 10510/2019 The present petition is directed against order dated 31.07.2019 by which the OA filed by the petitioner stands dismissed by the Tribunal. The petitioner is working as a Veterinary Surgeon in the Animal Husbandry and Dairying Department, State of Haryana. He proceeded on deputation to North DMC for a period of one year w.e.f. 27.03.2019. On 12.07.2019, the petitioner was repatriated to the parent department, which led to the filing of the...
Lava International Ltd. Vs.anas Ansari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~A~1 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2019 + ARB.P. 96/2019 LAVA INTERNATIONAL LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Nishant Datta, Advocate. versus ANAS ANSARI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1.2. Learned counsel for the parties submits that mediation has failed. Learned counsel for the respondent however submits that the respondent has no objection to the appointment of an Arbitrator and the matter be referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC).3. With the consent of the parties, the matter is referred to DIAC. The parties will appear before DIAC on 8th November, 2019 at 2:00 P.M. The DIAC will appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.4. The Arbitration Proceedings will be held under the aegis of DIAC and as per the procedure of DIAC.5. The fees of the Arbitrator will be fixed as per the Fourth Schedule to the A...
Murari Lal vs.sharda Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 10.2019 RC.REV. 144/2018 MURARI LAL versus SHARDA DEVI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Sahai, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 144/2018 & CM APPL.14249/2018 APPL.25039/2019 (for taking events) (stay), CM into consideration subsequent 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 28.10.2017, whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop measuring 8 x 8 i.e., 64 sq. ft. with height of 7 ft. in property bearing RC.REV.144/2018 Page 1 of 3 No.B-1437, Shastri Na...
Fortune Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs.united Bank of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~15 and 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3549/2014 + FORTUNE MARKETING PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pallav Saxena, Advocate. versus UNITED BANK OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 11334/2015 VINTRON INFORMATICS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Nagendra Kumar with Mr.Chakshu Thakral, Advocates. versus UNITED BANK OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2210.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two petitions arising out of a similar set of facts and raising common issues and are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.2. W.P.(C) 3549 of 2014 by M/s.Fortune Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (FMPL) is W.P.(C) 3549/2014 and W.P.(C) 11334/2015 Page 1 of 8 directed against orders dated 1st August, 2013 and 2nd April, 2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT)-2 in OA No.277 of 2001 and Debt Recovery Appellat...
Edwin Murmu vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 707/2017 and CRL.M.A. 3076/2017 EDWIN MURMU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetanya Puri, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. Ms. Mumtaz Ahmed with Sh. Satish Sharma, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the impugned order dated 25.11.2016 passed by the Special Judge (PC Act), (CBI-6) Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CA No.87titled as Edwin Murmu vs. Smt. Prem.2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent No.2 was solemnised on 24.12.2008 and after marriage, on 28.12.2008, the petitioner and respondent No.2 went to Assam due to the fear of family members of the respondent No.2 and decided to live there. However, on 05.01.2009, the CRL.M.C. 707/2017 Page 1 of 7 family members of the petitioner resolemnized the...
Saurabh Luthra vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5449/2019 SAURABH LUTHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sher Singh Chauhan, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS SI Dhananjay Gupta, PS Janak Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the FIR No.157/2017 registered at Police Station - Janak Puri, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 468/471/420/467 IPC.2. Present petition has been filed on the ground that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 have amicably settled their disputes on their own accord, free and sweet will and consent without any pressure and coercion from any corner.3. Since respondent No.2/ complainant has settled all his grievances and CRL.M.C54492019 Page 1 of 3 misunderstandings have already been sorted out amicably out of the Court and both the part...
Rosi Alias Rosy vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1117/2019 ROSI alias ROSY ..... Appellant Through Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Advocate with Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Mr. Brahm Pandey, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Shallu, P.S.: Krishna Nagar. Date of Decision:22. d October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:(Oral) CRL.M.A. 36994/2019 Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. CRL.A. 1117/2019 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-prosecutrix challenging the judgment and order dated 31st May, 2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.122/2018 arising out of FIR No.400/2017 under Section 376(2)(n)/ Page 1 of 8 CRL. A.1117/2019IPC registered with Police Station Krishna...