Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports vs.swiss Timing Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 296/2019 and CM APPL. 46275-46277/2019 1. MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS & SPORTS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal, Advocate versus SWISS TIMING LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashim, Ms. Roopali Singh, Ms. Sayobani Basu, Mr. Rhythm Barua and Mr. Arman Pratap Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 25.07.2019, passed ORDER2110.2019 by the learned Single Judge, dismissing a petition filed by it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the A&C Act), assailing an Arbitral Award dated 21.06.2017, passed by an Arbitral Tribunal, comprising of three retired Judges of the Supreme Court.2. The dispute between the parties was in relation to Timing, Scoring and Results System Services Agreement dated 11.03.2010, executed between the Organ...
The Swastik Hand Made Paper Pcis Ltd. & Anr vs.m/s Toyin Woodcraft (In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~C-29 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 169/2001 THE SWASTIK HAND MADE PAPER PCIS LTD. & ANR Through: ........ Petitioners versus M/S TOYIN WOODCRAFT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Aayushmaan, Advocates for Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) Co. Appl. No.1111/2019 1. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator seeking the following prayers: i. Permit the Official Liquidator to release such amount to the Secured Creditor i.e. India SME Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., as would be available on the date of dissolution of the Company; ii. Permit the Official Liquidator to close the books of Accounts of the Company (In Liqn.) maintained by the office of the Official Liquidator, Delhi; CO.PET. 169/2001 Page 1 of 6 Pass an order dissolving the Company under Section 481 of the iii. Companies Act, 1956 and/or discharge the Official Liquidator as the Li...
Maher Elahi vs.rubana Haroon
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 10.2019 RC.REV. 116/2018 & CM APPL. 12079/2018 MAHER ELAHI RUBANA HAROON versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Praneet Pranav and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 13.10.2017 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from shop bearing No.686, Bali Saudagaran, Ballimaran, Chandni Chowk, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition.3. The ground of eviction pleaded by the respondent is that the RC.REV.116/2018 Page 1 of 8 tenanted premises are required bonafide by the respondent and the me...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.dr. Gausal Azam Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 436/2018 & C.M. APPLs. 1843/2018 and 1845/2018 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate. DR. GAUSAL AZAM KHAN versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sathish and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER % 21.10.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Director General of the Defence Research Development Organization (DRDO) and its other officers, have filed this petition, challenging an order dated 20th July, 2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT), allowing OA No.3685/2014, filed by the Respondent herein, and quashing the penalty order dated 8th December, 2015, passed by the Disciplinary Authority (DA), awarding him the punishment of reduction to a lower time-scale of pay by three stages for a period of one year with effect from date of issue of this ord...
Rishabh Jain vs.jasmine Buildmart Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
s* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 09.2019 Pronounced on:21. 10.2019 M.K. JAIN M.K. JAIN NEERU JAIN % + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 280/2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 281/2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 282/2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 283/2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 284/2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 285/2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 286/2019 M.K. JAIN (HUF) THROUGH MR. M.K. JAIN, KARTA M.K. JAIN RISHABH JAIN Versus M.K.JAIN ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent JASMINE BUILDMART PVT. LTD. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, Mr. Akhil sibal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Kuber Dewan, Ms. Manjira, Ms. Deboshree, Mr. Vipul Wadhwa, Ms. Suvarna Kashyap, Advocates O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 280-286/2019 Page 1 of 44 Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Bina Gupta, Ms. Sheena Taqui, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Ms. Suvarna Dubey, Advocates CORAM: HON...
Inderwati & Ors vs.paramand Sharma & Ors (Hdfc Ergo General Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~25 * % + MAC.APP. 833/2019 INDERWATI & ORS Decided on:21. 10.2019 ..... Appellants IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate. versus PARMANAND SHARMA & ORS (HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhay Singh Bhadoria, Advocate for Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) CM APPL. 46118/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed-off. CM APPL. 46119/2019 (for delay) 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned.4. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 833/2019 5.6. Issue notice. The learned counsel named above accepts notice. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal. MAC.APP. 833/2019 Page 1 of 3 7. This appeal seeks enhancement of the award of compensation dated 17.11.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.296/18, on the ground that co...
S. S. Rana vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h September, 2019 Decided on:21. t October, 2019 W.P.(C) 1881/1996 S. S. RANA UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam with Mr. Vivek Ojha and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Abha Malhotra, Senior Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 The challenge in the present petition is to the charge-sheets dated 31st January, 1994 and 14th January, 1995, and the consequent General Security Force Court (GSFC) proceedings ending in the findings and sentence of dismissal from service awarded on 31st May, 1995 and the subsequent order dated 24th April, 1996 of the Central Government rejecting the representation of the... Petitioner, but commuting the said sentence of dismissal from service to that of compulsory retirement.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner was, in the year 1990, working as a Quarter Master of the ...
Shri Nikhil Singhal & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 21, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2968/2019 & Crl.M.A. 38651/2019 SHRI NIKHIL SINGHAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate versus Through Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State/R-1 with SI Vinit Kumar, P.S.: Prashant Vihar CORAM: Mr. Harish Parashar, Advocate for R-2 alongwith Respondent no.2/Sakshi Singhal in person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Quashing of FIR No.178/2018, under Sections 498A/406 IPC, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled. Respondent no.2 is present in the court today and submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners without any undue influence, coercion or pressure from any source whatsoever.2. Notice.3. Ms. Shivani Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent/State W.P.(...
Boehringer Ingelheim India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.drugs Controller General of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 7585/2016 & CM Nos. 31253/2016, 32248/2016, 41210/2016, 41251/2016, 5677/2018, 27659/2018, 28204/2018, 47154/2018, 1301/2019, 8471/2019 & 13702/2016 BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: Mr Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar, Ms Arpita Sawhney and Mr Arun Kumar Jana, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Prateek Dhanda and Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for R-1. Mr Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Mr Aman Shukla, Advocates for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying for revocation of the marketing approval granted to respondent no.2 (M/s Gennova Biopharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.) for its drug Tenectase, use...
Shailendra Paul vs.mukesh Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2019
$~A-37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 SHAILENDRA PAUL O.M.P. (MISC.) 40/2019 % + CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH versus MUKESH AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Mukul Rawal, Advocate ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate ..... Respondent JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14560/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (MISC) 40/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. This is a joint petition filed under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for making the Award.4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the Arbitration Clause in the Collaboration Agreement dated 24.10.2010 was invoked. Vide order dated 21.12.2015, a Sole Arbitrator was appointed by this Court who entered upon reference on 16.02.2016.5. Statutory period of twelve...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »