Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 74 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)Chaudhary Kishan Chand and Sons (Huf) vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7489/2012 MAHENDER YADAV UOI & ANR versus + W.P.(C) 4951/2014 HARSH KUMAR AGARWAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus Reserved on:04. 10.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 917/2018 CHAUDHARY KISHAN CHAND & SONS (HUF)........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus + CS(OS) 3518/2012, I.A. 3927/2013 & 15957/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST RAYMOND LTD & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person in W.P.(C) 516/2010 with Sh. Pranav Jain, Advocate, for... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C) 516/2010. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Rhea. G. Munjal, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi and Sh. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4951/2014. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Ms. Ananya Mukherjee, Advocates, for Respondent No.3, in W.P.(C) 516/2010.. Sh. Ankit Jain and Sh. Siddhnat Nath, Advocates, for New Delhi...
Tag this Judgment!New Delhi Municipal Council vs.krishan Lal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :28. 11.2018 Date of Decision:07. 01.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.3287/2013 and CM No.6229/2013 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vaibhav Agnihotri, Adv. versus KRISHAN LAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Rashmi Chopra, Ms.Vriti Anand and Ms.Asiya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.1. Aggrieved of the orders dated 20.05.2011 and 23.01.2012 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal in short 'CAT' in OA No.1583/2010 and RA No.432/2011 respectively, the petitioner-New Delhi Municipal Council in short 'NDMC', has preferred the instant writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing of the said orders.2. Concisely, the relevant facts are that the respondents are the engineers of the Electrical Wing - Auto Workshop of NDMC, who joined it sometime around the year 1979/1980 on the pay-scales as provided for by NDMC W.P.(C.) No.3287...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and Anr. Vs.nisha Priya Bhatia
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 03.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 2735/2010, C.M. APPL.14149/2010, 5262/2011, 9937/2011, 10949/2012, 16523/2014, 20934/2015, 20936/2015, 22538/2015, 41873/2017, 41874/2017 & 45165/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Sh. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Sudhir Walia, Sh. Ajay Digpaul and Sh. Archit Upadhyaya, Advocates. Versus NISHA PRIYA BHATIA .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This judgment will dispose of a challenge to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), allowing an application by the applicant, Ms. Nisha Priya Bhatia (hereafter referred to as the applicant, the officer or Ms. Bhatia as the case may be) and quashing an order dated 18.12.2009. By that order, the Central Government voluntarily retired her by invoking Rule 135 of the Research and Ana...
Tag this Judgment!Anuj Kumar vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4/2019 & Crl.M.A. 15/2019 ANUJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Dalal, Advocate Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Asha Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Sonu Ram Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.111/2016, under SectionsIPC, registered at police station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 17th December, 2018 and on ground that the misconception, which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties.2. Upon notice, Ms. Asha Tiwari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sonu Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 4/201...
Tag this Judgment!Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:07. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 3174/2018, C.M. Appl. No.12596/2018 SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. + W.P.(C) 3175/2018, C.M. Appl. No.12598/2018 SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Nageshwar Rao, Mr. Sandeep S. Karnail, Mr. Parth, Advocates Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) It is stated that the petitioners counsel that the rejoinder was filed; apparently, the respondent has not received copy of the same. W.P.(C) No.3174 & 3175 of 2018 Page 1 of 5 Let the same be supplied. The petitioners grievance is with respect to the demand made by the Assessing O...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Garg vs.state of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:07. h January, 2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2234/2018 MUKESH GARG versus STATE OF NCT DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner: Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avijit Singh and Ms. Nisha Garg, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for theState Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Adv. for complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.613/2018 under Sections under Section323/354/376-D/452/120-B/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Rohini, New Delhi.2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the prosecutrix alleging that she is divorced and lives alone. It is alleged that about two months before registration of the FIR, she came in contact with one Rinku, co-accused and subsequently became friendly with him BAIL APPLN. 2234/2018 Page 1 of 5 an...
Tag this Judgment!Director, Gail (India) Ltd. And Ors. Vs.nanak Ram
Court: Delhi
$~18 to 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & CM APPL. 15611/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner RAI SINGH + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6547/2014 & CM APPL. 15613/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner JITENDER KUMAR + Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6871/2014 GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. versus SHRI JAI BHAGWAN + W.P.(C) 6874/2014 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6546/2014 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 KALI RAM + versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6876/2014 DIRECTOR, GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners versus Through: Mr. Vineet Malik, Advocate. SHRI SRI RAM + W.P.(C) 68...
Tag this Judgment!Central Bank of India vs.new Delhi Municipal Council (South) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:06. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:07. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10074/2015 & CM APPL No.24677/2015 CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Advocate. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (SOUTH) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS for Through : Ms.Puja Kalra, Advocate NDMC/ Respondent No.1 Mr.Santosh Tripathi, ASC and Mr.Rishabh Oswal, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi. Choudhary, Ms.Aknksha Mr.S.Katyal and Mr.Akshay Sapra, Advocates for respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This writ petition is for quashing the impugned order dated 02.01.2013 passed by respondent no.2 while disposing of the representation dated 29.10.2012 made by the petitioner pursuant to an order dated 15.10.2012 in W.P.(C) 6268/2012.2. The brief facts are: a) In the year 1970 the petitioner was inducted as a tenant in property No.8, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, Gole Market, New Delhi; W.P.(C) 10074/201...
Tag this Judgment!Dhroov Sahni vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Wockhardt Limited and Anr vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:07. 01.2019 % + WOCKHARDT LIMITED AND ANR W.P.(C) 9739/2018 ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Ms Saman Ahsan, Mr Sanjeev K Kapoor. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG, Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC and Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Waize Ali Noor, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Ms Shruti Dutt, Mr Sahil Sood, Mr Viplav Acharya and Mr Harshul Choudhary, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning the 1. notification No.S.O. 4379 (E) 07.09.2018 (hereafter the impugned notification) issued by respondent no.1 (Central Government) under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (hereafter the Act). By the impugned notification, the Central Government has prohibited the manufacture for sale, sale or distrib...
Tag this Judgment!