Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 67 of about 755 results (0.019 seconds)Faeem vs.state
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 980/2004 and Crl.M.A.9483/2009 IN THE MATTER OF: FAEEM STATE Date of Decision:08. 01.2019 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sumeet Verma & Mr. Satyam Sharma, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MS. HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 06.04.2004, passed by the learned ASJ in SC No.95/2003, arising out of FIR No.90/2000 registered at PS Geeta Colony under Sections 302/324/120B/34 IPC. The appellant herein was arrayed in the case as accused No.1. Under the impugned judgment, the appellant and two co- accused were convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/3IPC. Vide order dated 08.04.2004, on the point of sentence, each of the three co-accused were sentenced to life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Sections 3IPC and were directed to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- each. In defa...
Tag this Judgment!Naveen Gupta & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1439/2017 & Crl.M.A. 5927/2017 NAVEEN GUPTA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Samarth Rai Sethi, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Mr. Dinesh S. Tripathi & Mr. Sunil K. Singh, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Vide impugned order of 17th November, 2016 (Annexure P-1), petitioners have been summoned in a complaint under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.2. The challenge to the impugned order by petitioners counsel is on the ground that respondent No.2-wife had deserted petitioner-husband six years prior to filing of the complaint and petitioner has already obtained ex parte decree of divorce in August, 2016 and respondent-wife had abstained herself from appearing in divorce proceedings. It is submitted that this Crl.M....
Tag this Judgment!Hcl Infosystems Limited vs.virgo Softech Limited
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + O.M.P. (COMM) 33/2018 & IA No.1179/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :8. h January, 2019 HCL INFOSYSTEMS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.V.N.Koura, Mr.S.Sirish Kumar, Mr.Abhinav Tandon, Advs. versus VIRGO SOFTECH LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Saurav Agrawal, Mr.Akhil Sachar, Chowdhary, Mr.Anshuman Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 26.08.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Project Execution Agreement dated 02.08.2010 (hereinafter referred to as the PEA) executed between the parties.2. The PEA had been executed between the petitioner, the respondent and one Accor Services Pvt. Ltd., which was not made a party to the arbi...
Tag this Judgment!East West Pharma vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Tag this Judgment!Surender Singh Kasana vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~1 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"8th January, 2019 CRL. M.C. 1326/2016 SURENDER SINGH KASANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Anand, Mr. Gaurav Adlakha, Ms. Radha & Mr. Manjeet Gulliya, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to Sidharth Kasana, son of the petitioner, on 15.02.2010, but the marriage ran into rough weather and she statedly left the matrimonial home. Eventually, she filed a petition under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act, for short) on 26.06.2014, attributing certain acts of commission, inter alia to the petitioner (father-in-law), others impleaded in the said proceedings being inclusive of the husband, the mother-in-law, sisters-in-law etc. In the said petition under DV Act, she levelled certain allegations against the petitioner as well.2. Referring to the sai...
Tag this Judgment!Eris Lifesciences Limited vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Tag this Judgment!Ms. Sweety Bhalla vs.industrial Financial Corporation of India Ltd. (I ...
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2018 Pronounced on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 4287/2015 MS. SWEETY BHALLA ........ Petitioner Through Dr.Aurobindo Ghose, Adv. versus INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (IFCI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Anurag Sharma, Adv. with Ms.Ruchira Gupta, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Rahul Narayanan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby 1. JUDGMENT directing the respondent to grant promotion to the petitioner for the post of AGM in terms of the Recruitment rules in a time bound manner after fixation her due seniority in the organization since the date of appointment and the rule of reservation in promotion which is applicable in the case of persons with disabilities. He further seeks direction to the respondent thereby setting aside the Office Order dated 23.02.2015, 12.03.2015 and 01.04.2015. He also seeks direction thereby directing the respondent for W.P....
Tag this Judgment!Unison Pharamaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2019 + W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & CM Nos. 40515-40516/2018 UNISON PHARAMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10128/2018 & CM Nos. 39519/2018 & 44752/2018 WITH ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10711/2018 & CM Nos. 41727-41728/2018 WITH M/S EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent WITH + W.P.(C) 10756/2018 & CM Nos. 41976-41977/2018 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 10403/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 31 DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10935/2018 & CM Nos. 42603/2018 & 44753/2018 LUPIN LIMITED & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 10966/2018 & CM Nos. 42726-42727/2018 EAST WEST PHARMA versus UNION OF INDIA ..........
Tag this Judgment!Pankaj Chawla vs.divya Kapoor
Court: Delhi
* I N T H E H I G H C O U R T O F D E L H I A T N E W D E L H I % Judgment reserved on:01. t November, 2018 Judgment delivered on:08. h January, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 146/2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent PANKAJ CHAWLA versus DIVYA KAPOOR + CRL.REV.P. 172/2017 DIVYA KAPOOR versus PANKAJ CHAWLA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.R.D.Singh, Adv. in CRL.REV.P. 146/2017 Mr. Osama Suhail, Ms. Samana Suhail and Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Advs in CRL.REV.P. 172/2017 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Osama Suhail, Ms. Samana Suhail and Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Advs. in CRL.REV.P. 146/2017 Mr.R.D.Singh, Adv. in CRL.REV.P. 172/2017 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.REV.P. 146/2017 & CRL.REV.P. 172/2017 1. These cross-petitions impugn order dated 19.01.2017, whereby, the Family Court has disposed of the interim maintenance application filed by the Wife Divya Kapoor and directed the husband Pankaj Chawla t...
Tag this Judgment!Himachal Helicopter Skiing Pty Ltd vs.himalayan Heli Services Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2017 Decided on:8. h January, 2019 CS(OS) 205/2009 RODERICK JOHN ANDREW MACKENZIE..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Kirti S. Javali and Ms.Nikita C. Jain, Advocates. Versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. + Crl. M.A. No.5011/2009 in CS(OS) 210/2009 HIMACHAL HELICOPTER SKIING PTY LTD...... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Kirti S. Javali, Advocate. versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD...... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Roderick John Andrew Mackenzie, the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.205/2009 filed the suit inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants their employees, servants, agents etc. from using or otherwise copying, selling, offering for sale, counterfeit/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs copyright in his artistic work HIMLAYAN ...
Tag this Judgment!