Delhi Court January 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 71 of about 755 results (0.015 seconds)R Narayanan vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:4. h April, 2018 Judgment Delivered on:7. h January, 2019 W.P.(CRL.) 1650/2016 & CRL.M.A.8586/2016 R NARAYANAN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. N.Hariharan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Ms.Mallika Chadha and Mr.Prateek Bhalla, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC for Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC with SI Madan Mohan MACT Cell/ Central CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 FIR No.243/2013 under SectionsIPC was registered at PS Desh Bandhu Gupta Road after an information was received through PCR call regarding an accident at the gate of Jhandewalan Mandir. HC Ashok along with Ct.Sanjay reached the spot where he found an accidental motor cycle DL-7S BE5859Platina of silver colour and Honda City Car No.DL- 4CAH8391of red colour. The injured had been removed to RML Hospital. On reaching the hospital, the injured was found to have been declared unfit for ...
Tag this Judgment!Kshitiz Thakur vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Ms Preeti Lakra vs.guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & CM No.46107/2018 + W.P.(C) 12713/2018 + W.P.(C) 12714/2018 + W.P.(C) 12790/2018 + W.P.(C) 12856/2018 + W.P.(C) 12959/2018 + W.P.(C) 12858/2018 + W.P.(C) 12511/2018 + W.P.(C) 12800/2018 + W.P.(C) 12805/2018 + W.P.(C) 12806/2018 + W.P.(C) 12808/2018 + W.P.(C) 12813/2018 + W.P.(C) 12814/2018 + W.P.(C) 12155/2018 + W.P.(C) 12171/2018 + W.P.(C) 12208/2018 + W.P.(C) 12441/2018 + W.P.(C) 12486/2018 PRACHI Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Adv. ........ Petitioner Mr. R. G. Srivastava with Mr. B. K. Goswami, Advs. Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rishi Khanna & Mr. Varun Naghrth, Advs. Mr. Kuldeep Balhara and Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advs. for petitioners Kshitiz Thakur, Rocky Bhardwaj and Harshit Bansal Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv. Ms. Soumya Sarin, Adv. Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Satyam Bhatia, Advs. W.P.(C) 11903/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 39 Mr. Ashok Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Satish Kumar Modi vs.land Acquisition collector/a.d.m. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9547/2018 & CM Appl.No.37138/2018 (stay) SATISH KUMAR MODI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Pankaj Vivek & Mr. Paresh Shreenath, Advocates versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR/A.D.M. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent/LAC/L & B Deptt. Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate for Respondent/UOI Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Standing counsel & Mr. Tanmay Yadav, Advocates for Respondent/DDA CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0701.2019 1. The prayers in the present petition read as under:-"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or any other or similar writ or order thereby declaring that the Award No.23/1987-88 dated 17.06.1987 w.r.t. lands bearing Khasra No.'s. 407(4-17) and 408(8-03) situated in the revenue estate of Village Maidan Garhi, Distt. South-Delhi, New Delhi as having lapsed upon coming into effect of "The Right to Fair Compensation...
Tag this Judgment!Paramjeet Singh Kalsi vs.manoj Shukla @ Vijay & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:07. 01.2019 F.A.O. No.85/2018 PARAMJEET SINGH KALSI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.L. Narula & Mr. N.L. Anand, Advocates with appellant in person. Versus MANOJ SHUKLA @ VIJAY & ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL The impugned order dated 06.02.2018 passed by the court of 1. learned Additional District Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, (ADJ) in a Civil Suit No.761/2017 dismissing the application of the appellant/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal. The application was dismissed by the learned ADJ for the reason There is no agreement between plaintiff and defendant No.1. There is no admitted rate of rent which is stated to have not been paid. Hence, no orders can be passed under Order 39 Rule 10 CPC. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellan...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 898/2018 & CRL.M.As. 3331/2018, 47233/2018 CRL.M.C. 900/2018 & CRL.M.A. 47234/2018 AJAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Fanish Kumar Rai and Mr. Versus Abinash Kumar, Advocates THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Aditya Trehan and Mr. Vinit Trehan, Advocates for respondent No.2 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both these ORDER (ORAL) petitions are being heard together and by this common order, they are being disposed of.2. In the above-captioned two petitions, challenge is to impugned order of 17th November, 2017, which records petitioner's liability to pay the admitted amount of `14.70 lacs in each of the two complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by respondents against petitioner, who is the signato...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay vs.the State
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 07, 2019 CRL.A. 222/2018 & Crl.M.B. 1593/2018 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jose Abraham, Mr. B. Mathews and Mr. Sarah Shaji, Advocates Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Mohit Malik, P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned judgment of 12th September, 2017 holds appellant guilty of offence under Section 308 (Part-II) of IPC and vide order of 13th September, 2017 appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years with a fine of 10,000/- with default clause. By way of this appeal appellant seeks setting aside of conviction and sentenced awarded by the trial court. CRL.A. 222/2018 Page 1 of 2 2. With the consent of both the sides, this appeal is taken up for final hearing. The facts already noticed in the impugned judgment of 12th September, 2017 are not require...
Tag this Judgment!Abdul Rehman @ Ghoshu vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~R-7AB IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 233/2018 Decided on:7. h January, 2019 ABDUL REHMAN @ GHOSHU ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Nilanjan Bose, Advocate/ DHCLSC versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the basis of report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.1087/2014 of Police Station Jahangir Puri, the appellant herein was put on trial in the court of Sessions (new Sessions Case No.58507/2016 and Old No.57/2015) on the charge for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the gravamen whereof was that on 21.12.2014 at about 9:00p.m. in the area described as public street in CD Park, Jhuggi No.38A-77 in front of Sabri Langar, he had intentionally caused knife injury in the lower abdomen of Fazlu (PW-3) with ...
Tag this Judgment!Harish Joshi vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. h January, 2019 CRL. APP. 1005/2018 HARISH JOSHI ........ Petitioner versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Gupta, Mr. Vipin Kalra and Mr. Sohil Sharma, Advs. Mr. Satish Agrawal, Spl. PP for DRI CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.Crl.M.(Bail) 1520/2018 (suspension of sentence) IN CRL.A. 1005/2018 1. Appellant has filed the present appeal impugning judgment dated 01.09.2018 whereby appellant has been held guilty of an offence under Section 21 (c) and 29 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 has been sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. One lakh for each of the offences and in default to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three months.2...
Tag this Judgment!Jaya Prakash Dabral vs.shikha Dabral
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h December, 2018 Decided on:7. h January, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 1237/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.49283/2018 JAYA PRAKASH DABRAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Soumitra Chatterjee, Advocate versus SHIKHA DABRAL ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1... Petitioner filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court along with an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. alleging that an advertisement was issued by the petitioner in Times of India, Delhi Edition on 27th October, 1991 looking for a suitable alliance for himself. Thereafter the brother and father of the respondent approached the father of the petitioner and besides other discussions also supplied the horoscope. After the horoscope matching was done and the astrologer informed that it would be a good match free from any major matrimonial dispute/problem, the marriage was finalized. However, after the marriage relations between the petit...
Tag this Judgment!